How can someone make a safe-horny design work without being overtly sexual or offending people?There a tons of vidya girls that aren't half naked that men lust over, how do we design a blue print for that for devs and designers to follow?
its less about not being overtly sexual and instead more to do with making aure the woman isnt conventionally attractive or youthful (18 to 25). when sexualising men just do whatever, it doesnt matter.
Just do what every other safehornyslop does and focus on femdom or feet. Those are the castrated faggot social media approved fetishes after all.
There's no such thing as safe horny, you've been psyop'd by epstein diddy bluds
>>738376737>There's no such thing as safe hornyCompare gaming journo & twitter normalfag reactions to Hades 2 and Stellar Blade.
safe horny = appeals to women and fagsbad horny = appeals to menso it's impossible to appeal to men and still be safe horny
Why can't you zoomer retards speak fucking english?
Make femdom and mock who people who like it and people who don't.
>>738376781I think there are some exceptions
is safe horny dark woke or light chud
>>738376431fucking kill yourself faggot
>>738376431By having non-safe horny in the game as well. Like spats. Spats are great but if everyone has spats they lose all charm and are just a censorship tool. Safe horny is only shit because it's being used as the only option rather than an option the artist wanted for a specific character.
>>738376937it's reddit core
>>738376937Woke intentions so dark woke.
>femdom>feet>hags>excessively large asses(past the point of reason and into full on niggy tier)>anything gayThese are safe horny.>nicely shaped breasts regardless of size>asses that are nice but not fuckhuge>girls of actual attractive ages>most normal fetishes reallyThis is normal horny.
>>738376937It's lightwoke
>>738376431Forced bullshit term. Back then you just called it sexy.
>>738377043What about tummy and armpits. Also I unironically think that girly or feminine personalities are even considered horny traits nowadays since the default is a girlboss.
Feet
>>738377117Docile personality is unsafe.It gives me the ick.
>>738376431People nowadays would've called Cynthia safehorny. I propose more hot, strong and confident women in hot dresses. What you can't see, you can with the mind's eye. Hot women in suits are also acceptable.
>>738377657I would argue there is a difference between a woman who is confident vs uuuu mommy please step on me and girlboss.
Stop using made up phrases
>>738377914It's a razor-sharp edge. Some people see safe horny and latch onto the implication of getting their balls smashed by mommy. Some people see safe horny and it's a docile highly feminine female. Others see a Kim Wexler type for an oddly specific implied sexy. The key is its the implication and that they're designed to be hot in a subtle way instead of making a 2B or Ivy.
I can't understand half the things you people say nowadays
Safe horny? What is it safe from? Please elaborate.
i want all millenials to fucking die, just hope they all get purged
>sharty
>>738377043you can just say that you are pedophile anon, it's hip and cool nowadays
>>738378636Something that makes your pp hard without showing a lot of skin so people could get angry about it on twatter
>>738378268same
>>738378749Loli isn't normal horny, it's based horny.
>>738378661"horny" as used in this context is a zoomerism - or perhaps an ELSism, not that there's much difference between the two. "horny" in millennial (and boomer) parlance meant sexually aroused, not lascivious/lewd/obscene in the sexual sense. the key distinction is that an inanimate object cannot be sexually aroused, but it can be obscene.
>>738378268it's all zoomerspeak
>>738376431I think the telltale sign of safe horny is a MILF who’s also a dommy mommy, or a goth girl. For some reason, those specific archetypes aren’t considered “problematic” by the usual suspects.
SAFE HORNY
Is she the one who started this stupid trend?
>>738376431The moment I saw people saying that /ss/ is "safe horny" is the moment I realized that this phrase means literally nothing. It's yet another variation of "thing I don't like".
>>738376431Corsets, stockings and garter belts are supposed to be safe horny, so why aren't they more common on games?
>>738376431>people still desperately try to make safe horny a word
>>738377963>>738379096I don't care how many soilent faggots act like faggots about her, Dimitrescu is hot and I want to mating press her.
>>738379236She's going to mating press you
>>738376937it's just woke
>>738377963It’s actually unsettling how many men in nerdy circles are exactly this image. I couldn’t imagine having my sexual fantasies being dictated by Twitter virtue signallers. You just know that they’d become the most depraved rapists and degenerates if given the chance too.
>>738379269lightwoke or darkwoke?
>>738379405>lightwoke or darkwoke?
>>738379295yeah at least us based alpha male 4channers are honest about our depraved "fantasies" unlike those cucks. we arent weird or evil cause all men are like this
>>738379236No, finding her hot is reddit now
>>738379149Shota is absolutely safe horny. It's a female and gay oriented fetish and you know damn well there is a double standard between it and loli.
>safe horn-ACK!Go back.
>>738379494Unsure if this is sarcasm, but it’s unironically true. People who are honest about their sexuality tend to have a healthier relationship with sexuality. Sexual repression just leads to the desire manifesting in ugly ways. It’s why a lot of militant male feminists end up becoming rapists for example.
>>738379678I've always seen it the other way around, they became feminists because they are rapists and doing so allows easier access to their targets.
>>738376431Anything that would actually give a normal guy a boner is bad horny. Everything else falls under safe horny. Gamers are subhuman filth that don't deserve even a simulacrum of sexual titillation, and HR departments know this.
>>738376937fucking suddoku asap
>>738380260>Anything that would actually give a normal guy a boner is bad horny. Everything else falls under safe horny.So by that logic, loli guro is safe horny because it wont make a normal guy horny.
>>738376431only trannyfaggots use wokolingo like that unironically therefore you are one>tl;drfaggot OP
>>738379529I like women with breasts and asses, i am become reddit
>posting in a bunkertroon thread
>>738379236How many times did you nut to "Last Villager"?
