>WE NEED YOUR HELP STARFUCKS
>>739122217Elaborate, OP.
>>739122217Just because it doesn't look like your ideal form of furfaggotry doesn't mean there's no cohesive design to the art
>>739122217I prefer left
>>739122217Right looks like it was designed by a furry.
>>739122252Starfox wasn't fat in the original games. He's fat now. Also TAA, bloom, and anti-sovl gas.
>>739122217> every anthropomorphic animal should have the bland generic furry fanart look, the pixar look, or a mix between the two
>>739122217Because you can draw porn of the right but not the left. What a shame.
>>739122438>he's fat nowI thought furries at least knew how fur works
>>739122217which one am I supposed to hate?
>>739122442yes
All the official Nintendo redesigns are good.Unemployed furry "art designer" opinions are not important.>>739122438>"Fox is fat"You do know that fur is fur, right? It's not supposed to be or look like skin.
I like how we're deuglifying shit for the furfags now
Look how fat this fucking fatass fox is
>>739122217right stinks of furry so I prefer left.
hire fans
love the new cat look tho, she looks like a sex-starved has-been who fucks like a wild animal
Anyone have the edit of him grinning and wearing a McD's cap?
>>739122217They could've at least exaggerated the legs.
>>739122217left: a foxright: a furry
>>739122217fuck off furfag
>>739123812Foxes don't fly spaceships tho
>>739122217Left is better
>>739122682It's not a fucking poodle. Both have fur, the one on the left is simply fat. Cope. t. furries deserve the death penalty
>>739122217seethe harder, art illiterate-kun.
>>739122442Is this unironically why high achiever kids end up becoming tit fetishists and under achievers end up ass fetishists?
>>739125593> winners prefer the originalyes
>>739124257my bad, senpai.I didn't know furries did.
>>739125865The most baseline furry already has more flight experience from thrashing around in autistic fits of rage than even the most agile, quickest brown fox on earth.
>>739122572Why is that dog wearing a dog mask?
>>739122217Why are furfags so entitled to think that every animal/human hybrid MUST be sexually attractive to them in some way? How did society get to this point?
>>739122298what a strange argument, it doesn't look like the character anymore because it's basing it off of disgusting leftie furry artop never said anything about cohesive design, he said it's bad design that intentionally erodes its roots in kemono art and embraces weird fursuit culture
>>739122329it's actually the opposite. the left is literal western fursuit design, whereas the right looks like a japanese kemono mascot, which is what star fox was based on
>>739122792the western furries like the left you retardyou people are braindead
>>739123812left: a fursuitright: a kemono
>>739126251>Why are furfags so entitled to thinkIts not furfags, its a coomer mentality, in the last 15 it only got worse, check any discord, even site like 4chan, the amount of people that oversexualize everything is staggering.
>>739126251It's baffling how the only people celebrating the new art change are furries, and retards on the right that hate furries think it's owning themI'm disowning you from the right, you are just a useful idiot for leftist causes
I don't get this fixation on whether the redesigns are furry or not. They just look bad. You're not owning anyone by enjoying something shitty.
>>739122442Literally a queer fursuit fag argument, go replace your diaper
>>739122438he's not fat thoughbeit. stop winter fur shaming the poor guy.
sweeten the pot, pepper
>>739126856look at this fatasswhere is your neck fatty
>>739126856>stop winter fur shaming>>739122742>Look how fat this fucking fatass fox is>>739123090>love the new cat look tho, she looks like a sex-starved has-been who fucks like a wild animalIt's really enlightening to see rightwingers support ugly art redesigns that cater to blatant zoophiles.Great job guys.
>>739122217>Why is art design dead?calarts
>>739126828>>739127108What does this schizobabble even mean
>>739122217They went with the left design to appeal to the American audience.
>>739122792Look at the thread, you are catering to real life zoophiles with realistic designs.
>>739127282He knows, as do all of the other people defending the new designs.Because they are all zoophiles who are trying to deflect the shame they feel from fucking animals.It's why they always get defensive when you tell them to stop having sex with dogs.
>>739127245Zoophiles use the argument that cartoon animals should be FERAL and resemble animals, because that's what they get off to.You are defending people ITT, listed right there, that are actively sexualizing REAL ANIMALS, and you somehow think it's an own to support them.You are fucking retarded.
>>739122217I like the new hand design but I think it's a shame that the furries awakened by Krystal in the inevitable Adventure remake will have to settle for animal legs instead of thick thighs and nice feet.
>>739122298Fox literally looks like a fursuit
>>739127428Can some talented drawfag out there give us an idea of what krystal would look like using examples from the cat?
