What the fuck? This was REALLY good.
>>738818937Too many cutscenes and pointless characters, original was better.
Im so happy it exists. Snap 64 was already a joy to play and this added more everything. Maybe Im just shit at it but I had to really grind out sections to advance the mapWish stick drift wasn’t so prevelant because I had so much fucking trouble aiming the camera
>>738819047
>>738818937It really is.>>73881904764 is the better "pick up and play" thing, but very shallow in nature, its a 2-3 time waster at best, New is the objectively better game, more interations, more mons, more enviroments, only thing that lacked was real time evos.
its pretty good. i just dont care because i like commanding them to fight and kiss one another
>>738818937It’s actually amazing that the original snap had less than half of the gen 1 Pokédex, yet gained such a strong following.
>>738820610I think it's BECAUSE it was so barebones that it gained such a following. It was a good game, but it was severely lacking in content. If it had been more "complete", people wouldn't have been begging for a sequel as much.
>>738819047I don't think it was as good as the original either but I still liked the new one a lot.
This game is way too hard. Without using a guide I'm just barely, narrowly reaching the threshold unlocking the next part. Sometimes I have to replay a level like 4 times.
>>738819076sit in a spinny chair and use the motion controls
>What the fuck? This was REALLY good.
who's your snapper /v/?brunette white girl for me
>>738821738What have you been playing recently?
>>738821738Barrierstation is a plastic box with no content according to the sony CEO.
>>738821954Probably not demake slop.
If New Snap exists why can't they make new original Star Fox games?
>>738821954factorio
>>738821814but there are only two White people in that photograph, anon.
>>738818937Yeah it’s fantastic if you liked snap on the 64There’s so much content in it
This was the exact moment I learned this Pokemon is pronounced "my-low-tick" instead of "mill-aw-tick".
>>738820052I liked the arcade style of Snap more. I wished New Snap just had way more short levels instead of those really long feeling levels.But maybe they weren't actually that long in comparison to the original and that's just how I felt.
>>738824196I don't think they were very long, but they were completely full of content and secrets.
>>738821738WHy do you shartyfags always post selfies
>>738822047This isn't a remake. Its a completely new game.
>>738818937I liked the original a decent amount. I bought this but I haven't played it yet, gonna get to it next month
I bought this when it came out but never finished itwhat am i missing
It's one of my favourite Switch games but it filtered out those who don't understand score-attack games.
>>738818937I remember playing it when it came out and thinking it was pretty soulless compared to the original. Like the UI is now flat white mobile looking shit with zero flair. The music and voice acting just aren't as good as 64. Anti-soul fog. Humans look gross. Sluggish camera movement that has a slight jitter. A 10 minute baby tutorial when 64 was basically instant. And very grindy too, I had trouble unlocking the next areas despite playing the same level like 5 times.Shit nobody cares about but me apparently. I love the original so much I play it every year. But I can't be bothered to replay the new one ever.
i want it but cant justify $60 for a 6 hour game
>>738833586lol6 hours he says
iirc they added a free update that essentially doubled the size of the game... I need to go back and replay this, are there any improvements on Switch 2?
>>738818937Being able to move the switch around and take pictures like it was a real camera was fucking kino.
>>738835580No need, looks and runs high res and 60fps across the board on switch 2
>>738832202>soullessThe part I disliked the most was that pokemon barely reacted when you threw shit at them.I guess they wanted to tone down the animal abuse optics, but it throwing stuff at pokemon for them to not react felt pretty ehhhhhhh.
>>738836238What are you talking about?They react to everything
>>738819047Original was kinda bs>ooohhh this one looks way better! This has to be a record breaker!>somehow less pointsOnly way to get me to replay Snap 64 is if I install a mod that tells me how many points each photo is worth before I pick them
The boss levels sucked, and a lot was too esoteric, which sucked, cause the point thresholds were too high