Why do you speak like retards, you're worse than the millennial redditors in 2012
>>738376431>safe hornyIt is a retarded concept that only exists because ugly FAGGOTS who can't separate fiction from reality are desperate to force people to think they are hot
>>738379541the reason why the term became popular is because it prefectly encapsulates reddit and twitter virtue signaling culture, and it doesn't matter if some twitterfag coined it
I don't think you can. If you try to make something like that you'll just make something that goes only halfway something that the audience wants usually.I think the whole "Safe Horny" trend is a way to do something that I am suspicious and sometimes equates with some crypto-pedophilic or ephebophilic tendencies that I've seen with people that are into animated programming like MLP and a few WB network cartoons - maybe stuff on Cartoon Network - where the fans later, in their adult years, start fetishizing characters that are not meant to be sexual in any way.I think of the artwork by Bruce Timm as an example of what people are looking for in "safe horny": women who have curves but are not too curvy but only offer silhouettes of a hint to a sexy woman (for example) - of course when you buy a book by Bruce Timm you'll find illustrated nudity.So "safe horny" is akin to when pornographers make "porn for women" which is often described as "pretentious softcore" that wants to allude to hardcore pornography but doesn't get there - it's missing something. In fact a friend of mine - a woman - once mentioned about how despite the "over the top gymnastics" done in straight porn for men, she enjoys the "phallic aggression" (she's a feminist, ergo her language) over the "gyno pretension."
Safe horny is just a term for retarded people to cry about [sexy thing] being popular.These two would be safe horny if their game was released today and was popular with normalfags.
>>738381829to continue a bit more: I don't play video games to be sexually excited and yet I don't mind if the developer interjects a sexual object of some kind in the game because they wanted to (for whatever reason). Although, I will say, that there's a point where I will think "i came for the mechanics/story but I didn't come for the T&A". And in some games, like Haydee, I simply shrug and go "I get it, you needed a hook. I'm here, I bought the game for the initial gimmick, and I'm now past that because the game is mechanically diffcult and intriguing." So context matters to give license for going at whatever extremity of "sexiness" and sexual provocation is to be had.Case in point: Mortal Kombat, as a series, to me, has always been something the rhymes with "girls with guns": it's taking violence, something deadly (like martial arts with very strong fighters), and combining with women that are very physically fit, are beautiful to look at, and have clothing that warns as well as titillates. Of course the apex of this was in MK9, since then it's been a gradual "modesty revision" along with nods to ID-politics to seal the deal - which is unfortunate.
woke faggot thread
>>738382141Totally. I'm starting to get the feeling that this entire board is pushing for accepting to people buy digital-only games with politically correct designs and messages (stories), and that it's all about permission structures.
>>738381997The biggest problem with it is that it makes since to describe the faggots that go "ooh mommy beat me up, step on me" since they're acting attracted to a woman in a faggy way that won't get them into hot water online, but it quickly got used to describe actual designs, which turned it into an even shittier buzzword that just gets thrown around to describe any design someone in particular doesn't like.
>>738381401>the reason why the term became popular is because it prefectly encapsulates reddit and twitter virtue signaling culture, and it doesn't matter if some twitterfag coined itthe reason it's retarded is because twitter has loli artists, futa artists, rape artists with 100,000+ followers and you somehow want to convince people twitterfags are safe horny or even safe horny is a thing
This website became worse t han 9gag, Reddit and Twitter combined.You guys used to be in the front, now you're below all 3 of those.
>>738379295>couldn’t imagine having my sexual fantasies being dictated by Twitter virtue signallers.You don't have to imagine because you already are cotnrolled by Twitter virtue signallers because you just vice signal the very opposite they like as a kneejerk reaction. at the end of the day, you too care a lot about "the normies" think because you feel the need to precisely counter signal them.
>>738382293You know that's an interesting observation because I can't help the sudden expressions - that are acceptable - where you have men playing the role (via text when posting on any social media website) of the sexually masochistic man to a dominatrix type or stand in. God forbid it was a man being the sadist (in BDSM context). I mean it's in the phrase: "Dommy Mommy" - as in Dominatrix Mom. Yeah put a no nonesense guy and he'll tell the dominatrix "listen I just like the costume because it gets me hard. It's going to be come off at some point." unless it's left on for arousal purpses. But there will be fucking and none of the "beating up the sub"
>>738382352That's not what I said at all, and I am very well aware that you can find all kinds of people on twitter. Safe horny virtue signalers are very much a thing. They are usually on reddit, twitter, resetera or write gaming articles. Apparently I have to clarify this.
>>738382352Not the same anon.I think it's a two-fold thing: appear sexually safe and to normalize the particular fetishes that they have - which are questionable in the end point of what they want which puts the second condition to be questionable hence why the first condition has to be met at all stops: it is SAFE sexual arousal and fetishes.
>>738382356I'll take it as a good sign unless you want to clarify.> 9gag was shit> Reddit was always shit> Twitter is not even a thoughtthis website sometimes goes in different, greener pastures that later on everyone else heads to (and has many times).
>>738376937>light chud
>>738376431>feet>pitsthere you go
>>738382356truth nuclear bomb
>>738381997But they ARE just woke safe horny garbage. You retards just refuse to acknowledge it.
I don't care if it's "safe" or "reddit" or whatnotIf I find it hot, I find it hot. I'm not going to let a seething 4chan autist who only jacks off to lolis get in the way of me liking big tits.
>>738384030The loli isn't. Loli is the antithesis of safe.
>>738376937Safe Horny is a marketing style, it has no inherent ideology attached to it aside from what will be most lucrative, it’d be more appropriate to call players Johns and devs pimps atp. Looks good at first, but you will feel the itching and burning in no time.
>>738384252B-but anon, some guy I saw on Twitter was being really gay about those hot characters. That means those designs are reddit soi slop. You HAVE to base everything you like and dislike off of what people on Twitter and 4chan think.
men raised by single mothers are becoming a problem
>>738378749Yeah I kind of stopped taking it seriously as a term when people started trying to apply it to Asuka, Haruhi, etc. fucking retarded shit to be saying girls going to prom with their dates are also children
>>738376431The key step is to understand what men like.Look at Tsukihime for a good example of conservative designs that appeal to men.Arcueid has a sweater and a long skirt, Ciel wears a nuns habit, Akiha wears a long dress shirt and skirt, the maids both wear full maid outfits. Yet they are all appealing to men. Because they were designed by men who understand what they like. If you don't understand what men like then it will just feel fake. There are characters that are practically naked that are less appealing than the Tsukihime cast.To put it simply.The design needs soul.