>>739122217QUICK! SOMEONE MAKE THE ANIMAL MORE FUCKABLE!
So if people dislike the designs they're horny furfags, and if they like them they're zoophiles?
>>739127764Anon, the zoophiles like the new designs, they are in this thread lmao
>>739127816It's the difference between liking human with animal traits and just liking animals.Star Fox is appealing hard to zoophiles and spiting the traditional audience.
>>739122438Retard.
last thing i want is it to be like that spyro remake with the weirdly barafag dragonsfurfags need to be sectioned off
>>739122442at least the one on the right actually looks like a young fox pilot, the one on the right is what i would draw if you asked me to make fox a washed up fat alcoholic.
>>739127970hm
>>739122217their eyes look awful, so unexpressive and dead lookingrealism was a mistake
>>739128024So you want the zoophiles to be catered to instead?Are you retarded?
>>739125593No, it's a classic quality vs quantity debate. Overachievers prefer tits, because they subconsciously care about nurturement of their offspring. Underachievers prefer ass, because they focus on just shitting out as many kids as possible while hoping some of them survive.
>>739122217>I want to FUCK my videogame mascots
>>739122442>every anthropomorphic animal should look like an uncanny realistic abomination because i'm a zoophile and humans with animal ears upset me
>>739128930>I want to FUCK my videogame animalshm
>>739122217left: kino, peak beast designright:cringe furry tranny coomerslop
>>739129087>left: kino, peak beast design i'd fuck>right:cringe furry tranny coomerslop i wouldn't fuckhm
>>739122217Why are people pretending that the right is isnt clearly a superior design? The new game does make him look fat, is that how you appeal to americans?
>>739122217Left is better.
>>739129409It's because they are zoophiles, unironically.They don't want their characters to be cartoon humans with animal features, they want to sexualize animals.
>>739129409Because that corporate boot is too delicious not to lick. If Nintendo approves it then it's correct, and if a fan criticizes it or alters it then the fan is bad and wrong.
>>739129568>Shorter snout>Larger head>Smaller limbsThey're not just zoophiles, they're pedo zoophiles.
>>739129739japanese people didn't like the new designs eitherthe only people defending the new designs think they are somehow owning furries and actual dogfuckers
>>739128221are these zoophiles in the room with us right now or just in your head
This whole "it's just zoophiles" shtick is nothing but honest to god cope. I have NOT seen people talking about how hot the new designs are. Furry faggots are just trying to deflect and impose their faggot fetishes on others
>>739122217>left: washed up old starfox at shitty local convention>right: starchad in his primeFurries study cartoons a lot so they know appeal. Left looks like he barely squeezes into his flight gear.
Why are you retards finally going to get that they're purposefully sabotaging this franchise and hoping it bombs because they want nothing to do with Star Fox anymore?
>>739129928>are these zoophiles in the room with us right now Yes actually, here >>739122742 >>739126856 >>739127086 >>739123090
>>739122217Fat chud fox
>>739130004It's completely lost on me that Fox is supposed to be an 18 or 19 year old military academy dropout in the new design. He looks like he's old, tired and jaded. And his voice line reads sound extremely tired and bored too.
>>739129967>uuuhhhh im not defending zoophilia guys! im totally owning you!!Day of the rope anon, day of the fucking rope.
>>739130012Feels like they're sabotaging everything at this point.
>you have to make your designs furry or you're pandering to people who want to fuck actual animalswoah a new brand of mental illnessthought i'd seen them all at this point
>>739129409Because we don’t want to fuck animals.
>>739122217AIJeets get the rope.
>>739122442This happened to me at school but she wasn't fat. She was a late 40 year old mom/teacher/whatever
>>739130012>purposefully sabotagingIf they did, they wouldn't put it in their new blockbuster film that's a vital part of Nintendo's business strategy. They just gave the new game to westoid developers thinking they'd deliver and, seeing we find out about the whole thing through a shadowdropped trailer a month before the release, someone must've realized they fucked up.
what the fuck are you guys arguing about
>>739130060Nigger 3/4s of those are people who just like cute animals. Not every animal lover wants to actually fuck them. Also, the last one about Katt is more of a commentary on her new "druggie" look and not on how realistic she looks. Fuck off.
>>739130214If you intentionally prop up animal designs over cartoon humans with animal ears, you are a sus individual.
>739130163>if you don't buy into my concern trolling you're a zoophile reeeeeNot even worth a (you)
>>739130012Doesn't make any sense because developing a game costs a lotthere are cheaper ways of sabotaging a franchise
>>739130012Star Fox is an experiment franchise. It has nothing to do with fans or anything like that. There hasn't been one Star Fox game since 64 thst wasn't made trying out some new gimmick. If they listened to fans, they would have done more of 64 with a new plot/more routes/more planets.
