>buy multiplayer game based on how it plays and looks>year or 2 later the game is almost unrecognizable from launch due to ''updates''>no option to actually play the game you initially boughthow is this legal?
Because all multi-player "games" are not games, they're social platforms in the shape of a game. That's why they're simplistic, free to play, and include immediate integration with a variety of social apps from the get-go.
>>738926318uhmmm sweaty you should read the EULA it says ''Game experience may change during online play"
>Update casually changes the fundamental core of the game>Devs act surprised when literally everyone gets madThey don't think or care
>>738926318That happened with Command and Conquer 3. Campaign got hit with multiplayer balancing.
>>738926318Toxootransmosis moment
>>738927375don't be that guy..
>>738926318why would you think the game wouldnt' changeit's not a singleplayer game and they need to keep new players flowing in, they are not going to leave the game in a state of slow decline of the playercountit happens to every fucking modern multiplayer game or live service slop
>>738926318Name 5 times this happened, and you're wrong because games on steam can be downpatched pretty easily.
>>738927967>downpatch multiplayer game>cant play online because the server version is 1.3.0.4 and you're on 1.0.0.2retard
>>738926318They are licensed services, not games you bought.