Is this safe horny lads?https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=16085577&tags=queen_marika_the_eternal+video+howlsfm+
>>738376431SHUT THE FUCK UPSHUTTHEFUCK UPSHITTING AROUND ALL DAYBOOM, THREAD'S BEEN HID DUDEBOOM, THREAD'S BEEN HID DUDEOP IS FUCKING GAAAaaay(sugar)For real though dude, shut the fuck up. You have nothing to add about this and your dumb ass is probably a bot.
>>738385104if men like this design so much why Dimitrescu became way more popular than these obscure tranime girls?
>>738376431It's easy. You make a character who is detailed and expressive so that women can relate to her, but who is also cute and appealing in a way that men will be attracted to. You give her an appearance which is modest and not whoreish, who is very beautiful, without being perfect. Give her a body type which fits her character and role rather than that of a porn star, but is naturally very attractive because she's fit and healthy, and perhaps provide a sensible reason for her to expose her body, rather than a male gaze style sexualization of the entire framing layered on top.
>>738385104See the fact is, this post is mostly what we call "your opinion man"You say "what men like", then you will come into threads to shit on men who like those designs that according to you are "less appealing"Yet if they are being posted and jacked off to by men, you were wrong in your very premise: "what men like" depends on the man. What you like is not the same as to what I like, for example, I don't find any of the girls in your image particularly appealing. Eyes too comically big, no standout characteristics beyond unnatural hair color.But I won't enter a thread and start crying they are "safe horny" or "reddit design", because I genuinely do not care if you like them. You are allowed to like things even without referring to a vague collective majority of "the men"
>>738377963Its this image right here, feminism disguised as gooner bait all that faggot mommy dommy fag shit
>>738379263nothing can beat the dick, anon, the pov blender porn I saw proves it
>>738385104Safe horny.
>>738376431I think "safe horny" epithet should be reserved for cases where female beauty is designed from an empowering feminist pov with little left to male gaze. Ellie from TLoU is not safe horny but characters from Hades II are.Anyway, I think the best way to satisfy both sides is to allow multiple outfits, some of which are skimpy, or really just have a diverse cast of characters for all tastes (just don't make them lame; sexiness is just another way of making your character cool). Also this whole discussion is dumb and Twitter people are not real.
>>738376431Plenty of fetishes that allow for it.
>>738377963There is not really any issue with this attitude at all which is why the artist felt the need to include a picture of a fat, bald, bespectacled man in order to convey their message. Male sexuality is in fact broadly violent, not universally, but largely, and even some women indulge this fascination. That doesn't mean men are evil and women are virtuous, or that there is anything wrong with expressing your true sexual instinct. It also doesn't mean there is anything wrong with limiting your outward display of sexuality to softer, more gentle forms. Not everything in nature needs to be celebrated, there are plenty of natural things we don't celebrate, like cancer, or mosquitos.
>>738382356fuck off tourist
>>738385316>decades of doujin content and fan art>vs flash in the pan meme that even normalfags forgot in a month
>>738387242He's right though, tourist or not. And only another tourist would defend present day fourchannel. It's dog shit. Old fags resent it and are here out of inertia.
>>738378886Thanks for breaking it down for me teach.
>>738376431Sometimes I feel like modern 4chan is only 10%-15% USA traffic even on a good dayAm I just insane?
>>738376431>offending people?boo hoothere will always be some cunts who hate you and pretend to be victims to shut you down - because your whole existence 'offends' them, but they are the bullies and you you know how to deal with the bullies - you never cave or you get bullied even more
>>738387853its not the country, its the age
>>738387853No, you are pretty accurate. A significant portion is just bots too.
>>738387853Most of the guys wait for real discussions like the Star Wars one yesterday. But yeah the number is too low. Between the bots and esl its hard to have a good chat.
>>738376431safe horny is good because it means all the obnoxious people who hate fun will stay away from the game and instead just seethe about it on social media
>>738387853Multiple years ago United States traffic was genuinely below 50%, I can’t imagine how bad it is nowAnd if you want to be even more technical the amount of actual traffic is probably like sub-30% but the amount of actual POSTS I guarantee you is disproportionately skewed towards South America, SEA, Canada, and Australia
>>738376431You will never make good designs if you are worried about offending people mr dev. If you make "safe" designs you'll make straight males angry for example so its not exactly safe.
>>738388290diversity is good
>>738376431>Start with an archetype, character idea first, not the body design. Use text for the description not pictures.>Keep conventional feminity components (waist hip ratio, etc).>Remember that if you don't make the clothes overtly sexual, you can still make a disproportionately sexual body type.
>>738376781>bad hornyAlso the term is Crime horny because people treat it like a petty crime when you do it.
>>738381997those characters would not be in xer gamethey would need smaller tits, manface and possibly vitiligo for that to fly
>>738384252big tits are not allowed in safe horny tho
>>738389038You say that and yet Dimitrescu, with her massive tits, is seen as the poster girl for "safe horny" spam.
>>738379236This!
>>738388978>they would need smaller titsLilith is literally flatter than a boyAlso safe horny is used for Dimitrescu who has giant tits as >>738389221 points outSafe horny is simply "thing I do not like and want to shame another anon about", because this is an abnormal place and thus looking normal and "safe" is considered an insult.
>>738389221she's borderline I'd sayother traits weigh up for the tits
Marvel Rivals feels very safe horny to me
Is my wife safe horny?
>>738389501>other traits weigh up for the titsSuch as?
it's easy to make safe hornythink of the roasties that complain about gamers and chudsnow make a character they can cosplay
>games don't have bimbos with fake tits, lips etcBimbos are unsafe horny, thus, we need more bimbos.
>>738389709height, looks evil, old
>>738390092Thank you for proving that this is all just vapid niggerbabble and that it literally means nothing.
>>738389709She's an amazonian dommy mommy.She's safe horny.cope&seethe.
>twitter buzzword thread
>>738389683Thats Courtneys wife
>>738378636it's character designs that want to do the 'sex sells ' shit, without actually making things sexy
>>738390092If being evil and tall are supposed to "make up for the tits", what are some flat as boards 6+ ft tall evil women in vidya?Stop climbing mirrors, it's a bullshit retarded term. Some fetishes have been more socially acceptable than others for all of history, and you bitching about it won't make it any more socially acceptable to say "I want to rape lolis" on public eventsJust keep it to yourself, like I do with many of my other less accepted fetishes.
