Okay it wasn't THAT good.
Remake/reimagining every decade for the rest of your lives.
polymarket odds on the remake having head tracking when moving the logo in the main menu?
>>738379483I have never seen any franchise entry so overrated that it killed the IP. Fuck Star Fox 64.
>old... bad?
>>738379483Yes it was
>>738382592>19 years of retreadingnah. not that good.
>>738379483It is.
It was that good, but not so good that a sequel couldn't have expanded on it. People literally just wanted more of this game and Nintendo couldn't find a way to do that?
>>738379483This is why I hate remakes, now I have to listen to all you niggers and normalniggers shit our your stupid opinions on my favorite games
Agreed. It was very fun, but not so good that it needed to be remade twice. Why is it so difficult to make a follow-up?
>>738385615Assault with half the on-foot/tank levels and 3x as many arwing levels would have completely secured the franchise as a nintendo staple
>>738379483It was though.Only its graphics are outdated nowadays.Otherwise it is still a top tier game.
I played it a launchIt was really good
>>738379505>Remake/reimagining every decade for the rest of your lives.3DS was not a remake, just like OOT. They were a fresh coat of paint over the exact same game.