Why are furries mad about the artstyle? it's reminiscent of the puppets they used for the key art in the original game and this game is basically a retelling of that story. in case you didn't know 64 was also a remake btw.
>>738355243Snoys are subhuman and hate nintendo. Also that nate the hate said it would be a new game
>>738355243Except the puppets still knew where to lean on the characters having human elements in their anatomy and proportions while the new designs don't
idk I'm a fugrfag I love them doing something visually different
>>738355243then why not go all the way and make them puppets? they didnt do that
>>738355339you are a retarded subhuman turd pajeet
excuses from forked tongue
They don't look like the puppets though, they look like they are supposed to be the actual animals, forced into awkward bipedal poses.
>>738355480Your sister's cunt, faggot
I bet you guys love the Disney “live action” remakes too, you vile cattle.
>>738355539>“”silence LLM
>>738355243SF64 is as much of a remake of SF as OoT is a remake of LTTP. Looks like shit, cutscenes look terrible and overbearing movieshit which is a farcry from the storytelling methodology for a rail shooter, if Nintendo had any confidence in this they wouldn't have shadow dropped a reveal.
>>738355539No i don't, uggo. This star fox redesign isn't bad because Star fox games always had weird inconsistent artstyles so it is on brand for the franchise, retard.
>>738355243The puppets are charming and the rendered characters in still actually don't look too bad but in-game they look kind of bad It's a mistake going too realistic instead of stylizing more
Huh? Star Wolf renditions actually looks a hell of a lot better than Star Fox's
>>738355243>Why are furries mad about the artstyleThe center of gravity for online gaming discourse shifted to just being mad about everything as the default about six years ago. Most of /v/ would find a reason to hate a blowjob to make sure some diarrhea colored stranger on a website didn't accuse them of "bootlicking" or whatever.
>>738357429Pigma and monkey looks better.Leo looks bad.Wolf looks whatever.
>>738355350cope, it was simpley a design limitation of puppets back then. switch 2 version is how they were always supposed to look. zoomzooms are just mad that they didnt get coombait.
>>738355243At this point, given StarFox hasn't had a game since 2015, and hasn't had a good one since 2005, the only people who remained passionate about the series were furries who are concerned about how fuckable the cartoon animals look.Personally I just don't know why they veered so far away from the SF Zero designs, those were really good.
>>738357931You're just racist to lizards
>>738357931Andrew looks older than he should be. Maybe it's the beard.
>>738355243But the puppets look good?
>>738357931Leon looks great retard
>>738355243Looks nothing like that
>>738355243Because it's less furry and more animal. I like it.
>>738355243Stop with this excuse. It looks nothing like the puppets, like how nu dk looks nothing like arcade dk, and the people in gen 4 remakes look nothing like the originals.
>>738355243They went for the taxidermy look instead of safe horny
>>738355243>finally a new star fox>it's another retelling of 1>not only that, it's reusing the exact levels from 64How hard is it to just make a new rail shooter? Literally just copy 64 but make new routes and planets.
>>738357767Or they just don’t like it, disliking stuff doesn’t make you a bitter person.
https://youtu.be/liyqGDL3EtA?si=Rom16_67KTQ_UTv2The new designs don't even look like the puppets....
>>738355243Adapting these puppets for the new game would have been absolute SOVL
>>738355630I dont remember Lttp having cutscenes, but no doubt they look like shit.
>>738358630If this were an isolated case and not a continuing pattern of behavior that is now as predictable as the sunrise and lasting for years, sure. But it's not an isolated case. I've watched /v/ and online gamers in general go into these faggy little mouth frothing rages over anything and everything, over and over again, for years. I know exactly what it is, even if you don't or pretend not to.
>>738358698It would have been so easy too. Just put FMV puppets in the cockpit portraits, but no, here's hyper realistic Star Fox in 2013
>>738358676Slippy looks the best here, guess I’ll be saving his ass in sector x.