>>739130319Go check the hash on those images, that's a dogfucker.You are supporting dogfuckers and think it's owning "furries"What the fuck is wrong with you
>>739127816Furfag is a buzzword, you just throw it at anybody you disagree with (or pretend to for replies)
>>739130387You are being called out as the degenerate dogfucker you are.Shoe fits dogfucker.
>>739130318one sperg keeps making these threads and samefagging a lot in hopes of convincing someone that there are people that like the new designs
>>739122217Left looks better. Right looks like an autistic return to the Dinosaur Planet - Command era dogshit slop.
>>739130139>supposed to be an 18 or 19 year old military academy dropoutno no I can believe it. He looks like he dropped out to become a plumber
>rightwing retards getting mixed up in the middle of the feral vs furry discourse
>>739130446if someone came in and started cumming at the shape of the rocket ships i'd view it as an unavoidable consequence of severe mental illness, basically the same way i view this zoophile 'pandering' you're on about.
>>739122217>left designed by Nintendo>right designed by a furry faggotMiyamoto and Nintendo would have been criticized as woke furry fags if they went the design on the right. I am completely serious.
>>739122217Stop trying to fuck Fox.
>>739130756>Miyamoto and Nintendo would have been criticized as woke furry fags if they went the design on the right.Only by retards on this board who don't matter anyway. Pretty sure most people would prefer fox not looking like a washed up has-been pushing 50.
Imagine getting so mindraped by a bunch of fringe fetishists that you hate the idea of things being visually appealing just because they might like it."If they look good then FURRIES will like it!"Yeah? Is it because they want cohesive and appealing characters as well, just for different reasons?
>>739130446>you don't think of fucking animals when you see them?>what the fuck is wrong with you????!!
>>739122442they don't even look anthromorphic anymore
>>739129919it's the exact opposite you fucking retard. furries hate the new designs because they are too realistic and thus remind them of their degeneracy. they need cartoony sexy coomer fortnite animals to jerk off to.
>muh box art"What the hell, why isn't the main character an old man with a beard!?"
>>739122217Are furries still having a meltdown, because Fox isn't fuckable enough? kek
>>739130715That's zoophilia apologism >oh well, I didn't know I was supporting animal fucking, I was just supporting realistic animal depictions in media frequently sexualized by the communitySure bud
>>739130556why bother engaging with said retard
>>739131114People can be correct for the wrong reasons.
>>739131114You're not a furry, what the fuck do you know?
>>739130756>Miyamoto and Nintendo would have been criticized as woke furry fags if they went the design on the right. I am completely serious.I ABSOLUTELY GURANTEE you that if the right was the default people say that Fox looks like a masculine chad instead of a furry twink
>>739122217Imagine if they gave Leon a double chin in Requiem.
>>739131114furries don't like realistic animals in their media because we don't want to be associated with literal zoophiles, which is what you people are supporting
>>739130954furfags don't want cohesive designs lmao, they want it to be fuckable. they'll attach any human design traits they find attractive onto any animal if it makes their dick hard.what it looks like to non-furfags is extensive self-gratification to the detriment of cohesion. but i understand that the frog in the well doesn't know the ocean.
>>739122217It's obvious the intent is to emulate the look of the puppets from the original cover.Left is soul, right is just gooner shit for furries.
>>739126395>>739127430wtf show me a fursuit that looks more like new Fox than the old oneif something his old model looked cartoony as fuck like those heads
>>739131114furfags are the ones defending the new designs the most tho
>>739131305>>739122217>>739131332im a furry and I think the right looks hot. I like realistic anthros. im not a zoophile. I just think both cartoony and realistic furries can both exist and both look good if done right.not sure where this narrative comes from where furries only like cartoony stuff?
>furries say bad>so i say good
>>739131168do you view any child appearing in a video game as pedophile pandering? any women dying a gruesome death as guro pandering?just curious what the limits are to pandering, when does it go from intentional to non-intentional, and where do you gleam the insight to understand it so accurately that us unenlightened masses can't grasp?
>>739122217>All the arguing ITT that if you want appealing character design then you're a gay furfagI just don't think left looks very good
>/v/ retardation has gotten so bad that now people are openly supporting 5 to "own the furries"LMAO
actually as a furfag ive wanted realistic looking starfox designs for a long time. Im more disappointed in the execution.>>739122217 and >>739131467 is how they should have looked. Falco looks plain wrong and Fox looks too fat and corgi-like
>>739131401i rather play as the puppets than what they gave us
>>739131467>not sure where this narrative comes from where furries only like cartoony stuff?Because 99% of them are like that because they watched cartoons, not because they looked at their cat and thought they wanna be like them.
