>/v/ starts parroting grifters and saying game is bad>Buy game>Is good>This happens every timeI dont think this was the intent but its serving as a good barometer for new purchases.
>more than 2 threads about the same game in the catalogue>using the same tag lines and imagei mean you really are not smart if you can spot such obvious marketing
supply and command
It's always something like this:If it's recent, popular and well-beloved, and /v/ says it's dogshit, it's great.If it's recent, niche and only known to journos, and /v/ says it's dogshit, it's dogshit.If it's old (>10 years), popular and well-beloved, and /v/ says it's dogshit, it's great.If it's old (>10 years), niche and well-beloved by those who like it, and /v/ says it's dogshit, it's really a coinflip.Bottom of the story: never trust /v/.
>>739001238Just check what big youtubers are playing dude. Like, if they say it's good, it must be true dude.
>>739001238Oh, so you loved Dustborn, Concord, Relooted, ValiDate and Mixtape?
Stealth marketing thread do not engage
>>739001542/v/ never talked about those games, /v/ talked about the controversy surrounding those games. /v/ hasn't played them, to put it simply.Take MH Wilds, Mouse P.I., BG3, Slay the Spire 2, etc. just examples out the top of my head. Games that /v/ shits on 24/7 but are actually good.Nothing new. Since I arrived 10 years ago /v/ has been consistently shitting on good games and praising absolute mid ones.
>>739002008LMAO get better bait
>>739002008>/v/ never talked about those gamesArchives exist.