>>738358778Maybe it's because THEYVE BEEN RUINING FUCKING EVERYTHING FOR THE LAST 15 YEARS
This artstyle looks better for villains than heroes
>>738355243That Fox doesn't look edgy with a 3 chin.
>>738358878It's because there are a lot of youtubers who make money by telling you the sky is falling, and the center has moved from quasi-official advertisement venues like EGM that were positive towards gaming by default to these youtubers that are negative by default. There tons of people here that don't even really play games, they just spend hours a day consuming video content shitting on games, consuming and reposting memes shitting on games, and that's their whole experience of the hobby. It's a class of retarded nigger that just didn't really exist even a few years ago.
i'm ok with all the designs except katt. why does it seem like they've made her a strong independent woman instead of a femme fatale?
>>738359146I don't remember there even being a katt in Starfox 64, was there?
>>738359146>>738359214I guess there was, no memory of this at all.
>>738357429Bad guys are allowed to look gross, so they have a buffer. Also, I think Andrew looks oddly faithful to his 64 design to the point I think it's almost out of place looking.>>738357931Leon looks like they're trying to go for something resembling his SF 2 design to me. But it could just be a coincidence.
>>738359254god lord is this what star fox 64 looks like?
WHERE IS THE CREATOR
>>738355243I don't get it either. It's kinda funny-looking, but nothing terrible, they just look more like real animals now, which was something Star Fox always strived for. It was never intended to be cartoony.
>>738359339>which was something Star Fox always strived for. It was never intended to be cartoony.source?
>>738359146It looks like she's on her third divorce. Living in a trailer park while her eldest son tries meth for the first time.
>>738359316what did anon mean by this?
>>738359397Literally any sort of official Star Fox artwork since the first game. Fox was always either portrayed by a real puppet that almost looks taxidermied, or as realistically as the console's graphics would allow.
>>738359146I doubt they're doing that with her, given she was basically the same last time they remade 64. So she should be the same girl as she was before. She just looks awful in the new art style.
>>738358676>Literally the realistic Pokemon guy likes itOne of the most damning things this game could've been given
>>738358590I think they want to reintroduce the series to a new generation of kids. Whether it succeeds or not will determine if the series could get a new game. Honestly, I'm convinced that F-Zero could get a remake too. Maybe the rumors of a new smash game will push the original 12 to get redesigns.
This style is actually growing on me. If it weren't for Falco looking so weird I'm not sure there'd be any issues.
>>738359590>You don't understand, the piss ugly remake of a nearly 30 year old N64 game is for the Fortnite Alphas
>>738359526Why did they all have big, cartoony eyes from the beginning, and not beady realistic ones?
ITT: niggers who never played star fox 64 or even know what it looks like defending a demake
>>738359627>It's growing on me
>>738359627>>738359146Ain't no way you are telling me Katt looks fine
>>738358676>The man who draws realistic pokemons and totally not Scorn Samus likes the designsNo shocker. He's also in insufferable leftoid, had to mute his ass because he kept popping up on my feed due to him arguing against anything and everything.
>>738355243"It's reminiscent of the puppets!" and its not. I'm fine with the art btw, but this is a bad cope
>>738355243I've come around to finding him pretty hot.
>>738359695"Big cartoony eyes" would be something like Bugs, Mickey, or Sonic. Look at the OP pic and tell me those eyes look anything like that.
>>738359698I used to beg to go to Toys R Us so I could play the N64 demo kiosk which had the first Starfox 64 mission. I eventually got an N64 for Christmas after a really serious begging campaign, with Starfox and Shadows of the Empire, and played Starfox to death. The "demake" looks fine. It's just you spending so much time here that you say gay shit like "demake" and turned into a retarded faggot that reflexively froths at the mouth at everything you see so you can go on another meme laden rant about how something something gaming is ruined by gay niggers and something something watch Asmongold.