>>738390597I find lady Dimitrescu very sexy, as I do Marvel Rival charactersAnd they did, indeed, sell.
>>738390671>Flat as board tall mommy villainsLusamine?
>>738390738Oh right, never played sun and moonIs she safe horny? Am I allowed to jack off to her by the grand 4chan council of porn?
>>738377043So something like this is safe horny?
>>738376431can you retards please stop shilling xitter buzzwords
>>738376937chud woke, unc
>>738376431what the fuck is "safe horny"?
>>738377963I unironically like women in their mid 30s to 40s with the occasional soft femdom.
>>738390597Nigger just say you don’t find the designs attractive without huffing your own cum fumes. You don’t like it when games feature coombait purely as a joke or “empowerment” sure whatever, you don’t need to use zoomer speak to say that. JUST TALK LIKE A NORMAL HUMAN YOU CRYPTO TRANSVESTITES.
>>738390671You don't get it.It's like the blizzard dei diamond chart. If they have big tits, they need other traits that are considered non-typical in the eyes of proponents of safe wokeI don't make the rules, that's just how it is
>>738391112You are NOT ALLOWEDWe PROHIBITED that
>>738390335retard
>>738390405/v/ is just twitter DLC at this point half the threads here are just twitter screenshots or trying to shill some meme term some retard there came up with
>>738391216What non typical traits does Shadowheart from bg3 have? And she is perfectly safe horny, nothing about her stands out and makes her unsafe to lust behindThere's nothing to "get", its a shitty buzzword
>>738378661Why do zoomcucks like this crawl to a millennial site to begin with? Do they just like to suffer?
>>738391379Add huge tits to her and you'll see what I mean. That wouldn't fly
>>738391531Huge tits are not a typical traitIs it about typical traits or not? At some point you will have to choose which hill to die on, moving goalposts every other post does not make your silly twitter speak look any saner
Number one sign of safe horny is when no one posts ingame images but always off model ballooned up trash from tranny artist
>>738391637>hill to die onYou talk like a redditor. No wonder you don't understand anything
>>738391374This. Damn near every site nowadays is just a downspout for twitter shit to flow down. At this point I wish the internet would be wiped completely and limited to only PCs in certain countries. We need a fresh start.
>>738391686I accept your concession, mongoloid retardTry to actually think about the definitions of the twitter buzzwords you spam here next time
>games aren’t allowed to be sexy anymore >and if they are they aren’t sexy to straight men>and if they are the character has to be woke in someway>and if they aren’t then it still doesn’t appeal to ME specifically Jesus Christ how do you niggers manage to make jerking off sound pretentious and political?
>>738376431Just make them regular horny and then all those who complain to kill themselves.
>>738378636Safe from being canceled for being sexist and misogynist. Safe = not going to get a twitter shitstorm.
>>738391412>Why do zoomcucks like this crawl to a millennial site to begin with? Do they just like to suffer?zoomers grew up with the internet after it already went to shit, while millenials witnessed the better times of the internet (even if they didn't fully appreciate or realize it)so zoomers are jealous that millenials had good shit, even though they try to copy surficial elements of 2000's culture and carry the bad shit more
>>738376431Here's something to consider, offense isn't something you give, it's something you take.
>>738381997>sexy succ>massive cleavage>thong leotard>safe hornyYou are a retard. Wokies would hate these designs if they came out today.
I don't give a fuck about "safe horny". Reddit doesn't get to say what I can and can't enjoy.
>>738391814If you think im in favor of "safe horny" as a concept, you are retarded. I'm just explaining what it is, in the true sense, not what its proponents say it is.Either you're a retard or a disingenuous wokie
>>738391823Blame the wokies ruining vidya.
>>738391823you can blame the other sidebut wait a minutei heard it's only one side that's into culture wars...how come?>>738379541hey that's the wakfu guy that got relevant since gamergate lol>>738381997a darkstalkers rerelease was still censoredand retards would tell you the "real appeal" of morrigas was her getting hurt like a cartoon character and not the erotic appeal
>>738391531most games never allowed their characters to have massive tits (at least by internet standards). The only games that regularly got away with that market themselves solely off sex appeal which now amounts to gacha games because coomers have no standards
>>738392067But what about the reddit attack on the wokies?
>>738392107>most games never allowed their characters to have massive titsJust look at any game from before the 2010s you dumb zoomer
>>738392107Isn't that what fan art is for?
>>738392002>I'm just explaining what it is,You failed, considering you flip flopped from "its when no boobs" to "its when boobs but non typical" to "its when typical but with no huge boobs"
>>738388219no, it means they'll pretend to be fans and convince the devs by doing the "look, i'm a REAL fan but-" schtick and then turn around and say you're the one who's bitching at something and it's not a big deal
>>738376431The retards in this thread that act like they can't comprehend what safe horny means are being disingenuous.>>738379149Don't pretend that terms aren't constantly being misused. Look at what goy"slop" has become.
>>738384030If every niche but “tolerated” fetish is safe horny and any vanilla attractive character is safe horny then what the fuck isn’t. Child gore? zoophilia? Are you only based if you intentionally jerk off to shit that pisses of most of the population?
>>738392448Nobody knows what safe horny means so they are asking
>>738392214I have and by the brainrotted coomer standards of you retards you’d probably bitch about it still being “woke”
>>738376937It's bud light
>>738392715>I have and by the brainrotted coomer standards of you retards you’d probably bitch about it still being “woke”You are dumb retard zoomer. If a character like Mai came out today all the wokes and trannies would freak out and kill themselves. Stop pretending to be retarded.
>>738392448Safe Horny as in "socially acceptable horny" , which means for example you can say "step on me mommy" but cannot say "I want to rape this girl" I do understandWhat I do not understand is why this means you should spam this term under any image of a character who isn't a loli, as if it was some kind of crime to be attracted to Dimitrescu or a Marvel Rivals character. You are not fighting the culture war, you are just being a clown in threads of things you do not like, a meme older than "safe horny" as a term.
