File: enlisted_2025-08-15_07-30-49.png (1.37 MB, 1180x567)

1.37 MB PNG

what did they mean by this

>>537558112
This will be Active Matter general soon

>>537566651
I doubt it

Shovel upgrade path when

>>537569427
2026

>>537566651
you have have a game people want to play to have a general

What do we think about the last weapons changes ?
https://enlisted.net/en/news/show/952-weapon-battle-rating-changes-en/#!/
https://enlisted.net/en/news/show/948-making-enlisted-a-better-place-71-en/#!/
- GERMANY -
>rifle
Gewehr 98 with scope mount: BR changed from II to I.
- USSR -
>rifle
Mosin M91 "Infantry": BR changed from II to I.
>lmg
Gorov LMG increased base damage from 12 to 12.7
>smg
PPD 1929: BR changed from IV to III.
"Uragan" SMG: BR changed from II to III.
- OTHER -
Arisaka Mortar: removed time delayed fuze
Type A sword-pistol: increased sprint speed multiplier from 100% to 150% to be in line with other swords.
Tomahawk: increased the sprint speed modifier from 100% to 120%.
Lanciafiamme Mod.35: BR changed from V to IV..
Flamethrower portable No.2 Mk 1: BR changed from V to IV.

>>537576897
- JAPAN -
>rifle
Type Ko rifle: increased base damage from 11.2 to 11.7
Type Otsu rifle: reduced base damage from 11.6 to 11.5
Type Hei rifle (late): increased base damage from 11.6 to 11.7, BR changed from IV to III.
Type Hei Automatic rifle: increased weight from 4.9 to 6.7 kg
>smg
Type 100 SMG (early): increased base rate of fire from 450 to 700, increased weight from 3.8 to 4.2 kg, base damage reduced from 6.0 to 5.6, BR changed from I to II.
Type 100 Paratrooper SMG: increased base rate of fire from 450 to 700, increased weight from 3.8 to 4.3 kg, base damage reduced from 6.0 to 5.6, BR changed from I to II.
Type 100 SMG (late): base damage reduced from 6.0 to 5.6.
Tokyo Arsenal SMG: added semi-auto firing mode
Type 1 SMG: increased base rate of fire from 500 to 620
Type 2 SMG: increased base rate of fire from 600 to 750
Type 2a SMG: increased base rate of fire from 600 to 750, BR changed from II to III.
SIG 1920: changed caliber from 7.65 Parabellum to 7.63 Mauser, increased base damage from 5.5 to 5.7, increased weight from 4.2 to 5 kg
>lmg
Type 11 LMG: reduced recoil by 18%
Type 96 LMG: reduced recoil by 21%, increased weight from 9 to 9.3 kg
Type 97 LMG: increased weight from 12.4 to 16.2 kg, reduced sprint speed modifier from 50% to 45%
Type 99 LMG: reduced base rate of fire from 800 to 550, reduced weight from 12 to 10.6 kg, increased sprint speed modifier from 50% to 55%
KE7: increased weight from 8.2 to 9 kg
Te-4 MG: reduced recoil by 18%, increased weight from 9.3 to 14 kg, reduced sprint speed modifier from 50% to 45%
Type Hei LMG: reduced weight from 10 to 9.3 kg
Type 100 MG: increased weight from 16 to 20 kg, reduced sprint speed modifier from 50% to 40%, removed semi-auto firing mode, increased base rate of fire from 600×2 to 1000×2, improved accuracy to match other high BR machine guns

>>537576897
I like the type hei late being BR3 now, with the type 2 also being BR
almost makes BR3 viable, if not for BR2 and 5 taking up all my squads

I like the erma EMP and the beretta M31
I almost don't regret buying this pack

I like the dicker max because you can actually hop inside and use it as a retarded piece of cover unlike the SU-76

>>537576897
The M91 Infantry having its BR changed is hilarious because I think under 10 active players even have it in their inventories. It's arguably the single rarest thing in the entire game.

>>537581030
The EMP is a fun gun. Redundant but fun, and it looks kickass.

File: 1725354195213610.jpg (792 KB, 1920x1080)

792 KB JPG

>Best guy on the enemy team starts getting some pushback at BR I
>Busts out his Matilda (he is the match's only down-tiered BR II by the looks of it, everyone else has BR I gear)
>Matilda is effectively unkillable without a HEAT launcher
>He farms a shitload of kills
>And loses terribly, his team burning 500+ tickets on the third cap without him after having success on the first few caps
I gotta say, playing only BR I gear with a focus on bolt actions against a guy who has powerful BR II gear and troops really fucking sucks. It didn't help that he would do things like shutter-step in and out of cover with his automatics while hosing down your squads. Now, for me, and probably most other people, that doesn't work since AI can (and will) track you through terrain and pop you in the quarter second you expose yourself, but it seemed to work a charm for him. He was good at the game besides that.

