[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_6968.jpg (443 KB, 2560x1441)
443 KB JPG
They are both going to suck
>>
>>739223360
>Eating pizza while someone rants outside the window
>>
Correct
>>
>>739223360
bottom one ain't coming out
>>
>I'm so cool and above it all
>>
I feel like GTAVI is going to take itself far too seriously. TES is just boring, always was.
>>
>>739223360
>The double pack
>>
>>739223360
GTAVI is guaranteed to be mediocre and TESVI has no chance of ever being good, as it is a Bethesda game
>>
both are over-hyped
>top has worldwide hype
>bottom has super fanboy lore syndrome (and mid gameplay)
>>
File: images(17).jpg (45 KB, 554x554)
45 KB JPG
>>739223360
... your bluud! Bleh!
>>
>>739223431
Nah, it wont do the same thing GTAIV did and flop. Contrarian youtuber glazers will pretend otherwise about that fact tho
>>
>how do we make GTAV2 good?
>people want a memorable protag
>a city with soul and good radio stations
>fun missions and side characters
>that's too much work
>let's just make a huge map and add a lot of graphics

>how do we make skyrim 2 good?
>people have played botw, bg3 and elden ring
>they expect at least something on that level
>that's too much work
>let's just make a huge map and add a lot of graphics
>>
>>739223431
It will probably be a balance between 4 and 5
>>
>>739223431
>>739223683
>>739223745
dan houser left rockstar because he wanted to do a cool serious story for gta 6 and take2 said it was "too dark" and kept rejecting the story pitch no matter how much they modified it, so i think its safe to say we're gonna get more of the gta 5 insincerity where they come close to something good but they get too scared to commit to the bit and defuse it some reddit one liners and wacky hijinks so it just ends up being flat and unmemorable
>>
Suck? Maybe. GTA6 will be politically loaded with "left-wing opinion good right-wing opinion bad" takes while you play a thicc Latina instead of fucking her.

TES6 suffers from being a Bethesda game, their DEI hires can't rework their dogshit engine into the last gen's territory, let alone next gen.
It also takes place in Hammerfell so expect 1000 BLM, Saint Floyd and We Wuz references with the Empire soldiers suddenly being pasty white.
>>
>>739223360
i don’t even understand gta hype. its an alright game that isnt even close to being worth $100
>>
>>739223889
>you play a thicc Latina instead of fucking her.
Half the GTA 6 trailer is Jason banging her
>>
>>739223360
You'll buy both.
>>
>>739224040
Which is a Naughtydog-tier move but some people are still brainwashed into thinking it's based and makes for good gameplay apparently.
>>
>>739224120
Prove it.
>>
>>739223360
GTA 6 will be decent enough if you like on rails missions like all of Rockstars open world games. Starfield sucked balls and so did Fallout 4 so don't expect much from Bethesda.
>>
>>739223360
I dunno if they're gonna strictly suck, but they'll be mid at best and everyone will be disappointed.
>>
>>739223702
>>let's just make a huge map and add a lot of graphics
Don't forget replacing the jokes with references to tiktoks
>>
I still don't get the GTAVI hype when GTAV was mediocre at best.
>>
>>739223702
I mean, in the case of Skyrim 2, I just want them to add back all the shit they removed from Oblivion and Morrowind. But that will never happen, so the game will be shit.
>>
>>739223889
Engine issues are not that big deal for TES6 compared to everything else you listed and their desire to monetize mods.
>>
>>739223360
>top: gay and urban
>bottom: gay and turban
200 dollars plus tip.
>>
>>739223861
Gta 5 was held back by Trevor and Franklin. Only michael was a proper character with depth and motivations. Everything Trevor did was randumb and Franklin had no personality then you had to scatterbrain do shit between them, with only Franklins and michaels missions being coherent together.
The Bonnie and Clyde route is something new and could easily be done well.
>>
>>739224348
I think GTA 5 was decent on release but after being stuck with it for years and no new GTA game for 13 years it's definitely mediocre. GTA SA and GTA 4 just had better protagonist and map design.
>>
>>739223421
So are you anon, have some self respect.
>>
>>739223360
Bottom can't suck if it doesn't exist
>>
>>739223360
By the time GTA6 comes out, /v/ will have unironically taken up Musk's stance that killing cops isn't good fun
>>
>>739223360
Both series did it for decades but (you) love them nevertheless
>>
>>739223360
GTA6 will be good.
Bethesda has been shitting out dogshit games since fallout 4 so only a retard would expect that TES6 will be good.
>>
>>739224846
Every Rockstar game has aged poorly. Every single one.
>>
I didn't care for GTA IV (didn't finish it) nor GTAV (one and done playthrough) which was good but nothing you'd want to keep replaying (decent writing, vast and immersive for its time world, good graphics that ran well). GTA was at its peak when it parodied past decades and cultures while cramming as many TV stereotypes and references as possible.
I'd be way more excited to play a well made San Andreas or Vice City remaster than modern safe-edgy commentary of modern US.
>>
>>739223360
TES6 cannot get much worse than Skyrim as far as the gameplay is concerned. However it won't have the charm of the world aesthetic and Jeremy Soule's music, so if it's just shit ass Skyrim with bland garbage aesthetic then yes I suppose it will be quite sucky.
>>
>>739224959
No they haven't RDR2 still looks better than a lot of new games and is constantly used as a comparison measuring stick.
>>
>>739223360
Elderscrolls was always bad though
>>
>>739225240
>Muh graphics
If you played any 3d gta then you played them all
>>
>>739223360
They both going to suck my dick so good you mean
>>
>>739223360
Top will have a female protagonist so I shan't be playing.
Bottom will need a decade of mods to make it palatable so by the time it is fixed by the community I'll have forgotten it exists.
>>
>>739224520
none of the characters are likable. michael is a backstabbing miserable prick and trevor is a craazy dude that is supposed to contrast him with his "honesty" (i.e., both are bad but michael refuses to admit it) but hes too far gone to be likable at all. franklin is just there and while he technically has a place in the story, he feels more like a side character for the dynamic of michael/trevor. the story never lets itself breathe or be sincere and rockstar canonized the worst, most unfulfilling ending in online by leaving all 3 protagonists alive. it had potential but i think gta 4's dismal tone getting a bad reception fucked it over, i wouldnt be surprised if take2 also interfered.
>>
>>739223360
Elder scrolls 6 will be good because of the massive mod support it'll get
>>
>>739226826
as for the bonnie and clyde story in gta 6, i hope they can do something good with it, i figure they want to do a gta 4 style ending where you choose which of the playable characters dies. we will see when it comes out but i dont have much faith with take2's interference, there will probably be an "opt out" happy ending option like in 5 which will be treated as the canon one if they are even allowed to include a darker ending option the first place
>>
File: 3258.jpg (154 KB, 816x720)
154 KB JPG
GTA VI will be good
TES VI will be shit
R*'s last game is one of the best AAA games of all time
SF is a turd and one of the worst games ever and
>>
>>739223421
goyim.
>>
>>739223702
Damn you already played GTA6
>>
>>739224348
RDR2 was great