>>739131687Again, where are you getting this information from? You are just making this up in your head. Skyrim has realistic anthros and furries absolutely love khajit and argonians. You are just flaming something that doesnt exist and making drama where it doesnt exist.The only backlash is just because the designs are bad and the graphics look really dated. Nobody actually cares they aren't cartoony anymore.
>>739131513>zoophiles say good>so i say goodhm
>>739131827>Nobody actually cares about artistic integritylol
>>739129919>japanese people didn't like the new designs eitherCool lie bro
>/v/ discussing the new star fox reveal
>hurr durr why doesn't star fox look like thishttps://static1.e621.net/data/db/ae/dbaee14e0f05cbd0e8e699dc7f92cf60.webmWhy are furfags like this
why is it bad to make them attractive when they are anthros?
>>739122217What's supposed to be better about the right one?
>>739122572his chin is so fat you can see the outline through the fur CAN'T LET YOU EAT THAT STAR FAT
>>739131887Huh? Its a fucking nintendo game. Artistic integrity? Take your meds.And what does artistic integrity have to do with you making all this fake narrative furry community shit up in your head?have you even been to a furry convention? Why dont you actually go and ask furries what they think about the new designs instead of listening to retards on twitter and 4chan
>>739131401>"it's meant to look like the puppets">t. someone looking at designs that don't look like the puppets at all
>>739129409Thank you anon. Americans think the one on the right isn't fat kek.
>>739126251people just want him to look cool and not lame, i think
>>739122217I dont mind his general look I just dont like what they did to their feet/boots.
>>739131548I am completely within my rights to criticize media that has an openly sexual fanbase from being changed.Especially when the changes have to do with depicting the characters as less human and more animal.Feral zoophilia is a growing trend on e621 and rule34 and any one that says otherwise is just ignorant, or actively supports it.
>>739128990>>739128221> zoophilesthat's basically just white women, but neither are there any in this thread, nor will they play this game or partake in this discourse elsewhere
>>739130012Universal and Illumination are making a Star Fox movie that comes out in 2028. If Nintendo really hates the IP that bad they should just sell it to them.
>>739131953Anthros? They aren't anthros anon!They are realistic animals now!
>not using the same design as what everyone agrees is a 10/10 lookThis is like when The Dark Knight came out, and in the same month a comic released where Batman died, or how the Spider-Man movies coincided with Brand New Day.
>>739126856why God had to make these creatures smell like a FUCKING SHITHOUSE?
>>739130012They always hated Star Fox because the only reason the first game was possible was because of a half-dozen Bong teens.
>>739129409I wish they adopted the Melee look. I think that's the only time I thought Fox looked cool.
>>739131829>>739129363>>739129063Zoophile
>>739132370> pixarslop lookno thanks
>>739131918so you want this fanbase of degenerates to make this kind of art with realistic animals now? is that really your position?
>>739132272>Feral zoophilia is a growing trend on e621 and rule34 and any one that says otherwise is just ignorant, or actively supports it.Why are you looking at that stuff? It sounds like you are crazy projecting dogfucker right now and just overcompensating in an argument
>It's good because furries hate it!Oh?>Actually furries love it.Oh.
>>739132408balance
>>739132518Sorry to disappoint you but StarFox isn't Wing Commander.
>>739122217I know nothing about Star Fox, but right version looks kind of cool and interesting to look at. Mogs the thing that's on the left.
>>739132563See, you are just a zoophile arguing in bad faith, I don't support you people in furry spaces.
Come home white man
>>739132585Star Fox 64 was MY wing commander, you can't take that away from me.
>>739130273Star Fox 1, 2 and Adventures were all made by British studios. I think the major problem is that 1) the Western gaming culture has changed dramatically for the worse in the last 20 years (thanks Zoe Quinn), and 2) Nintendo either just handed it off and didn't give a rat's ass, or they had a corporate mandate to make Fox look like Rocket Raccoon from Guardians of the Galaxy. It's very hard to know if it was the developer's fault or Nintendo's but ultimately Nintendo signed off on every one of these redesigns and it was probably their idea to remake Star Fox 64 in the first place.If they wanted a game to test the waters with they should have made a Star Fox game with retrowave style visuals like Ex Zodiac. That's what Fox's intro scene in the Mario Galaxy looked like anyway so it would be a very easy way for the movie audience to get into the series.