Not the best payout for such a large booster. Basically 30k silver since 224k XP converts to 4.5k silver.

>>537592437
BR1 getting uptiered to BR2 is the biggest pain that almost nobody talks about, probably because most people who stick with the game move on to BR2 equipment pretty soon, but going back to BR1 every now and then just to have pure bolties and then getting stuck with a bunch of guys running MG squads sucks
>no rallies because 75% of the players in the match aren't running an engie
>vehicles instantly deleted by uptiered AT equipment or vehicles
>some other guy who also went back to BR1 but it's just hogging the planes
>at least 3 players on the team staying back sniping

>>537596819
If we are going back to BR I we kinda deserve it since people go back to BR I for a relatively easy time, but newfags don't deserve to get dunked on. The power gap between BR I and II is similar to the power gap between IV and V, though not as bad, it's still pretty oppressive.

Making it so BR I can't up-tier would be disastrous and would kill the already tenuous BR II, but I dunno, maybe they could limit the amount of BR II players who can be in a BR I match, or make it so players under a certain amount of matches played can't be up-tiered? I still have a 575% booster active and wanna get some use out of it so I will probably play BR I again since that's where my most and favourite premiums are.

>hellfire rangers
>solid bolty squad
>solid tank squad
>solid subgun squad
>decent semi-auto squad

damn, that's a good bundle

>>537598280
It's not terrible but the G30M is a bit... meh. The squad is "fine", I guess. Back when full-caliber, high damage semi-autos weren't ubiquitous it was better, and the Americans are getting the Kretz semi-auto soon enough, which does full damage despite being in .276. The UD M42 is surprisingly good despite my initial impressions of it (I used it in the bundle preview) and the Moroccan squad is a pure meme.

The M24 is really fucking good.

>>537598761
I've already got the M24 and love it so the rest is kinda tempting for how discounted it is but I don't feel like getting it
maybe next update if I feel like throwing away money for pixels again

>>537577091
Both gold order heis are still worse than the Type 4

>>537599109
The Moroccans went from fun to powerful with the knife buff. They are great for defending since you can spam down 9 mines, then get them to hold the cap while you run around with your knife out from position to position and healing yourself to full every time.

>>537599218
This is true, but they are also extremely easy to use. The Type Hei (Late) has laser beam accuracy for a semi-auto. The Hino is definitely better but there's something "off" about it I can't place. Whenever I use it, I feel like my bullets just miss. Dunno, maybe I am a shitter.

>>537599404
>The Hino is definitely better but there's something "off" about it I can't place.
You're supposed to use horizontal reduction

>>537599610
It's not the recoil, the shots just seem to miss, even though it has just about standard dispersion.

>>537599218
I... disagree, personally
I genuinely prefer the hei to the type 4, the type 4 has a piss reload even though they allegedly made 10 round clips for it

>>537599986
It's the damage. Damage is huge on a semi auto and the Type 4 has more while other differences are comparably insignificant.

>>537600093
This is true, the Type 4 also has less horizontal recoil than it appears to due to hidden modifiers, like how the Otsu has literally 0 actual recoil (or used to?).

>>537600093
I prefer the sight picture of the Heis over the type 4, ironically in spite of the toggle lock constantly shoving its bolt in your picture

>>537589301
What was that equivalent to? The box Springfield and trench k98?

>>537598280
buy a banner gayjew

>>537597093
Eh, I feel it depends on each faction, but yeah, it's mostly newbies so if I want to keep in low tiers I mostly stick to BR2
For BR1, allies is doing a public service to the 2 new guys who are actually pushing the objective and need whatever help they can get
Soviet and axis I feel are a mixed bag, I noticed constant BR2 uptiers in your and the enemy teams, so by sticking to BR1 you're just handicapping yourself, although I guess new players who are playing their first matches as soviets because they're the default faction will appreciate having rally spawns, I know I did when I first started playing
Japan I have no idea, never even played them besides last month's event, but by the reputation they have and seeing they only face western allies rn, I assume their BR1 is the most sealclubbing of the lot

>>537603373
Yeah, it's just a Mosin that deals 32 damage, which is crazy, but it also fires at 48 RPM. I'd kill someone for a chance to get the Trench, Air Service and Infantry. I would even paypig for a set of them. Unfortunately the SAS has meh sights. The Kar and Mosin are fine.

>>537605727
BR I Japan used to be consistently good, then it became absurdly overpowered, now it's shitty. It's a bit bizarre.

Is it just my computer just randomly deciding to perform better or is the game smoother?

File: 1748167672513144.jpg (774 KB, 1920x1080)

774 KB JPG

The average Soviet player is pretty bad, but they are also popular with totally legit and cool Chinese players who make up for that.

>>537609403
Also in this match I swear I counted like 5 separate incidents where my body armour saved me.

this new spitfire is nuts wtf. this thing could hang at br5

>>537621027
In War Thunder it is BR 5.7, so it's a BR IV-V vehicle.

