It needs to be said that the new Arwing models are pure fucking sex
the new proportions are so fucked up. ship is 3x times bigger than they were in 64
>>738417294i dont like all the greebling on the blue parts
I like the animal decals.
>>738417294I think there are way too many striations and what not. Comes off as trying too hard to look modern. Today's high end aircraft don't look like that. That being said I love that each pilot puts personal touches on their planes like paw marks and wings and such
Yes, they look fine as fuck.>>738418000So what? It makes sense that the ship is big.
>>738417294it's so blocky it almost looks like a minecraft build
>>738417294There is only one fighter jet that I would fuck, and it's not that one.
>>738417294The arwing is as much of a character as Starfox team itself and probably the only thing that was objectively improved about the game.It could have been better, but could have been much worse.
>>738417294Nah, it's too busy. All those useless panels.
>>738417294>The G-Diffusers open up so they don't overheatLove that detail
I want to know which studio is behind this game. Their decisions make absolutely no sense. The Arwings are cute, almost chibi-style, looking more like toys than war machines, while the creatures inside them are all freaks straight out of horror games.It’s the opposite of Star Wars, where a retarded George Lucas kept the ships dirty and worn-out for adult fans, but added cute furry creatures to attract kids.Pic: Star Fox manual (SNES)
>>738417294I love the little personalized touches some haveyou can't see all of it but whatever Pigma painted on his, it has dollar signs
>>738418864I do like to believe that those models are what James McCloud and his crew flew in when the Pig betrayed his ass.
>>738417294I'm not a designer but there's immediately something about their proportions that look wrong to me. I think it's too busy looking. What the hell is the utility of all the compartments and cuts on every piece? Why can't it just be a style of design that the ships have on their outside, and all the "techy" stuff is put inside of the "box"?I mean it's like cars and computers. You wouldn't want a car to look like the inside of its hood. You want it to look presentable.
>>738418864yeah they look stubby in a way that doesnt mesh with the rest of the visual treatment of thembtw they have a digital version of the manual with great quality copies of the arthttps://www.nintendo.co.jp/clvs/manuals/common/pdf/CLV-P-SADGE.pdf
>>738417294It's just a 3D model of the toy, you know that right?
>>738417294Yes, that makes it even more of a crime to stink up their cockpits with taxidermied animals.
>>738418978>James' Arwing has one big and one small pawprint next to each otherThat was cute.
>>738417294>Falco's Arwing has wings painted on the wingsLovely, eagerly waiting for a Command revamp loved the Skyclaw and Bullfrog.
>>738417294the only way you could think that looks good is if you're literally 7 years olg
>>738418864>I want to know which studio is behind this gameThey definitely outsourced it.
What was his problem?
I'm 12 years olg and what is thisdon't ban me I'm thrice that age
>>738420726Something's wrong with his arwing's G-Diffuser
overly designed. Why does it need so many lines and triangles?
>>738421108https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GreebleGeorge Lucas basically described them as "lines to make mechanical parts look more complex than they are because we're retards who don't actually understand how engineering works," and they've been utilized in every single sci-fi work since then. Then you look at the fucking game controllers we use these days and they are explicitly made to NOT show a bunch of exposed screws and panels.
>>738417294bleh i think there's too much unnecessary detail, too busy. I feel like the Arwing should retain its ultra sharp silhouette regardless of how advanced grafix get.
>>738421298There was a period in the 90s and 00s when game controllers WERE designed to look like that though. Sometimes greebles and exposed mechanical parts are just in fashion.
>>738421298to be fair, it makes sense as an artistic decision in the context of trying to differentiate your new movie from what was then the standard very smooth and streamlined flying saucer/space rocket look. the problem is it became the default for any kind of futuristic design language
>>738420726He got too cocky.
Say what you'd like about Assault, I always had a soft spot for its Arwing design even if it doesn't beat out the older ones.
>>738420726>w-w-wing damge!
>>738417294I hate it, looks like a toy. I prefer Assault's design.
>>738417294it doesn't look very sleek desu
>>738422664They are pretty cool, specially the Landmaster
>>738417294The ships are the one thing I'm fine with. Starfox 64 is better in many ways but the ships were too small relative to the pilots.
>>738417294I think starlink's arwing design is a decent redesign on the old arwing. Save the weapon ports on the wings
I like all the designs desu, that and the Great Fox are one of my favorite things in gaming.
>>738417294Why is there a hole on top?
>>738427873It facilitates the carburetor’s function by smoothing airflow into the venturi, allowing for a precise air-fuel mix, and often providing intake resonance to improve efficiency.
>>738422664>>738425063They feel like Star Fox got a lot of money for the Dinosaur Planet job.
>>738419953I hope that's true because id like to buy one
>>738418000Rather, in 64 their heads were three times bigger so you could see them in the muddy lowres game
>>738417294not a fan of the tall cockpits
>>738426329>BBCDo russians really?
>>738428842Prince Tricky's parents are fucking loaded. They probably had mountains of gold and artifact shit lying around that they didn't care about because they're dinosaurs.
