Why did this piss off pokefags so much?
>>738950940Who fucking cares, dude?
>>738950940There's a board for pokemonfor everyone who REALLY likes pokemontry posting this there and probably get banned for it.>too much water
>>738950940In retrospect, it deserved less
>daily NDS thread
>>738950940Anything lower than an 8 ensures a flop for a game, that's why you see all these 8-10s now
>>738950940>Too much water>Too many HMsHate too say it but he's not wrong. Pokemon was around 20 years (iirc) old already when those games came out. It's about time we stopped giving GF a free pass.
>>738950940This was purely an instance of people not reading the review. In the text the grievance was articulated well enough but the summary box did the whole thing a disservice and because most people reading IGN are children, they didnt read it and just skipped to the end.If you didn’t read the review then it looks really stupid just to look at that.I think the score is still too low but I understand the complaint even if I liked the water sections
>>738953376Gen 3 was always a weak generation, and people complained about too much water back on GBA. Plus, ORAS didn't even include the Emerald content. A 7 point something was suited. I even think when GameSpot got shit for giving Twilight Princess an 8.8, I think that was too generous. That PoS should have been a 7.5 for the dogshit pacing.
>>738950940the score is fair but his reasons are terrible especially since gen 4 has even more hms
