Was Bluepoint's Demon Souls really that bad?
Yes.
It was even worse than they say.
>>738923296Nah it was fine
>>738923296They added WWE animations for backstabs
>>738923591t. Shit Eater
>>738923296Nah, I played the original to death and didn’t notice many of the changes people sperg about. I actually like playing video games though.
>>738923296Someone please repost the old Allant vs nu Allant speech comparison
>>738923773you didn't, you don't
>>738923296Easily one of the most defining games of the generation in terms of polish, graphics and gameplay. A true must-play.
>>738924003...on reverse day
>>738923296no, it wasnt bad at all. it plays identical to the original with all mechanics and gameplay basically 1:1. there's some artistic choices you can critique, but they are not game breaking. you can zoom in on allants face and say look how bad it is or some shit, but hes zooming around the stage entire fight and you cant see any detail either way. having some gothic detail on facades for castle is hardly lore breaking and destroying the atmosphere. you are fucking retarded if you think it magically changed anything. oh no, the banners are blue, dont you know zanzibart hated blue? its on a rock you pick up if you let biblardo die in 2-1 but save his brother bobardo in 2-2. fucking game breaking change. you either didnt play the des remake or you are fucking retarded to parrot this garbage. what actually happened is people played des for the first time with remake and it was trash because all of these games are trash and they removed the mechanics from des because casuals couldnt deal with world tendencies and other bullshit. they played it and it was shit and it had to be because its a remake and not because its literally a 1:1 port with better graphics.also the ps3 version has never looked like your screenshot. ever. it was blurry, dark and muddy. you couldnt even see anything in the aids swamp and gargoyles flying were practically invisible. posting a fucking bullshot upscaled image for a game that looked like dogshit even by ps3 standards at the time shows how disingenuous this entire topic is.
>no, it wasnt bad at all. it plays identical to the original with all mechanics and gameplay basically 1:1. there's some artistic choices you can critique, but they are not game breaking. you can zoom in on allants face and say look how bad it is or some shit, but hes zooming around the stage entire fight and you cant see any detail either way. having some gothic detail on facades for castle is hardly lore breaking and destroying the atmosphere. you are fucking retarded if you think it magically changed anything. oh no, the banners are blue, dont you know zanzibart hated blue? its on a rock you pick up if you let biblardo die in 2-1 but save his brother bobardo in 2-2. fucking game breaking change. you either didnt play the des remake or you are fucking retarded to parrot this garbage.>what actually happened is people played des for the first time with remake and it was trash because all of these games are trash and they removed the mechanics from des because casuals couldnt deal with world tendencies and other bullshit. they played it and it was shit and it had to be because its a remake and not because its literally a 1:1 port with better graphics.>also the ps3 version has never looked like your screenshot. ever. it was blurry, dark and muddy. you couldnt even see anything in the aids swamp and gargoyles flying were practically invisible. posting a fucking bullshot upscaled image for a game that looked like dogshit even by ps3 standards at the time shows how disingenuous this entire topic is.
>>738923296gee I don't know...oh right they got shut down lmao
>>738924386I guess you haven't played it then. If you did then you would definitely agree.