>>738376431i am convivence that this is just an elaborate psyop to make the claim "the radical left want to remove YOUR coombait" look as stupid as possible. there is no way anyone with an Iq higher than their chromosome count could take the term "safe horny" seriously much less expect actual sane humans to respect it.
>>738392640Do they also not know what's a bookbag or jetpack?It's pretty self-explanatory if they can read.
>>738392626>Are you only based if you intentionally jerk off to shit that pisses of most of the population?this is 4chan what do you think the answer is
>>738392931But I say i want to rape this girl all the time
>>738392832Except you are wrong, as showcased by marvel rivals
>>738392997On 4chan, surely not irl...right?
Politics and culture war shit has utterly rotted the brains of both right and left wing retards and it's ruined the internet as a whole.
>>738392974ok then if its so self evident what IS safe horny?
>>738376431The problem with the safe horny movement is that it’s not that things leftists lust over are all Inherent unsexy. It’s just that the horny isn’t daring so it doesn’t step out of the confines of what would be seen as horny that validates women or validates queers. For instance the step on me mommy shit was edgy 30 years ago but because of how utterly feckless it comes to catering to men in western games step on me mommy comes off weak and submissive. Especially when the female design in question is basically just the body of a man but with a woman’s face a name. Obviously we’re talking about extremes here. In some ways horny is just a sexual overton window on where the zeitgeist is. 100 years ago bare ankle may have been a Porn Hub category and now in 2026 the idea of a woman having her ankles covered would be seen as schizophrenic to anyone that isn’t a return to tradition Reichmaxxer.
>>738393002>Except you are wrong, as showcased by marvel rivalsWokes absolutely shit and pissed themselves over black cat though. What the fuck are you even talking about. It wasn't even that long ago, why even attempt this kind of revisionism?
>>738393169Some trannies will always piss and shit themselves, just like /v/, its what they doBut the vast majority of the population (which is what makes safe horny safe) appreciated marvel rivals.
>>738392931>safe horny is when companies solely appeal to fringe degenerate weirdos>no wait it actually just means shit normies won't lynch you over
>>738392931People only call Dimitrescu safe horny because of her misandristic and dominating personality. That kind of shit is socially acceptable apparently.
>>738377043This list is fucking whack. Plus I see through you anti assfags that want to turn ass loving into a culture war around black people.
>>738393246>Some trannies will always piss and shit themselvesThat's the best litmus test thought, whether wokies and trannies like it or not. >But the vast majority of the population (which is what makes safe horny safe) appreciated marvel rivals.No? Most normal people like normal straight sex appeal, but that's not safe horny. Safe horny is woke horny. It really makes you wonder when everyone actually likes big tits and sex appeal why it's so incredibly rare in modern AAA games.
>>738393169>popular game?check>attractive characters?check>large budget?checkoh wow looks like games can still appeal to average straight men or what ever you were complaining about
>>738393251>when companies solely appeal to fringe degenerate weirdosSo, if its this, dimitrescu, shadowheart, etc etc are all fine as they appeal to a big amount of men?I'm using the definition that seems to be the most consistent one
>>738393470>oh wow looks like games can still appeal to average straight men or what ever you were complaining aboutWhat about games that aren't hero shooters or gachas?
I'll answer this semi-seriously.>titsMust be B-cups. No bigger unless the character is "thicc" (i.e. a disgusting fatass), and no smaller because that incurs pedo claims.>body typePetite/ short is out for stupid but obvious reasons. Anything else is probably okay.>skin colorLight bad, dark good. (This is even more true for the supposed appealed-to target.)>ethnicityWestern or East Asian only. Non-white thirdies are an absolute no-go.>clothing coverageMust be very high; you have to be very selective what you leave uncovered. Tits, ass, and genitals need to be wrapped up, but almost everything else is fair game so long as it's limited. Face and hair MUST be uncovered, even if it makes no sense.>"coding"Anything outside of normal. For example, androgyny is fine, while tradwives are right the fuck out.>trans/ maleFemboys and traps are not allowed. You pretty much have to make any trans character deliberately unappealing. Cis men have very little restriction.Once these conditions are met, you can safely sexualize the character in subtle ways and let internet perverts do the rest. Focus on your character's lovely and surprisingly dextrous feet, or drop a handful of bread crumbs indicating that they are weak to anal, or just give them some good old DSLs. Add some franchise popularity, and the magic WILL happen.
>>738393497>dimitrescu >appeal to a big amount of men
>>738376876mmm, chocolate bnuuy...
>>738393448So Dimitrescu, the poster girl for safe horny, is not sade horny, as the great majority of heterosexual men do find her attractive?It always comes to either everyone is using an incorrect definition, or everyone is misusing the term, which ultimately leads to the term being completely meaningless.
remember when breastmilk was a xitter meme? does that now mean that wanting to drink from a girl's tit is now classified as "safe horny"?
>>738393572Yes, you absolutely delusional retard>But I personally don't like her!Which leads us to the TRUE meaning of the term safe horny: whatever I don't like
>>738393071Anything that is made to display sexual attraction without being inoffensive or objectifying women while putting men in a submissive role. No, anything that isn't loli doesn't mean it's safe horny. Mommy dommy bullshit or being used as a stepstool is safe horny.I see no reason why terms like safe horny or safe edgy shouldn't be valid.
>>738393619>>738393702>So Dimitrescu, the poster girl for safe horny, is not sade horny, as the great majority of heterosexual men do find her attractive?No they don't. Do you have anything to actually back this up?
>>738392107>most games never allowed their characters to have massive tits
>>738381997It's a completely made up word astroturfed by (((certain people))) to get more namecalling opportunities.
Designs like this was run of the mill back in the day,nowadays it gets highlighted like some kind of achievement
>>738393738Yes, the amount of porn, the fact that most streamers slapped her ass with the mosquito killer, so much it became a meme, the fact she's been modded into other games, the fact that the marketing exploded over her in the trailer.Do you have anything to the CONTRARY?Dimitrescu and Bazz from Concord are not the same thing
>>738376876FRAN GAVE ME A BROWN FETISH FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
>>738379149I once saw some faggots on there say that ladies with pointy noses was safe horny. It's a nothing word used by the mentally retarded to feel superior to other mongoloids on social media.