>wing commander out of nowhereThis retard again
Left looks like an edit someone made of the right as a joke,
>>739132272personally i don't view video game creators as caretakers to the most degenerate mentally ill of their fans but maybe that's regressive as meam i meant to think miyamoto should consider whatever the fuck you're talking about? look at yourself
>>739131967Right is easier to draw/animate for gay pornYou know, what Star Fox has been known for years
>>739132631im not the one that goes to e621 and notices "things are trending towards zoophilia". You're a fucking psycho and I bet you shamefully jack off to dogs assholes and pussies lmao. Because if you actually didn't want to see that stuff you would take 10 seconds to make a fucking blacklist you retarded fag.
>>739132696Miyamoto specifically cultivated a sexualized fanbase of furries for Star Fox.It's ignorant to state otherwise.There were very obvious and blatant design decisions by Miyamoto to cultivate a sexual fanbase.Changing to a realistic animal artstyle with such a fanbase is just courting zoophiles to get mixed into the Star Fox fanbase.
>>739123774Needs robot legs
>>739132768>You're a fucking psychoNo, I just act in good faith, whereas you act in a degenerate way.
>>739132578worse, it's zoophiles that like it
>>739132970you jack off to e621 you have nothing to stand on. You're even more degenerate than me because I dont look at ferals like you do
>>739131967It's not feral bait
>>739122217They wouldn't even give Fox sexy human-life feet. Furry fags are truly in shambles.
>>739131918Fox deserves rape
>>739133068>gatekeeping zoophilia out of Star Fox is bad because you can just blacklist tagsYou are such a disingenuous gross person
>>739132370>>739132585>>739132658There's no reason why Fox has to have a realistic taxidermy look to draw inspiration from Wing Commander. In fact, Wing Commander's format would work brilliantly for Star Fox-- missions consist of all range mode battles that are connected by "auto pilot" sections, except instead of auto pilot simply being fast travel between objectives, that's where you can have an on-rails section where you shoot down enemy drones and evade long range weapons, before reaching the next objective where it switches back to all-range mode. That would be a great way to make missions feel bigger and more substantial. The Wing Commander games were very content rich and you couldn't beat them in a single sitting and that's something Star Fox has struggled with for a long time. Combine that with central explorable hubs between missions ala Mass Effect (another game that drew inspiration from Wing Commander) and maybe some ground assault and on-foot action like Assault and you have yourself a AAA Star Fox game that will actually resonate in the modern market and give people a lot more bang for their buck than a simple arcade shmup.
>>739132874if that's your basis i can see where your mental illness arises fromi appreciate you taking the time to explain
>>739133179Nah, thats you. Literally nobody thinks the new designs have anything to do with zoophiles except you, because you are a self-hating, autistic, overcompensating dogfucker with a twisted enough world-view where you actually interpret the new designs as Zoo or even Zoo adjacent, which it isnt. You even admitted to looking at Zoo artwork and not using a blacklist. evaluate your life.
This fucking dude looks like he gets out of breath while talking.
>>739133031it's not t. zoophile
>>739133448>stating thing exists>YOU CONSUME THINGLol
>>739133458
>>739133674>>739133458Fox McChud>Krystal owes me sex.
it's incredibly unappealingit's not sexyit's not coolit invokes nothingif you want to avoid the sexy route at least make them look cool instead of looking like stuffed animals
>>739133347I more more meant "it's not Wing Commander" in the sense that it's not a space opera war drama. It's a Saturday morning cartoon. It's not "serious".(Yes, I know there was a WC cartoon).
>>739122682>>739126856>>739127086>>739129409jej he really does look fat in the Switch 2 version. Also has almost zero fur from that side angle. Americans really cope with fat by calling someone a furry.
>>739133842>"Hey guys, welcome to the *heavy breath* stream. So, it finally happened. My *shoves chips into his mouth and crunches into the mic* girl left me. Fucking *cough COUGH* women are all the same."
>>739133347Why can't they just use the original / SF64's design? The new design just looks wrong. Fuck furries btw.
>>739122298>>739122442>>739122486>the older Star Fox games' art design was always bad anywayANOTHER ONE FOR THE LIST
>>739122298the most brvtal trvke ever
>>739133564except you arent hating thing that exists. You are ousting yourself. How do you know theres more feral content on e621 than before (Which isn't true btw, I look at feral content and its been the same since 2009). Secondly, Zoophiles dont care about anthros or even cartoony ferals. Zoophiles just straight up fap to RL pictures and vids, they dont care or have nothing to do with nintendo characters. You're making this false narrative that doesn't make sense and isnt based on any fact. Like I said, people are just upset about the designs because they look silly. Not because of how much fur is being rendered on their face. You're fucking retarded.
