>GAME: an in-depth analysis >video is literally just a 1:1 retelling of the things that happen in the game with 0 original thoughts or analysis
>Thread about video of GAME: an in-depth analysis>OP is literally just 1:1 retelling the things that happen in the video with 0 original thoughts or analysis
>Reply in thread about video of GAME: an in-depth analysis>Anon is literally just 1:1 retelling the things that happen in the OP with 0 original thoughts or analysis
>>738918349I remember putting on fuzzyslipper’s san andreas “retrospective” while installing storage alarms for work, only to realize 20 minutes in that the entire video is just him monotonously detailing every story mission without any critical input or analysis. some nasally voice faggot reading off a wiki page for 2 hours was pushed onto my homepage, and it had millions of views. dead site
>>738918349And somehow it's seven hours long.
>Why [thing that happened?], well let me first take you back...
>>738918349Nope. Streamers repeat themselves for 12 times in each video
One thing I noticed is that they will often say something like "but we'll talk about that more later", implying actual analysis, but then they never really do.
>>738918349>top 10 beginner tips for [GAME]>its just stuff that you can learn from the ingame tutorial
>>738919654
I wonder if there's a single person in this world that watches these video essays in their entirety instead of just falling asleep to them.
>>738918349make those niggers in depth review tetris:>square block is falling>now it's a straight line
>>738921550it’s content viewed by the same sort of people who need ridiculousness on in the background as they do the dishes
>>738921550I like to keep them as background noise while i do chores around the house or when im alone at work
>101 facts you didn't know about GAME!>#1: GAME was created in [year] by [studio]