>>738376763One is made to appeal to trannies and SJWs and the other straight men.And when its made for straight men but the troons like it, they act like it was made for them: see Bayonetta.
>>738379539If shota is safe horny then people would clearly be making leagues more games with it or shilling such things than they already do. Simple point is that no one gives a rats ass about shotas to the extent that people do lolis.
>>738393497no you see dimitrescu is bad because she was specifically designed to pander to a specific fetish that isn't widely hated. meanwhile shadowheart is bad because idk she's boring. games are only allowed to be weird and degenerate if they pander to MY fetishes, anything else is woke medaling
>>738392107d cups was standard before normalfag era
>>738379539>wanting to fuck little boys is "safe horny"nigger where? epstein's island?
>>738376431You can use a rooty tooty point and shooty to stay safe, and a pencil to make horny designs
>>738393874>the fact that most streamers slapped her ass with the mosquito killerThat's a funny meme thing to do. >Yes, the amount of pornNow compare it to Jill, Claire, Ada, Ashley, etc. She really isn't that popular in the grand scheme of things. Not among the RE girls. The whole "hurr durr everyone is horny for Dimitrescu" is so fucking over blown it's insane. Just look at the actual numbers instead of spouting nonsense based on literally nothing.>Dimitrescu She is not far behind. She really isn't all that popular. She absolutely does not appeal to most men.
>Tall and muscular>Made trannies and journalists seethe So where does schrodinger's horny here belong then?
>ctrl+f>no KrystalThis board disgusts me more every day.
>>738386705>Male sexuality is in fact broadly violentBy what retarded feminist definition is big tiddies and youthful faces "violent"?
>>738394387>>Made trannies and journalists seetheThat means she's unsafe horny.
>>738394163Have you heard any complaint about little boys being raped on Epstein's island? Nobody gives a fuck.Even if it's little girls, people care about it about as much as they care about Epstein evading taxes. It's time for you to realize that you're the only person whose first name you know who also thinks that raping little boys is bad actually.
>>738394391anon you and i both now if furries were brought up in this godforsaken thread they'd be thrown into the "safe horny" camp if only because its a cheep way to dunk on them more
>>738376431Yes, Ninja Gaiden 4 did it with Ayane.She's more covered than ever, but they used semi-transparent mesh and a weird cleavage hood that emphasizes the underboob
>>738394229>Now compare it to Jill, Claire, Ada, Ashley, etcThats a whole other argument and goalpost>Based on literally nothingYou are yet to provide priof that the majority of men find her unattractiveI actually have things to support my claims, while all you have is "huuuhh but this other hot girl..."Yes, more than one girl can be hot and some can be more popular than others, and you sre still wrong lmaoDimitrescu has an attractive design.Now, she can also be safe horny, depending on the definition of the word you use. But trying to lamp her together with characters like bazz as "ugly and only for woke weirdos" outs you as a complete retard who just spams the retarded term for snything he doesn't likeAlso you didn't even answer about shadowheart. Is she only for woke trans weirdos too? Or perhaps she is not safe horny at all, she is unsafe horny?
>>738387742>>decades of doujin content and fan artEvwryone forgot about these sluts because it got completely mogged by Saber and her clones.Dimitrescu is still more popular and relevant than these shitters.
>safe horny thing i don't like>unsafe hornything i likeshrimple ass
>>738394701Your low verbal IQ showing
>>738394387>japanese muscle mommy>chinese muscle mommy
>>738394701It's more like>unsafe horny>things the chuds probably like, even if it appeals to some or most other people too>safe horny>things the chuds probably don't like, even if its appeal is niche or questionable
>>738394584>You are yet to provide priof that the majority of men find her unattractiveThen why does she have the least amount of porn then? How does that makes sense to you? >Thats a whole other argument and goalpostNo you brought it up as a metric of how many people find her attractive. Since she has the less porn than Jill, Claire, Ada, Ashley, etc. that must mean she is less appealing than them. Or why even bring up the amount of porn in the first place? So now you lost the argument about her popularity with actual data it's "moving the goalpost" fucking pathetic. >Dimitrescu has an attractive design.In what way? She has an ugly face. Ugly hair. Sickly pale. Freakishly tall. What exactly about her makes her so attractive to "most men"? >You are yet to provide priof that the majority of men find her unattractiveIsn't the fact that she is by far lass popular than Jill, Claire, Ada, Ashley, etc. proof enough that she isn't that popular? Or what proof do you have that she is popular and found attractive by most men. I'm waiting.
>>738394387last nip game with real sex appeal
>>738394954No the actual metric is>Unsafe Horny>things that make wokes and trannies seethe>Safe Horny>things that wokes and trannies like
>>738379236This. If I find a voluptuous mountain of a woman, I am going to claim that mountain in the name of my penis.
>>738376431>SAFE HORNY DISCUSSION>https://twitter.com
>>738376431A women needs one or more of the following to not be danger-horny:>Overweight (this includes huge ass/breasts)>Man-shaped>Middle-aged>Brown>Heavily clothed>Gurl-boss>Lesbian (western style)Pick your poison.
>>738395461>Lesbian (western style)Why cowboy lesbians in particular?
>>738390865Yes. This is safe horny
>>738395461>>Middle-aged>>BrownSign me up.
>>738395040>Then why does she have the least amount of pornI am pretty sure Dimitrescu has more porn than her daughters and of mother miranda, all more conventional and in rhe same gameYou are trying to prove she is unattractive to the average man, not that she is less attractive than another girl. Thus, saying "she has less than ada wong!" Is a non sequitur. You have failed to prove your aegument.>she is less appealing than themSure, that can be true. What is this proving? Again, you seem to not be intelligent enough to understand your own argument. You are supposed to prove men find her unattractive, not that other girls are more attractive>Or what proof do you have I presented it. Your reply so far has been "yeah but other girls are even more attractive!" Which sure, but I really don't see how that disproves my pointNow either prove that the thousands of images of porn were made by people who find her unattractive, or present a survey where men report her design as unacctractive, or just accept you are wrong and have no arguments besides whataboutism and moving goalposts (from "men don't find her attractive" to "men find other girls more attractive")
>>738395721>I presented it. It was dogshit and easily refuted. >Sure, that can be true. What is this proving? So she is not that popular then. So she is not found attractive by most men then. >Now either prove that the thousands of images of porn were made by people who find her unattractiveProve that these images appeal to most men first.