I think we should make everything look a pile of shit just in case somebody might like itScatfags will feast but you have to make sacrifices.
>>739134093And what exactly is the cohesive design of Switch 2's Star Fox designs?
>>739122217I would fuck both foxes.
>>739134273>STRETCH-MARKS JUST MEAN ONE THANG, YOU WAS SMALL AND GOT BIG, OR WAS BIG AND GOT SMALL. EITHER WAY, WE FUCKIN
>>739134071I keep running into people who defend the game and are like "nobody is saying the original designs were bad" 5 seconds after I see someone say "I'm glad they don't look like furry cereal mascots anymore."
>>739122217>>739122572>>739122682>>739126856>>739127086>>739129087>>739129568>>739133153Fatfags in shambles
>>739134249
>>739134213>Zoophiles just straight up fap to RL pictures and vids, they dont care or have nothing to do with nintendo characters>You're making this false narrative that doesn't make sense and isnt based on any fact. Pokephilia isn't popular?Rule34video doesn't constantly have zoophilia on the front page?You are lying.
>>739134419>Fox doesn't even try and argue with you any more he just looks at you like this
>>739134373That's not even funny lol
>>739134492I dont go on rule34video or whatever the fuck that is. im just an old-school furfag. >pokephilliaPokephillia is not ZoophiliaMLP isn't zoophiliasparkledog feral OCs are not ZoophiliaI think you are getting your words confused. Zoophilia literally means people who want to fuck real life animals, or at least fetishize them to a point where the art is of an actual animal.
>>739134740>pokephilia is not zoophiliaIt absolutely is and anyone saying otherwise is a zoophile in HARD denial. Why is it so hard to accept that animals can be hot?
>>739132276>but neither are there any in this thread
>>739134740Feral and zoophilia is on the sus spectrum, which should not be engaged with.
>>739134880Someone who faps to pikachu is not automatically going to raise a dog and fuck it for its whole life. You're naive. Zoophiles are criminals and animal abusers. Waving around accusations that people who like the semi-realistic new starfox designs are literal dogfuckers is just trying wayyyy too hard to either be a troll, or someone with very little nuance or their intelligence on their view on life or fetishes Also the arguement that furries think the new designs are bad or not hot because THEY think the new designs are Zoo-adjacent is a retarded as fuck take. Literally zero furries are complaining about that part, its the fact that it was done so poorly.
>>739134880It's not hard to accept. I don't get boner from seeing animals.
>>739122217Left Fox: DILF daddy who you'd get crushed by in bed, equipped with fat stinky chode DILF dick and looooooow hanging gargantuan fuzzy nuts. Likes strawberry shakes and belly rubs.Right Fox: Young virgin punk who thinks the key to getting sex is staying in shape but has never been laid despite literally being stranded on an isolated planet for years with a smoking how amazoness whore. Equipped with tiny cock and balls, though nobody will ever see them because he exclusively bottoms for guys like left Fox. Likes protein shakes and hot showers.You could probably get sandwiched between the two if you play your cards right, but only if fat fox tops and punk fox bottoms.
>>739134880>Why is it so hard to accept that animals can be hot?kek, what a statement to write
>>739135594i mean youre just describing fox and his dad. thats why wolf deep dicks him with his own dad cock. he's the replacementwhy is furry anything gay. its always gay by default. if you see a furry boy, its gay porn. if you see a furry girl, its a boy and its gay porn
>>739134740It's xenophobia regardless.
>>739135772Furries and gays are social outcasts, it's no surprise that they naturally mesh. Also I'm straight and I would smash the fuck out of both of OP's foxes without question or hesitation.
>>739135869>It's xenophilia regardless.Fixed (fucking auto correct)
>>739122217>leftSOVL>rightsoulles goyney slop for millenials
>>739135772i know all sorts of autism (trannies, furries, etc) overlap with eachother hard but perhaps the group that overlaps the MOST with the other are furries and faggots to the point where finding a faggot who is NOT a furfag feels like finding a unicorn
>>739135941>goyneywhat even is this supposed to mean
>>739135941soul is when whatever nintendo does officially no questions asked
>>739135878>Furries and gays are social outcasts, it's no surprise that they naturally meshActually, Furries at the start used to be mostly heterosexual. Then the guys who organised the furcons (a fag "couple") fished around for more attendees at gay and fetish clubs, and the rest is history.
>>739134880It's not, zoophiles don't give a shit about cartoon animals when the real ones are right there. Furries like cartoon animals.
