[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: gn.mp4 (2.02 MB, 560x560)
2.02 MB
2.02 MB MP4
"indie" is short for "independent"
examples of indie:
>Valve(self developed and self published)
>Rockstar Games(self developed and self published)
>Larian Studios(self developed and self published)
>Toby Fox(self developed and self published)
examples of poor:
>You
stop saying "indie" when you want to say "poor"
>>
independent means independent person if the game was made by more than 1 guy it's NOT indie
trvke
/thread
fpbp
>>
>>738860628
based
>>
File: 1537058166014.jpg (68 KB, 450x405)
68 KB JPG
>>738860504
Indie is a short for India
>>
>>738860504
Ahh yes GTA 5 my favorite indie game
>>
>>738860692
But that's not shorter?
>>
>>738860504
>Larian Studios(self developed and self published)
Tencent funded.
>>
>>738860692
and independent is long for india
>>
>>738860628
um, you cannot /thread your own post, newfag-kun...
>>
>>738860892
>he doesn't know
>>
>>738860892
that's the joke lad
>>
>>738860504
Rockstar is owned by take 2
>>
>>738860504
>Valve
Not a dev, publisher, not indie
>Rockstar
Take two
>Larian
Tencent
>Tranny
Ok
You are a fucking retard
>>
>>738861351
You don't know shit
>>
>>738860504
somehow people have taken indie to mean small studio that makes low budget games when we already have designations for budgets
A, AA and AAA are budget designations, indie doesn't fit into that at all

basically there's no agreed upon definition of indie
>>
>>738861520
>while they are a subsidiary
Indie means independent.
>>
>>738861617
>basically there's no agreed upon definition of indie
The word really is short for independent.
>>
>>738860504
Nintendo independently developed smb, Capcom developed ffi
fuck ""real"" indies
>>
>>738861351
>Valve
>Not a dev
except for Half-Life, Left 4 Dead, Alien Swarm, Team Fortress, Portal, Counter-Strike & Ricochet
>>
>>738861872
>Except for 20 year old games
So not a dev
>>
>>738860504
>Rockstar Games(self developed and self published)
Rockstar Games is owned by Take Two Interactive. Which part of "owned by another corporation" screams independent to you?
>>
>>738861789
yes but that's not how people use that term
>>
>>738861938
Deadlock isn't even out yet, that's a Valve game. In before "that game sucks you're a tranny waaah"
>>
>>738861938
>your dev license expires after X amount of time
based retard
also, they're literally developing Deadlock right now
>>
>>738862073
Terms still have established definitions.
>>
>>738862092
If internal dev teams count as the company then every publisher without a parent company is an indie by this retards metrics
Also Deadlock is not out yet, indeed
Also also it is good
Also also also you are still a tranny
>>
>>738860504
>look at popular "indie" games
>they're all published by an "indie" publisher
>said "indie" publishers are all multimillion/billion dollar companies with ties to even bigger companies
>also have huge marketing budgets and access to resources that most people couldn't even dream of
>massively popular and regarded as an "indie gem made by a small poor team" (of 40-100 people from one of the richest cities in the world with a budget of millions of dollars)
>look at actual indie games
>made by like 4 guys
>a budget of $30 and a case of beer
>no marketing beyond a YouTube video and a Twitter post
>ignored by everyone at best, people trying to actively ruin them at worst
Huh.
>>
>>738862325
Huh? Is your assertion that indies are literally just solo or a couple of developer outfits that publish and fund their own games without any corporate structure above them?
I don't even disagree with that, but that's not the argument you were making.

Also, I suspect you're actually the tranny. People love to project their own identity in my experience, there's no way for you to know me well enough to assert what my gender identity is.
>>
>>738860504
Rockstar games aren't self published Take 2 who also owns 2k is their publisher.
I bet you sure feel foolish for posting wrong information on the internet.
>>
>>738862703
Yes
We are in a fucking thread, if you didn't notice, thus we are talking about what the faggot op proposed
Also no, (You) are the tranny very clearly, you literally tope
>gender identity
Remember to dilate before it gets infected
>>
>>738860504
Anyone who only sells their game on a digital storefront is published by that storefront.
Publishing from the latin publicare: "To make public" and digital storefronts like Valve make these games public. The modern "Publisher" is really just a polite fiction to drape over a rightsholder and investor unless they actually publish something on infrastructure that they host themselves.
>>738861872
>Lists a bunch of examples where Valve approached the developers of an existing product and bought them out
>>
>>738862941
That's a tope? By the way, for me to be a tranny you literally have to accept and then assert gender identity being valid. If I'm a dude who pretends to be a woman and you do not accept gender identity, then I am simply a man not a tranny. Or vice versa for that matter.
I don't accept gender identity as a valid identity that you can have, it's just mental illness and sophistry. (which you apparently suffer from.)

I will never call you a tranny outside of asserting that you're projecting your own identity.
>>
>>738860504
"independent" is short for "independent developers" as in persons, it doesn't mean self developing and self publishing studios with hundreds of employees
>>
>>738863202
Half-Life is theirs tho, also not Valve's problem others sold out to them.
They still further developed their games(within Valve).
>>
>>738863675
>Gender identity
>>
>>738862073
The "way people use it" is a literal marketing grift coined to sell Fez. A random browser game or freeware is rarely called indie by someone looking up "free browser games" because it doesn't profit a grifter releasing the newest Fez(Trademark) that is then co-opted by companies, stuff follows.
>>
>>738861203
>>738861351
>>738862891
Rockstar Games' games are published by Rockstar Games, not by Take 2
>>
If you are contracted to make a game for a third party you immediately lose "indie" status and can only get it back by starting a new company
>>
>>738860504
>he thinks words to define genres are literal
Does a strategy genre imply games not in it have no strategy? Does the shooter genre imply games that aren't shooters have no shooting?

Indie just means a game was more of a passion project developed with a smaller team and little to no external oversight from publishers or investors.
>>
>>738861617
Indie means "not AAA company" which implies a higher level of independence in what they are doing.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.