>>738395849>and easily refuted.Then refute it lol>Prove that these images appeal to most men first.With 10k images on r34 she is in the top 1% of characters with most pornYour "refutation" to this was "there are characters in the top 0.1%!"
>>738395997>With 10k images on r34Why lie?
>>738395050
>>738376431
>>738396095Search "Alcina_Dimitrescu" you retarded teglodyteNo shit you have been arguing a losi g position, you didn't even look up right
>>738395124breast milk was popular on xitter for a notable amount of time. does that mean lactation is a woke fetish?
nta but here>>738396095your website sucks
>>738396345Ok now what?
>>738396404>nta but hereHow's that compare to the other RE girls?
>>738393276they're just racist pedos what else is new.
>>738396414What do you think you are doing, retard?Just concede the argument and stop being dishonestPersonally, I prefer ada wong anyways
>>738376431It pains me to say as an unironic nude mod/bikini armorchad, but most people grow more attached with a tastefully sexualized design rather than one that's just ass and titties all the way through. For some reason outright lewd designs get in the way of normalfag attachment, probably due to some kind of madonna-whore complex. However a completely conservative design requires too much imagination.Basically, your best bet is to make a design which concedes one major appeal point to horny while keeping the rest conservative. From there you want to create an actually good character that creates a natural fandom (this is the hard part)You can also skip all of this if the character is ubiquitous enough (eg. princess peach) and farm porn with a completely conservative design.Actually thinking about it more, some good porn farming happens in areas with fairly conservative designs but sexual atmospheres (eg. Helltaker)I need to go back to sleep because this is getting incoherent, but in this way you make safe horny sexy while still being safe. If you're a bad enough dude, you can even have unsafe horny invade safety by making an unsafe character ubiquitous enough that people stop questioning it (eg. 2b), leaving it to implications (eg. Zora nudity) or by presenting your horrible fetishes as horror instead of sex appeal (eg. Berserk, Made in Abyss)
>>738396632Now compare that to the other RE girls.
>>738396486>>738396717>Gets btfo>"B-but what about other numbers?"
>>738376937We dual wield it here
>>738396345they're intentionally using paheal instead of xxx which has drastically less usage and less images as a result. that place is a wasteland of 3d pedophile sfm and deviantart tier fetishes. don't listen to these bad faith idiots.
>>738376431kill yourself respectelves
>>738396783>a lot less popular than other RE girls >literally no proof that "most men" find her attractive >but some random streamer slapped her ass once. That's literally all you got.
>>738396717I already addressed this argumentYes, RE girls are very popular and some are in the 0.01% of most fapped characters, I even mentioned Ada wongNow what? Lady D is still hot and lusted after by many
>>738396945many != most
>>738396690On second thought I think a better explanation than "leaving it to implications" would be "making it such a natural part of the setting that people don't question it" because that can also include things like how fromsoft does it desu
>>738397008She is in the top 1% of most imagesThat seems like most to meDo you have a survey that proves that actually most men do not like her?And mind you, you STILL have not addressed shadowheart. Is she safe horny?
>>738396923Yes, the character from 1 singular game from 5 years ago is going to have less fanart than the characters that have been series staples for the past 20+ years. If popularity is such a big factor, then Lisa and Maggie Simpson are as safe horny as they come.
>>738397134>>And mind you, you STILL have not addressed shadowheart. Is she safe horny?>plain, inoffensive to trannies and wokes Off course she is safe horny, why do you even need to ask. >She is in the top 1% of most imagesis 10,0833 out of 14,680,570 1%?
>>738391975You'd get "WHY DID THEY COVER HER ASS WITH TIGHTS WOKE WOKE WOKE."
>>738397430Can you read? I didn't say her images are 1% of the total, I said she is in the top 1% of characters with more images to their nameAt this point I am not sure if you are just baiting me with continuous intentional retardation or if you really are this stupid.
>>738397427>If popularity is such a big factor, then Lisa and Maggie Simpson are as safe horny as they come.Uhh... it was actually the opposite. Popularity has nothing to do with safe horny. And usually safe horny things don't have real mass appeal. Safe Horny = Popular was the other guys argument.
>>738397597>Popularity has nothing to do with safe hornyYour claim is that safe horny "only appeals to a few woke trannies" , so clearly popularity is important to your argument, even if anon got confused and reversed the argument.
>>738396923I find her attractive and I'm a man. I don't care about who reddit or 4chan or Twitter says. If I'm going to masterbate I'm going to masterbait.
>>738397556>Can you read? I didn't say her images are 1% of the total, I said she is in the top 1% of characters with more images to their nameBut it means that on average, most people don't see her images.
>>738376431Any design is inappropriately sexual if believe hard enough.
>unironically using rule34 as a gauge for what is "safe horny" jesus christ this thread is fucking brain dead
>>738397685>"only appeals to a few woke trannies"I never said only.
>>738393518>why can't games have attractive characters anymore?>but they do>yeah but i hate those gamesi can't even be mad at you
>>738397773If the safe horny character got no porn then it would confirm they are an industry plant that failed
>>738397736On average people don't browse r34 at allWe are taking a sample, if Lady D is unattractive how dis she get 10k images, more than most characters? Were they commissioned and drawn by people who dislike her?Anon its not hard, she is attractive, this is not a super niche opinion, its a common opinion. Now, you can dislike her, nothing wrong with that, and depending on definition (no the one you were using) you could even call her safe horny.But trying to pretend she is not popular is just deranged
>you have to be a woke tranny to want to fuck evil old women/thread
>/v/ troons arguing about shitty rule34 porn
>>738397989>Were they commissioned and drawn by people who dislike her?Why would they do that?
so which is it? is safe horny pandering to fringe fetishes that no normal man would have or is it actively avoiding shit that's considered too deviant and would piss off most people?
This thread is incredibly gay and retarded. Post vidya girls you want to viscerally creampie instead of arguing over Twitter shit.
>>738397989>But trying to pretend she is not popular is just derangedIt's just that "most men" don't find her attractive. That's all. Many != most.
