[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1778109989376996.jpg (293 KB, 777x462)
293 KB JPG
why is Nintendo against creating Star Fox sequels?
>>
why make new thing when you can make old thing and sell it for same price
>>
File: OREWA.jpg (1.04 MB, 1000x1212)
1.04 MB JPG
>>738406951
Because they're still recovering after abandoning the main character 20 years ago.
>>
>>738406951
They tried four times, it didn't work
>>
>will rehash Star Fox 64 four times
>won't rehash F-Zero GX even once
Why is Nintendo like this?
>>
>>738407710
It,'ll probably happen. This rehash is probably just experimenting with younger devs, which is why it's a much more "cinematic" take
>>
>>738406951
The series started out as an arcade style rail shooter and they've never really known how to expand on that without losing its core gameplay.

>>738407710
The thing about F-Zero GX is that they felt like it was too perfect as a game and they also didn't know how to expand on F-Zero until F-Zero 99.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.