>>739122442problem?
The issue of the arguments like "it's meant to look like the puppets" and "it's not supposed to be sexy, furfag!" don't tackle the central point: that the designs look shit.
>>739136203but furry porn for example, is gay by default. its like how "shotacon" is default gay so you need to say straight shota if you want a shota with a woman, and even then he's probably getting pegged.its like you dont have to think about it. see a furry in anything, you know its gay
>>739136367because they like stylestyle is what brings sentiments like "oh that's cool" or "oh that's sexy"these styles evoke nothing more than "it looks like they painted over rocket racoon"
>>739136367It's just easier to attack some furfag/antifurfag strawman than it is to defend these dogshit redesigns.
>>739136272>it's not real zoophilia when it's drawnI guess jacking off to straight hentai doesn't actually make you straight then? Incredible logic.
>>739136367>>739136475>because they like* stylei meant to say they LACK styleit's like someone picked up the models from some artstation portfolio and filled with accessories. It's not just that it doesn't look like Starfox, it looks like a generic anthro fox model that was given Star Fox's clothes and visor, like an impostor if you will
>>739136548>jacking off to straight hentai doesn't actually make you straight thendepends i guess. hentai is unrealistic so its probably possible to jerk off to straight hentai without the woman bothering you too much because she doesnt look like a real woman. i mean well youre straight so are you jerking off to the cartoon man too? and you watch men fucking women irl too. the answer is no but you do it.actually, i'd say its much easier to jerk off to whatever the opposite of your orientation is as long as its cartoons, easier than it is for you to jerk off to straight porn and hentai
>>739136548Where in real life does a creature like in your pic live?
>>739136789my anus, attached via strap on
>>739136763>it's not real zoophilia if it's drawn and even if it was who cares because guys have to have sex with women so jacking off to guys isn't gayYou are 100% a gay zoophile. I can't tell if this is desperate cope or genuine retardation.
>if you enjoy rape hentai/roleplay then you want to rape in real life
>>739136935im not whoever you were arguing with. you asked a question and i answered. i thought about it, and logically i have to say yes, because your reality is far gayer yet you still do it so it MUST be possible for a faggot to jerk off to straight cartoon porn
>>739137026>just because I religiously researched and documented school shootings doesn't mean I wanted to shoot up a school! - every school shooter ever
>>739137026how many times a crime happens and then we see the signs were there all along?nigger I love furry art, I would jump in front of a moving truck without ever touching one of my pets inappropiately but I'm not going to pretend "it's fiction lol", "it's a drawing, lol"you do not fathom how crazy people can be and how thin the lines are for autists
>>739126454But you're saying both look like they were designed by furries then.
>>739137346>I would jump in front of a moving truck without* ever touching one of my pets inappropiatelyfuck I meant to say before touching
>>739137026Well at least raping women is something physically possible in real life unlike finding an animal that looks like this >>739136548 , actually human female is the closest you can find.
>>739126532I don't know anon, I'm surrounded by furries and live on furry twitter and I've only seen like one person say they like it. The consensus is generally "hire actual furries to make shit like this so it will actually look good," sports teams need to do the same thing with their mascot suits
>>739137026I only like a cretain type of rape
>>739136421>but furry porn for example, is gay by default.More straight/female entries on e6 than male/gay
>>739137505What do you mean? Rape is rape.
>a franchise so neglected, it has become more famous for its porn than recent games>finally get a cameo in a popular movie to try to drum up interest in your series>throw all that away with a redesign that doesn't look close to what people know him for recentlySeriously what is Nintendo thinking? It isnt like there isnt that many remaining fans left that aren't furries, so pandering to them is all you have left. Becuase people aren't playing star fox games for the 2 hour long linear gameplay anymore. Whether these fags desperately defending these designs want to admit it or not, sex sells! Nobody wants ugly character designs. So yes, right is better.>inb4 zoophile
>>739137457Pretty much.If you have leaky pipes you call a plumber, you know?
>>739122298You can call it whatever you like. It still looks like shit.
>>739137731Yeah, I bet you love watching fat sweaty plumbers handle big stiff pipes all day don't you?
>>739137660you're really really overestimating the amount of furfags there are out thereyou're in too deep, you can't see out.
>>739137660>>finally get a cameo in a popular movie to try to drum up interest in your series>>throw all that away with a redesign that doesn't look close to what people know him for recentlyYeah, especially when SMG made him cool, and now he looks like a Reddit moderator.
>>739122217>No see it's better because Fox looks fat! Have you ever seen a real fox before? The ridiculous feet make him look better!