>>738397875The argument started here >>738393251The word "solely" was used, solely also means "only">That wasn't me!Then read the reply chain you deliberately entered to argue against me, because that was the point I was refuting from the beginningNow fuck off.
>>738398106Who is most men? Gay men?
>>738398065>or is it actively avoiding shit that's considered too deviant and would piss off most peopleWould big tits and cleavage be considered deviant and piss most people off?
>>738378636White men
>>738398106Can you prove that in this case many doesn't correspond to most as well? Or are you just nitpicking hoping to snivel out of the conversation after being btfo? (And exposed about lying on porn images, of all things you could fucking lie about)
Why dont people make danger horny threads?
>>738398282>Can you prove that in this case many doesn't correspond to most as well?Because many doesn't mean most, retard.
>>738397893>character designed to appeal to a specific fetish has less porn in total than characters made for mass appeal>this proves they're a DEI woke industry plantalso don't you fags consistently act smug for liking niche shit wouldn't this imply that shit like loli is also "safe horny" due to not being broadly appealing?
>>738398286Blue board.
>>738398339Many can correspond to most, they are not oxymorons retard.So I ask again, can you prove in this case they do not correspond?
>>738388374This except no
>>738398175no but loli would definitely piss people off which anons here also consider "unsafe horny"
>>738398417Can you prove that they do?
>>738398286/d/ and /trash/ are down the hall to your left
>>738398487I don't need to, the original argument is that she only appeals to a woke fringe, all I needed to win the argument was prove that wrong, which I did (which is why you lied about the image count)This is just me trying to see if you have any proof whatsoever to your claim or you are just inventing for yourself what the male collective desires.
>>738376431It was a meme that originally showed up I think for SF6. It is an attempt to continue to complain and seethe after getting ones way.>GRRRR Y NO SEXY WIMMIN>game does it>UMMMM THAT DOESN'T COUNT! STILL WOKE! SAFE HORNY!Because seething is the point and it generates a pleasurable reaction in the brain.
>>738398747You know exactly what it means, and if you don't, you're low IQ
>>738398551Ok but I'm sure there's plenty of dangerously horny characters to talk about on /v/
I think having a strong, sadistic psycho bitch having her way with me like I'm a piece of meat is hot.I also think that subduing and having my way with a strong, sadistic psycho bitch is equally hot.
>>738398862rivals has several characters that look like that and you retards still found a way to call it woke
>>738398747It means you're a fucking normie newfaggot.
>>738398681>I don't need to,Yes, if you say "most" you should mean most. Now actually prove that it is "most". I wouldn't even argue that "most men" find Jill attractive even if she is by far the most popular of all the RE girls in terms of total numbers. I'm sure many do, but most? That takes a lot. Saying that "most men" find Lady Dimitri attractive is just a massive overreaching hyperbole.
>>738398973Marvel rivals doesnt have women with their tits out so its woke. Cope.
They made it easy to spot nowadays because the west is so tranny coded the women dont even have breast anymore
A lot of our problems would be solved if people who unironically said phrases like "safe horny" were killed
>>738399030So>You were wrong about the fringe woke thing>You were wrong about her porn appeal>You cannot prove most men dislike herWhat are you doing then? I presented my arguments as to why I can infer most men like her, you on the other hand failed to refute a single one, and don't have ANYTHING on your side
>>738376431I think Arknights Enfield is safe horny.
>>738376706the average femdom bro is older than you
>>738399035>woke is when no tits>woke is when tits but woke character>woke is when tits but slightly coveragain if you retards got EXACTLY what you wanted you'd still try and move the goal post purely because it came out post 2014
>>738398973????
>>738399153>You cannot prove most men dislike herYou haven't proved that most men like her.
>>738399287This is danger horny because the costume is something a child would wear
>loli is safe horny because its fans are obnoxious and normal men hate itis that what i'm suppose to get from this thread?
>nah man it is safe horny>nah man it is bad horny>nah man it is straight horny>gay horny>blue horny, green horny, one horny two hornyYou guys are fucking tards.
>>738378636safe from the woke hordes that wants to cancel (You)
>>738399529I'm feeling brown horny personally.
maybe the real safe horny was the UNC goygoon keyed gem we made along the way
>>738399287>put jeff in maid outfit he shakes his ass for everyone>put deadpool in maid outfit he shakes his ass for everyone>put elsa in a maid outfit she drinks tearivals is peak safe horny trash plus tranny pandering
>>738376431not reading the entire thread but hidden panties >>>>> spats >>>>>>> vulgar panties.
>>738376431>howdoing more lolis in bloomers.
>>738399750What do you mean by vulgar panties? Either way I agree that hidden panties are the best but only if you end up getting a couple quick glimpses of them here and there.
>>738400043vulgar panties are panties that were exposed for everyone that wanted to see it.
>>738389683She's a FUCKING DISGRACE. Bring back Ginger Shelly!
>>738400256Ahh, that makes since. Yeah hidden is still top tier, though sometimes it's nice when they're on display.
>>738399750>>738400452Anything other than a black void. Or characters magically turning invisible when your point your camera up.
>>738381997Well, they made them uglier in the newer games and in the american cartoon, so they weren't safe horny.
To me it is grabbing something that people usually don't find sexy, and you can push, so you are not promoting common standards.If you have a game full of granies doing strip dances and being literal sex objects in game, nobody would complain because they are not standard, is safe to do it.
>>738397427NTA but the list is botted, they aren't true numbers
>>738376431Just enough midriff to expose the navel. It’s extremely horny and completely safe.
>>738400978american puritans and censors are woke?
>>738400978fucking netflix adaptation strikes again
>>738376431Fat ass but no butt crack.
>>738376763No, no. I think I get it. It's like Islam, the only things that are bad are what you are willing to beat and kill people over and what is safe is what you are willing to kill someone who is trying to accuse you of. Like being gay, haram. But fucking boys in dresses, safe.
>>738404452?????
>>738398286can't pretend to be the victim of the woke left in those threads
>>738376431Safe Horny is a retarded term since it is too vague to actually convey what's really the problem, so the meaning varies from person to person. Kinda like with normalfag, which is used from people criticizing people who only watch marvelslop but you also have scat-tier fetishists using the term to criticize anyone who's not as mentally ill as them.
