This never had a physical on the 360. It's not on the Xbox store. I will never be able to play this on my series x.
>>747679831not a single good game there
Aren't those on pc?
All available on steam btw
>>747679831The remasters kinda look weird anyway. Best way to play is emulating the Gamecube ports.
>>747680562Thank you. I'll take this advice.
>>747680562Is Xbox better on original hardware?
>>747681164I assume it looks and runs the best if you can track down an original copy and working OG Xbox.
>>747679831>the exclusive levels of WW and TT are currently back-ported to the PC versionWhat a time to be alive.
You can play sands of time on the xbox one if you get a disc copy it's BC supportedAlso the remasters fuck with the games audio so either play the originals on console or mod the PC release
>>747679831Ya PS3 got a few of those PS2 "hd" trilogies on PS3. Most of them were PS2 exclusives at the time, but you did have ones like the Splinter Cell Trilogy as well.
>>747684383Are those worth playing? I was thinking of grabbing the Sly Cooper and Ratchet and Clank ones.
>>747681164Outside of the most popular games emulation isn't that great.
>>747679831they aged like milk
>>747685910The platforming holds up nicely and The Prince is still very charming.The combat though...probably should have just cut that out completely.
>>747687013That's why sands of time is king. The combat is an after thought in it
>>747687013The platforming is still like a generation or 2 ahead of the shitty AAA climbing popularized by Uncharted we get in every game now.
>>747684484They're playable but have some weird visual bugs.The worst is Ratchet's helmet floating in every cutscene.
>>747679831Just finished the Lost Crown, it's actually really good.Remember to use some skin mod to have a character that actually fits the era though
>>747689341I've heard it's a great game launched at an inappropriate price. It was like 50 dollars at launch I believe.
>>747681164dont og xbox versions have more content?