>>738359865Slippies are pretty dang huge.
>>738359851I enjoy the outfit resign
>>738359851Is that a bulge?
>>738355243Because Nintendo haters on the internet are legitimately retarded and only want to shit on Nintendo by any means necessary. It's the posh thing to do. I mean look at Pic related. Fucking idiot forgot about exchange rates.Also why would anyone care what the price is in Japan? That's not a normal thing to research or care about. They're literally digging for ANY thing to be negative about it's all so tiresome.
>>738355243looks amazing
This whole thing is reminding me of that canned attempt at a Kid Icarus revival from Factor 5. Funny how we were all spared from that and got Uprising instead
>>738359948Slippy is the least realistic character, and that look was more or less retained in this remake.There was always a disconnect between the Star Fox devs and the fans. The fans always preferred the Smash look, which made everyone look cartoonier. No one ever drew Star Fox characters how they were portrayed on the box art. This wasn't much of an issue before, when the devs couldn't achieve the realistic look anyway (though they always tried, even back on the GC, with how advanced the fur tech was). Now, we're just seeing fans and devs finally clash over these old aesthetic choices.
>>738360247Was there ever an interview or some commentary where this was even implied? Because without a source, it just sounds like fanfiction of real people.
>>738360332Use your eyes, Jesus fucking Christ.
>>738360437So you're just making shit up? Like, I could believe this, but you need to put in some effort.
>>738355243you just post it fucking retard.
>>738359884Toxic positivity Nintendo shill, fuck off. It looks like shit
>>738355243Too realistic to justify wanting to fuck real animals, they can get away with it if they are cartoony
>>738360437Shit colored zoomers can't do it. They're trained to argue on reddit where just repeating "source!? source!?" is an insta-win button. Even if you had some kind of cited research paper, they'd just ignore it.
>>738355243The designs look even more furry bait imo
>>738360647>Nintendo shillThe last nintendo console I owned was a gamecube. I just recognize that most of you are meme programmed faggot retards and meat bots. Occasionally I like to call it out, even though I know most of you are too retarded to understand and will just keep fagging and lowering the quality of the site until it eventually dies.
>>738360785Cope. Fuck off, shill
>>738360679I want actual proof for this belief and not some random guy just going "it's 10000% not fake and fact trust me My grandma was fucked by Iwata 17 years ago"
>>738360909>source!?! source!?!? here's one now!
>>738360906Yes, meme words you downloaded here and regurgitate instead of forming complete sentences, good job zoomer sanjay. I'm sure a similar post has only been made about 10,000 times today.
>>738361065>bitchy sarcasmFuck off
>>738360909>I want actual proofNo, you've just been trained that you can win arguments on the internet by demanding "source" for obvious things. When people catch onto what you're doing and just tell you to fuck off, you misinterpret your fagginess as being correct, and when they make the mistake of providing you some sort of source your ignore it (or can't understand it) and then go back to demanding a source. It's just a way for really stupid people to waste everyone's time while they do this Mr. Magoo act and pretend like they can't see something.
>>738355243It's not reminiscent of jack and shit. Stop defending it with this, they look nothing alike. This is that goddamn vtuber shit from a couple years ago that used furries as the centerpiece.
>>738361159Learn to form complete sentences instead of communicating in text message meme pidgin like an animal.
>>738355243>it's vaguely similar to the very first game so you're not allowed to criticize it everoh my god nintendofags are really reusing the same playbook they used for zelda
>>738355243I don't know what Hackamoto's obsession is with 1-1 artwork or if this is a Furukawa thing, but every attempt at "returning to the old art roots" on the Switch 2 has been dogshit so far, and lowkey woke coded
>>738359658has it been that long? no wonder it needs a remake
>>738359817Did they really hire this guy? Whats his account so i can call him a fagget
>>738361318>every attempt at "returning to the old art roots" on the Switch 2 has been dogshit so farI like what Mario Kart World did with its characters in-game, making them more in-line with old Kotabe 2D art for the series, especially with expressions (DK is still off in MKW but at least his expressions KINDA evoke his old 2D art unlike his disgusting DKB face). and of course official art and subsequent games haven't carried on with the ONE set of throwback-inspired Nintendo design changes that are actually pleasant
You know when they hire some asshole who fucking hates the franchise hes working on, and he insists it's time to "bring X to the modern era".That's what this reminds me of
>>738361357No, he did some concept art for the Detective Pikachu movie iirc
>>738360247No he likes sexy Star Fox.