>>739137835kek, the fanbase IS furfagsthey might not be many, but they are like 99% of the people that give a fuck
>>739131114Gay furfags will jerk off to fox to matter how ugly they make him
>>739137835>overestimating the amount of furfagsYou have no idea how many of us exist. There is a reason why the tech sector is controlled by furfags.
>>739122217I really, really, really like this fan redesign.
>>739122742But why do you want to fuck it? And why do you want it in video games?
You're all virgins for fapping to cartoon porn in unrealistic situations. Go buy a hooker to fuck damn it!
>>739122298Some people that are obsessed with having sex with animals or alternatively obsessed with people who are obsessed with having sex with animals might not like hearing it, but the design on the right just generally fits the character better. Forget about whether or not he looks fat, I just don't think that Star Fox would look that unkempt. There's a lot of shots where the design looks more like a fat neckbeard than a hotshot ace pilot.
>>739138169>why do you want to fuck it?because it's cute
Basing your opinion on things on who gets mad at them is incredibly dysfunctional and unhealthy.
>>739138227>he doesn't know how much sex furries have lol
>>739136367>>739136592It looks like a generic fox from a Geico commercial. I can just imagine it, they show a driver swerve out of the way to avoid hitting a fox and hits a tree, then the fox walks up to the window and asks the guy if he has geico and then tells him that Geico will cover the damage. All they did was take that hypothetical fox and put him in a Fox McCloud costume.That's what makes me feel like these designs are the product of an out of touch marketing firm and not people who actually love Star Fox.
just show me the carfax
>>739122298This>>739122442Also thi->picHoly motherfucking /thread
>>739122217I like left.There, I said it.
>>739133153I am convinced that this is just an attempt by "le autheur" type of game devs to make something unique for the sake of it. 'Furries have never been done this way!' and here we are. Would also explain why we redo 64 again because they clearly have no interest in making any fresh gameplay.
>>739140163I like both. Big boys need love too.
>>739139586Don't rape the artic fox puppy. Maniac
>they need to look realistic, not good lookingWhere have we heard this before?
>>739142102every AAA game released in the last decade
>>739142194yes anon that was the joke
>>739122217The one on the left looks like the one on the right, just fatter
>>739122217>Left looks like a fox>Right looks like a fox fursonaYeah I know which is better, no need to remind me.
Right looks better.
>>739122442It's a fox head on a bipedal body. It's not anthropomorphized.
>>739122298The left looks like a fatass in a furry suit. Its even more furfaggotry than the right is.
>>739132370You mean One More Day? Because if that's true that's a funny ass fucking fumble, honestly fuck western comicseven 20 fucking years ago they were going with the>yes please kill my unborn child and take my wife so I get to spend 24 more hours with my old hag aunt who'd slap me so fucking hard for making this choiceWHAT, and I mean this, WERE THEY THINKING?
bipedal animals > furries
If they back down, PLEASE leave Katt alone.I want a skank fox so badly
>>739122217>fat>no chinWhy the fuck did they turn Fox in to a redditor?
>>739122217Retard.>>739147402No, it's not.
>>739147510This would objectively be the best design choice. Just make them look like real animals, it's way better because real animals look cool
>>739122217>left lacks some of the more conventionally attractive attributes of the right (raised snout creating the illusion of high cheekbones, more arched browline, eyes closer together, chin and jaw more defined) >"art design" is LE DEAD for lacking it on the left just say you're mad he's not fuckable enough like all the other furry retards pitching a shitfit over this retarded shit
RIS OCH KORVJag förstår inte men jag slår med träsleven
>>739122217>all women should be designed by gooner men>all men should be designed by gooner women>all anthro should be designed by furriesalright, we're getting somewhere in these negotiations
>>739122217Because Nintendo got woke and hired troons and Jews
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH
>>739126069To hide his shame.
SF64 won't be toppedhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1fwGAtnSbA
>>739122217Unc….
>>739130263Forgot to mention she farted on me
>What yu mean, yu no think an unreal engine graphics upgrade, new cutscenes and weird new character designs are worth $50 and a new console? Why yu so entitled, yu think we can just make a new Star Fox game and not make characters look fukki wukki? That cost mirrion of dorrar. Also Sweet Baby Inc will disciprin me if I don't hit Katt Moroe with ugry stikku.
Fox if he nekkid
>>739122217 Why dis nigga so fat?
>>739156024>Oh, hello. I'm Switch 2 Star Fox, and I'm the guy who's NOT judging you on your appearance.
>>739156024It's 2021, pilots can be any size now.
>>739155634>no dick and ballsAwful redesign.
