>He actually replays gamesIf you replay games, there's something wrong with you. I just play games once and then move on to the next one. the reason why I never played Persona 5 Royal is because you're forced to replay the same first palaces from the original again to get to the new things. why would anyone who isn't autistic do this? I also haven't played FFVII, but I know what happens to Aeris. that's why I will never ever play it. I wish there was some medicine that would make me forget spoilers so I could play the games I can never play now
whore
i played new vegas beginning to end 11 times on ps3 without any dlc
>>739221650My legs! They're....moving on their own!!!
>she plays games
>>739221317>If you replay games, there's something wrong with you. I just play games once and then move on to the next one.OP is fucking based for once. People that complain about low replayability are trannies and/or retarded. Beat the game, and move one with your fucking life.
>he plays "games" as interactive experiences>he doesn't engage with games as a contest to be won, and be beaten better in the futureFake gamer alert
>>739222603Only trannies and autists replay games. if I get one detail spoiled, I will never play it. I do this because I'm normal and not a non-functioning dysgenic freak.
/v/ is full of retarded failed normie casuals. You're just here because you have no other interests. Kill yourself
>>739221317>>739222603So do you sell your games when you're finished?Can't sell a digital game so there's no reason why you shouldn't replay it.
>>739221317But pikmin tells you to play it again. Are you not going to listen to that. I do not want to be a scorelet either.
>>739223406Dude. who cares? I already played it once and I move on to the next unspoiled product to consume.
>>739221317i replay games because most of the other ones are ass
>>739223485I want numbers that are either big or tiny. Also you can find new shit sometimes and that always feels nice.
I replay the original dead space like once a year >>739223546also this new games are shit so theres nothing to play but old games
I play to about midway through a game, restart and play through the beginning a few times, and then drop it.Actually finishing a game is very rare even if I enjoy the game.Unless the game is actually short enough to finish I just like playing the part I like.
>>739222941A pure mind is worth 1000 souls
>>739224402But how do you know there aren't parts you would also like later in the game?You got adhd or autism, bro?
>>739221317some of the best games ever made are highly replayable
Longevity is an important aspect of a good game, if the game has no replayability then it's not a worthwile experience in my eyes
>>739224556There could be and maybe I'll get to them someday when I pick the game back up years later, but there is no point forcing through to see some credits.Games are just toys after all, and I have other toys to play with.
>>739221317Is there something wrong with you if you relisten to music?
>>739221317I don't think replaying games is a necessity for a game to be good, but to swing so far in the opposite direction that you are unable to grasp the appeal of replaying a game? I wonder if people this far gone even like what they do, or if they're just consuming content to be consumed. I've replayed a game like, I dunno, Megaman X fuck knows how many times in the last 25 years. That game is also designed to just be picked up and cleared when the fuck ever the mood suits you, it's replayable as all hell. Takes less than 2 hours out of your day. I can't imagine playing that game once and then going "that was cool, but never again". That would strike me as very weird.
>>739221317same. i wonder if it was reinforced by the fact i played most games through blockbuster. id binge it for a week and then move on.except for PC games which I never sold
>I don't replay games>brings up jrpgswell there's your problem. jrpgs are movie games with shit gameplay. once you've watched the movie and know what happens theres not much reason to watch it again is there? try playing games that are actually fun and offer lots of options.
>>739225019>jrpgs are movie games with shit gameplayThey hated him for telling the truth.
Nah I'm fine with my autism
>>739225139>currently in-gameholy fucking based
>>739221317>imageWe made the story ambiguous so you can interpret it any way you want....just uh make sure your interpretation is the same as the most popular interpretation. Or else.....
I replay platformers fairly often. I've also replayed RE4 several times.