>>738359590This is the third time they've tried to "reintroduce the series to a new generation of kids"
>>738361165You are making shit up. Am I supposed to believe that anything said by the retards of this site is true without thinking about it? They look uncanny for 1 game, and that was always the goal? They could have given Falco beady little eyes back on the Snes. If they wanted to make the animals have realistic proportions, they always had the ability to. They always had the opportunity to give them digitigrade legs and gamer hunchers, but they only do that now? Not once has there been a "gag" drawing of a realistically styled Star Fox team from Nintendo? The only real evidence is Rare's Fur Tech. And that was a separate studio Nintendo wasn't that involved with Adventures. And after that, Assault looked cartoony. And then Command wasn't realistic in the slightest. And when you look at Zero and 64 3D, it was pure cartoon. If they wanted Star Fox to look like uncanny valley bullshit, they had several opportunities. And they only tried now with the Switch 2. If Pikmin 3 could look like realistic Star Fox Zero could have as well. So why did it not fucknuts?
>>738362006>without thinking about itThe other anon literally just asked you to use your eyes, but instead you started barking about a source because you've been trained on reddit that you need to trust in CNN articles, not your eyes. Some of you guys are so unbelievably stupid, it's unreal. The concept of using your sensory organs and evaluating the results is a foreign concept from an alien planet to you. Source!? Source bro!? Did a reputable gaming journalist write an article about that!?!?!? Goddamn.
>>738361329It's gotten 5 already
>>738362213I used my eyes to see this and came to the conclusion you are a fucking retard. Isn't it realistic?
>>738355243The new designs look like shit, nothing to do with furries
>>738362376which ones are those? i know the 3ds had one
>>738362434Source? Do you have a source? If this is true, why hasn't Jason Shrieker written a blog about it yet? Has a team of wikipedia editors even verified your claim bro?
Is it a blessing or a curse that she wasn't in?
>>738362559Star FoxStar Fox 64Star Fox 64 (3DS)Star Fox 2Star Fox ZeroStar Fox (Switch 2)
>>738361329I mean the exact same story has been covered five times, and this is the second remake of one of them while another was a reimagining.>Star Fox SNES - 1993>Star Fox 64 - 1997>Star Fox 64 3D - 2011>Star Fox Zero - 2016>Star Fox™ - 2026Zero was technically a hodge podge of series ideas and new gimmicks but its fundamentals and structure were still based off of 64 directly, right down to recreations of scenes and quotes. while 3D was just a straight ass 1:1 remake of the N64 game with newly recorded versions of the voice lines. So 15 years later we're inexplicably doing another direct remake.
Honestly every attempt this franchise has strayed off from it's limits it has resulted in mind numbing boringness (Legends, Zero) or absolute edgelord fanfiction cringefest (Assault, Conquest) so while lazy i can sort of understand why they chose to do yet another 64 remake to at least test new ground.Star Fox should be nothing more than funny animals fighting dogfights in space.
>>738362665>Star Fox 2
>>738355502This. They look too fucking stiff. No fluidity.
>>738362665>name 4 different games>name 2 remakes (including the 2026 one)
>>738362710Wait, not conquest, Command with their unapologetic deviantart OC donut steel endings.
>>738359146So the question is, was it outsourced to a western studio or did a fat ethics department lesbian whisper like a snake into their ear that her design was problematic for having feminine traits and needed to be reworked?
