Nintendo games are cheap because they are low quality.
>Sean MalstromOpinion discarded.
>>738928668>if it cost more den it bettergame journalism, gentlemen and troons
>You won’t buy a $80/$70 Nintendo game cause that’s greedy and not worth the price>You won’t buy a $60/$50 Nintendo game cause the price means the game lacks contentAt this point what DO you want?
>>738928668F
>hourly NDS thread
>>738931921Nintendo games to be free.
>>738934795Tendie cope is so sad
>>738934795why is silksong on that pic?
Honestly just sounds like they're lowkey backing off on 70 or 80 dollar games, because they know it's not popular.This is saving face. They'll pretend these are "budget" for a while, until they just re-normalise this as the price of a video game (minus DLC). Maybe they'll toss out a big Mario or Zelda from time to time, and see if people are willing to pay out the ass for it. You can be sure these 100% were supposed to be full price games when development started.