>>739225019trvke trvke tvrkeEven some VNs have better replay value than jrpgs because they have better stories and writing that allow you to enjoy foreshadowing more. Shmups, roguelikes, action and arcade games often have good core gameplay allowing for more replayability. Singleplayer turn-based strategy games often have a fun puzzle component that asks creativity from the player to replay effectively, et. Multiplayer strategy games are easily replayable for obvious reasons. Meanwhile, turn-based story focused jrpgs and games that follow their design philosophy legitimately have nothing to offer past a 1st playthrough. They're often poorly designed, the optimal way to play is always the most boring and uncreative strategy, story and writing potential are severely limited because they have to be designed around the game and vice-versa which makes player expression difficult if not impossible.
>>739225315>replaying something where you already know how exactly to jumplmfao sperg
>>739222603>People that complain about low replayability are trannies and/or retarded.I think OP is a fag but I gotta agree on this point.I like replaying games but complaining that a game isn't replayable is dumb. They are designed for one play through 90% of the time and those demanding more tend to be really detached with the average player experience and have too much time on their hands.
>>739224592>he says while posting RE, which has no replayability at all
>>739224616Why?
Why? They're not movies, you can play a game twice and go through two different experiences.Seems like such an autistic self-restriction.
>>739222941>if I get one detail spoiled, I will never play itBy your own logic you should be replaying games, because this is severely fucking autistic.
>>739221317I've replayed ff6 in german after having played it in english (I'm an ESL but not german). I learned the basics of german that way
>>739221317>I'm massive retard who can't comprehend there are people with different tastes and customs than me and there's something wrong with them because they're not carbon copy of me!great start>I can't enjoy the videogames because muh spoilers!sounds autistic, kettle calling pot black huh? but pot is green dumbo
>>739225797incorrect
>>739221317>>739222603based
>>739225725Pretty much this, replaying a game is fine but calling a game shit because it has low replayability also makes you a fag.
>>739225891>go through two different experiencesYou can't though. It's the exact same shit every single time. Maybe you get a different ending, wow.
>>739227693Not if you play something like Star Fox 64.
>>739226351>I can't enjoy the videogame because muh spoilersUnironically, yes. Great mystery games are no longer worth playing if you know the solution beforehand.
>>739227693you never heard of branching paths? nigger how old are you?
Have you ever done anything more than once? Why?
>>739230365No? Why should I? what's the point of watching a great mystery movie like The Usual Suspects if I already know how it ends? why should I play games like Outer Wilds if I already know the solution to the puzzle?
>>739230403What's the point in eating something I've already tried before if I already know what it tastes like? Why should I listen to a song again if I already know the lyrics? Why should I ever do anything more than exactly one time?
>>739230471I would literally murder someone just so I can listen to a song, watch a movie or play a game for my first time again. or better yet, take a magic pill that makes me forget all the spoilers from older games I never had a chance to play and the fact that you can't understand something simple as this means that there's something wrong with you.
>>739230403Many good games or films will have details or other aspects that you'll only catch after already experiencing it for the first time, which enables further appreciation of their "vision"
>>739221317There's still people who mutilate their newborns' penis and you have a problem with those who love a game so much they're willing to replay it?
>>739230403Stop whining about something trivial like this, OP. Chad is deflowering 18 year old virgins in his harem while you're crying that you can't consume everything blind. Be more like Chad.
>>739221317Depends on the type of game.You mentioned two JRPGs, which tend to be long games but without much replayability, so I understand how you feel.Most of the time I beat these games once fair and square, but then look up online all the secrets I've missed because I can't be bothered to try finding everything myself in a 100+ hour game.But something like Dark Souls, that allows you to approach the gameplay in varied ways through different builds and equipment, can be very enjoyable during replays.Short arcade games that don't take more than an hour to beat are also good candidates for replays, since you're not going to master them in a single playthrough.
>>739221317I've got four words for you OP:I like having fun.
>>739222603Anyone who believes this has gaslit themselves into believing open world has good design in it. Older games that didn't have open world were not only amazing to play through once, they were amazing to play through again and again. That's how many people grew up when they couldn't afford many games, and that's why it's important to so many people.If you can't replay something that's supposed to be special to you, chances are it wasn't that special to begin with.