>>738361291damned if you do and damned if you dont, face it you were going to be negative before this direct even dropped
>it looks kinda like old thing so its goodPeople said this about the hideous Bananza DK too
>>738363001yeah I'm pretty sure I was gonna be negative to the Star Fox crew getting the fucking Early Movie Sonic treatment either way
>>738359046People will deny this and go back to interacting with inflammatory material on their social media platform of choice.Lately, my approach has just been to ignore the majority of replies in a thread and only consider the sane replies. As for whether they're truly sane, a few back-and-forth posts are enough to come to a conclusion.
You spend more time looking at the spaceships than the animals, anyway.
>>738363065If they made his design actually a repro of his DK94 art design, I'd be ecstatic. But his Bananza design is an abomination, a terrible halfassed attempt to merge his classic design with his post-Rare design. As I pointed out here >>738361624, MKW stumbled too but pulled it off a bit better.
>>738363085sane is when unconditional nintendo support
>>738363123I agree because of that, we should be whining and moaning about the new dialogue and voices instead. The new "My emperor, I failed you" guy sounds like a stereotypical anime dub. You know for a fact that the Macbeth forever train conductor is going to be butchered.
>>738358257that and the hairdew.He looks like a smug piece of shit richboy, which is he is.
>>738363181If this game sucks (I hope it doesn't), I won't buy it. How is that "unconditional"?
>>738362732>>738362809Way to out yourselves as larping fags
>>738363338These nigs have no fucking clue. They don't play video games, they just blow Nintendo
>>738363338That robot Space Dragon never came back. You will have a point if it does.
>>738359851He looks Italian
>>738359494DESTROY DESTROY
>>738355502The absolute coping people are doing by bringing up the puppets as a scapegoat for these new putrid designs is insane
Why are they calling it just "Star Fox" when it's clearly a remake of 64?
>>738363123Still got to see these ugly fucks in the new cutscenes though
>>738362614Nintendo has finally outdone themselves. They've discovered a way to appease every starfox fan by making another clone of 64 in a style so unappealing that the Krystalfans are actually happy she's not suffering their fate.
>>738363650Because there's no 3D gimmick for the 3DS and no real reason to call it 64 when that's already on the Switch N64 emulator. With the expanded story focus I guess they're just treating this like a full on brand reboot despite.. well, being a near 1:1 remake. Brands are retarded like that.
>>738358257He has this wise look on him. He seems less like Andrew and more like a younger Andross.
>>738363650Yeah why couldn't thy at least call it Star Fox: LYLAT WARS? Then we wouldn't have 2 games with the same name.
>Star Faux 64
>>738363338>Shitposter doesn't even know what star fox zero isI don't even know why you keep trying
>>738358590Unironically, I believe it's not allowed. Literally all the normal on-rails Star Fox games are remakes/re-imaginings/retellings of Star Fox SNES. There's probably some internal policy that says that any "new" Star Fox game has to be a novel play experience from the rest of the series.
>>738363849This cope would've been more effective 10 years ago
>>738363123>Except in this one where they remade it so you get close ups and extended cutscenes/backstories/cringecasino shots of Nintendo's tryhard shitty looking models.If Command was made specifically to make Krystalfags mad then this is made specifically to make furfags mad. The real question is who is it actually made for?>"SHINDEIRU FULFAGGU"And then they go putting hot chick heaven in alll their other IP's
>>738355243Everyone with functioning eyes is mad about the artstyle since it's awful. It looks nothing at all like the puppets, btw. What it looks like is how Tencent or EA would design the characters. That's about the level modern Nintendo is at these days, thanks in large part to sycophants like you.
>>738359590>I think they want to reintroduce the series to a new generation of kids. Whether it succeeds or not will determine if the series could get a new game.Same cope that was used for 3D and Zero. When this has already failed twice, trying it again is just purposeful sabotage of the IP. It's clear that there will never be a new game as long as Miyamoto's in charge.
