play classic tomb raider
No.But I will goon to classic lara croft
>>738830926based and good artist
play the angel of darkness
>>738830803What's up with the NTR shit?
>>738831417lmfao i didn't even notice thatmaybe gamers were the real cuckolds along the way or something
>>738830803Those games suck pretty bad. The marketing is near perfect though.
Fantastic games.Gamers can't get past the gooner marketing though
>>738831805>Those games suck pretty badpeople who say this are usually just bad at them
>>738831805Other way around. First game is a masterpiece and some of the others are very good. The marketing did a good job misrepresenting what kind of game it was and what kind of character Lara was. The playboy sexdoll from the marketing and the bad bitch she is in the games are baically completely seperate characters who have nothing to do with eachother.
>>738830803TR1 is one of the best games ever made
>>738830803I am! Currently working my way through The Golden Mask after playing 1, UB and 2. It's really fun because I hadn't played either of the expansion packs before they came out in the remaster.Pity the visual upgrades are botched as fuck, I just play on original graphics
>>738830803honestly I've had more fun with custom levels than with the og games
>>738833490>>738833612<3i'm glad you like them!
>>738833612I feel like the remaster does a good job, but there's only so much you can so with a game like Tomb Raider with the rigid way it is designed
>>738833759My issues with the remaster visuals are mostly related to the way lighting has been implemented, faces on some of the baddies and the /generally/ bad water visuals. I can sort of give a pass to many of the choices however the lighting completely butchers the tone of many of the areas, often what is light should be dark and what is dark should be light. I don't think it's discussed enough but Tomb Raider has a solid horror streak through it at points which rely on the stark lighting to be effective. The Maria Doria levels are pretty bad for this but there's a few examples of a surprise bad dude being ruined by being illuminated.Lara does look great though and some areas also look really good, it's a total mixed bag.
>>738833142they're adequate for the time, but the gameplay has aged too badly.Also part 3 is too autistic with the stages and I like classic TR.
>>738835049>but the gameplay has aged too badly.i have no idea what this means
gooners rise up
>>738835049>they're adequate for the time, but the gameplay has aged too badly.
I still have a bunch of stuff to do in the new challenge mode they added to TRI-III but I put it aside due to all the bugs people were reporting including some outfits not unlocking, have they fixed all of that since?
are there any other examples of the main character outshining their own franchise as much as tomb raider?
>>738840050They've fixed shit
>>738830803I do.I replay 1 to 3 often.
do NOT jerk off to lara
>>738830803I replay a Core TR maybe every couple months.
>>738843026thats... surprisingdo you play custom levels?
>>738835049I disagree with the game play, it's nowhere near as clunky as people suggest once you've got your muscle memory in tune with the grid system and movement. TR3 does have some painful levels though, I do agree with that.>>738840357I've never seen that one before
>>738843058No, but I like playing the physical copies of the first 5. And I'll go back to Remastered and emulation for achievements and retro achievements.
>>738835049What the actual fuck happened to Lara?How did we go from this to that thing?This shit genuinely makes me sad.
