What went wrong with Bungie after REACH?
>after reach
>>738447861>afteroh no no no. he unironically liked Reach-around. disgrace.
>>738448173kek i heavnt heard that one in a while.>>738447861i honestly never really liked reach. i didnt hate it but it was really just an eh that was okay i guess which at the time was basically terrible for a halo game. the armor was great and the customization was awesome. but the campaign was boring. the desaturation and art style shift felt alien and way too far removed from prior games. i like the multiplayer to fuck around in a few times a year and enjoy the custom game modes with randoms but thats about it. it should be mentioned again the armor was good.
>what if we take halo's cool art style and fuck it up with tacticool milslop overdesign>and make everything scratched to high fuck like it was in a cement mixer>while also reducing the cool action movie dialogue with "ROGER THAT BRAVO FRAGGING A CHARLIE TANGO DOWN" nonsensePeople shit themselves to death over 343i changing designs but this atrocity of an AR is fine and "classic" because zoomers played Reach when they were 8 after they came home from school.
>>738448431I was 13 sir.
>>738448431>while also reducing the cool action movie dialogue with "ROGER THAT BRAVO FRAGGING A CHARLIE TANGO DOWN" nonsenseJoe Staten was responsible for the cool action movie dialogue and he didn't work on Reach
I still think it was fun despite stupid shit like reticle bloom and armor lock. Compared to what came after its a fucking masterpiece.
>>738448431Why is the magazine like that.