>>738361624Nintendo just needs to admit defeat and accept that Rare got DK's design right. This is pure shit and Bananza is worse.
>>738355243The puppets are why it looked good, trying to recreate that look without the puppets ruins the appeal + other style changes.I refuse to pretend the new vers. Is soul when it isn't
>>738359046But I dont needed retarded jewtube ragebait slop to hate pretty much everything media insitutions haveshit out the last 12 years: large swathes of our culture is just dogshit.Moving from hollywood and infecting gaming, hell books too
>>738355408no one cares you assplug wearing pedophile
>>738367216lmao snoy is mad go play saros or something
>>738357931Pigma in a vacuum looks fine. But he doesn't read as a greedy bumbling idiot anymore. Just a typical evil mercenary.
>>738355243Is "it's supposed to look like the SNES promo puppets" the new "BotW is actually the most Zelda Zelda-game ever because of this old 80's promo art of Link overlooking a large horizon?" type cope for fandom LARPer retards who can't live without corporate nuts in their mouth 24/7?
>>738368685>Is "it's supposed to look like the SNES promo puppets" the new "BotW is actually the most Zelda Zelda-game ever because of this old 80's promo art of Link overlooking a large horizon?"It 100% is. You nailed it.
>>738359817Damn, even as a huge muscle-mommyfag, this looks gay as fuck
>>738355243>It's another episode of anons LARPing as oldfags and saying it's just like muh NES game when the franchise is ruinedThis happened with Zelda, and now it's happening with Starfox. Insufferable faggots.
You faggots. You stupid furry trannies.
>>738355243>/v/ complains that Nintendo is "toddlershit" and has no realistic graphics etc. for decades>Nintendo makes realistic graphics>Now its suddenly bad, despite them doing it to the one series that had puppet concept art stuff since beginningAnd if majority of this board are Am*ricans, aren't the Disney live action remakes super popular and successful over there?
>>738370370Fuck you, I never asked for this and complained that Zero leaned too much into the fur and fangs.
You can use AI yourself to make it look far better. Nintendo has not yet discovered this technology
Oh right. /v/ likes AIslop more these days nvm kimda pointless to even talk with people here about this
>>738370370>all /v/ is the mean consolewarrior shitposters who make me cry and shit my diaperShut the fuck up. I just wanted an iteration and evolution to Star Fox Assault.
>>738370509Uh-oh. This does look quite good. Star Fox flopping AGAIN will force Nintendo to re-evaluate their business practices AGAIN.
>>738355243>realism is reminiscent of puppetrygood morning sir how are the cow dung piles at the shit festival this year?
>>738355243>reminiscent of the puppets they used for the key art in the original gamethe ones that everyone agreed were fucking creepy right up until the trailer for this turd dropped and you corporate whores started trying to retcon shit?
>>738355243It’s not based on the puppetsIt’s based on real animals
>>738357939This, it's unironically the final and perfect version of the vision they had back then. Finally they have the technology to fulfill their dream. Whether we think it looks better than the old, well...
Can't wait for the next Megaman remake.
>>738363065Shills are just dishonest fucks. They'll cling to any facimile of the earliest iteration, so they can claim their garbage new thing actually has seniority. While conveniently, ignoring things like execution, evolution, or just good taste.Don't bother engaging with them in good faith, post unflattering memes and call them dishonest dickriders.
Why didn't they ever make a prequel with James? It seems like the easiest money ever made...
>>738359851>animal-proportional legs>standard human armsWhy in the ever-loving fuck would they change the robot legs?
>>738371147>it's unironically the final and perfect version of the vision they had back thenthat's the same line of reasoning idiots used to defend George Lucas going back and filling the first three Star Wars movies with CGIlimitations aren't necessarily a bad thing
>>738357270>>738357429