>>739224959
You are a retarded faggot
>>
>>739223360
No way they fuck up GTA as a great sandbox. Should be similar for eso
>>
>>739224168
Post your hand.
>>
>>739223360
rdr2 was rad so i'm pretty confident they will deliver
>>
>>739223360
>the sky is blue
We needed a thread for this?
>>
>>739223360
I won't play either kek
>>739223393
It will and if you think saarfield was a flop, you aren't prepared yet
>>
>>739227768
>posts a pic of Rockstar's last good game
>but claims RDR3 was good for some reason
>>
>>739223431
Even if VI single player ends up sucking it's going to make a trillion dollars from the VI online portion and project R.O.M.E (FiveM2).
>>
>>739223861
Yet Dan wrote GTA V lol
I rather it be more like a mix of san andreas and IV.
>>
>>739231152
It's a guaranteed success, but it's still going to suck, like GTA has outside of 3 and VC.
>>
>>739223360

Bethesda products are a guaranteed suckfest nowadays. The old games were buggy as hell but had enough immersion and great questlines that people didn't mind, unfortunately that one jackass designer made everything streamlined so pretty much dumb down quest lines.

Red Dead 2 had so many dumbass time wasters and even simple things like loadout storage on horses wouldn't save. Sometimes you jumped off the horse and you have no rifles at all. Then there's the tedious animations and gesture to simply loot objects. GTA 6 will probably have a bunch of this crap along with the awful knees sunk in mud physics.
>>
Can`t wait for the obligatory side quest where a Trans "friend" needs hormones for kids and you have to rob multiple facilities for the hormones and in the end protect a gay parade to celebrate
>>
File: 1763659114633481.gif (80 KB, 170x207)
80 KB GIF
>>739223360
I don't really care or know if GTAVI will suck, I think V was perfectly serviceable despite in sacrificing so much from IV for visuals. IV is definitely the better game over all, but yeah.
TES hasn't been good since III, they butchered established lore for shareholder opinions and made Oblivion's setting as generic as possible with the ugliest characters in video game history, while prior lore was a footnote to add a little spice while not actually doing anything for the game, it spawned literally no discussion. Skyrim was much the same but even worse, but instead of shallow linear questlines over multiple locations it was shallow linear questlines in a single place that didn't let have a single choice of your own. You WILL become a werewolf and you WILL side with them instead of the werewolf hunters, because the werewolf hunters because they are generic NPCs with a different low-tier weapons. I've no doubt Starfield is the exact same thing, and FO4 with a voiced MC was their most tragic experiment yet, hence Starfield being just being shitty space Skyrim and not shitty space FO4.
>>
>>739231321
>this is what anon dreams of in his free time
calm down lad good lord
>>
I am curious on just how much more they can fuck up Skyrim 2 on a technical level and how much more they can ruin casters.
>>
>>739231494
what was sacrificed for visuals
>>
>>739231321
Rockstar is big enough that they actually do market research bro, nothing of that sort is ever going to be in the game. It's still going to be littered with faggots, but not on the idpol brainrot level you're on.
>>
>>739231282
One of the first major changes in RDO was loot animation speed.
It's not really a problem in single player but RDO where you're basically looting like 50000 enemies each play session it definitely needed to speed up.

I hate that they zoomerfied all the other animations though, pvp was way more fun with realistic movement.
>>
Both jeeted titles, I expect poo
>>
>>739223360
toddslop was never good
>>
>>739231089
>and if you think saarfield was a flop
It wasn't. It sold well on pc and xbox, and sold well on ps5 too. TES6 will sell even better.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.