NEWS!

https://enlisted.net/en/news/show/953-new-engineer-structures-shovel-destructable-buildings-upgrade-paths#!/

lol

Sim city fags on suicide watch

Holy fuck the Lanchester Model 1 is so bad holy FUCK.

>>537634913
Its actually really good with ass4s

File: 1726437497774840.jpg (1.01 MB, 958x1001)

1.01 MB JPG

>>537635606
It's absolutely not. The recoil is fucking bananas in both directions. If you take horizontal, it flies up your screen. If you take vertical, it jitters around like crazy. Even WITH horizontal, it jitters around like crazy because it still has 8 fucking horizontal recoil after reductions. It's like a worse M1928A1 Thompson, and nobody uses the M1928A1 because it's so fucking uncomfortable. All it really has going for it is crazy high ADS speed. Its recoil direction stat is also really low, which sounds great, but it's not 0, so what happens is it pulls left and right in a snake pattern at random, which is nearly impossible to account for compared to a high recoil dir stat in either direction, which either pulls left or right! When I switch to it, I immediately have to adjust and change how my mind functions, there's always that period of "oh god oh fuck".

File: 1752641986688754.webm (2.52 MB, 1152x648)

2.52 MB WEBM

>>537636672
Dat ADS speed do be crazy dough. Admittedly this is with +20% stacked on but dang it's instant.

>>537636672
>bitching about 8 horizontal
It's a hip fire monster and is fine out to mid range if you tap fire. It's a good point blank assaulter weapon. The only option that's clearly superior to it is the 30 Thompson which is a meaningless comparison because that is better than everything the allies get at 3

>>537649747
8 hori WITH reduction, coupled with a low-but-not-zero recoil dir stat means the damn thing flies randomly left and right, even when hipfiring. It's not even better than the M1928A1 Thompson which has higher DPS, counters Vit, lower recoil, and a nearly instant reload even on empty that can be dropped to 1.2 seconds even with horizontal reduction.

Ironically, saying the hipfire of the Lanchester is an advantage is completely nullifying its singular noteworthy positive trait: the nearly instant ADS that makes it useful for snapfiring indoors. It is a gun that trades all versatility to be pretty good at something that basically every SMG at its BR is also adequately good at, similar to the OVP and Beretta M1918, but even more extreme. That extra 100 ROF over the Thompson does not make it worthwhile, especially since that advantage is nullified against Vitality targets outside of 10 meters anyway.

>>537651203
Actually the M1918 is a good comparison because it has a higher ROF with lower recoil, 0 recoil direction which means it pulls STRAIGHT UP, and a faster hot reload, similar empty reload, and basically just trades 7 rounds of mag capacity and ADS time. And nobody uses the M1918 because it's too difficult for most people.

>>537651829
Oh and it has a bayonet (reducing recoil a bit more!). I think I was wrong about the reload though.

>>537651203
I use it just fine, there is zero reason to ADS up close as it just deletes everything in a cone of fire. It's a nice variety weapon at BR3 if you dont care for the Thompson or Lan 50. The extra MV makes it better at range than the Thompson too if you have even the smallest ability to control recoil and not just hold down the trigger. Sounds like you have a skill issue if you are having this much trouble bursting down enemies. The Erma (S) used to and probably still should have a 16/16 recoil stat and it was very strong then too.
Bitching about single digit horizontal is the kind of outrageous minmaxing spreadsheet I-need-the-game-to-play-itself-ism that I have no respect for whatsoever. Learn how to tap fire

>>537652193
>Look, if you just use it badly, in ways you don't have to use other SMGs, and ignore its actual advantages then it's actually fine
Bizarre contrarianism. You should be using the Beretta M1918 at BR III, since it's the better weapon in every way besides mag size. Why would I ever "tapfire" my SMG when I can just not zoom in with my 1928A1 Thompson while holding LMB and wipe an entire squad in two seconds?

I know a lot of people struggle with this, but: something you like can be ineffective or bad. You can enjoy it, but that doesn't make it competitive or good. Killing enemies at point blank 10ms faster in exchange for being significantly worse in every other way is your prerogative.

>>537653014
It's very funny to be filtered by basic trigger discipline. There isn't really any firearm designed for an all or nothing mag dump and this game replicates that authentically. The solution to weapons with actual recoil is to use them appropriately.

I know you struggle with this, but you don't get to be the arbiter of what is effective or bad. Those are value judgements dependent on individual skill levels and preferences. When you are combing through the resource looking at numbers you are making value judgements based on how you like to play the game. Weapons that have trade offs you don't like may feel right at home in another's hands.

There are very few weapons that are absolutely irredeemable. Even the delisle feels kind of good after the buff it received

File: 1743269422098263.jpg (8 KB, 225x225)

8 KB JPG

>>537654029
>The solution to weapons with actual recoil is to use them appropriately.
Or, you know. Use something better that isn't notoriously bad? Also, bringing up the EMP is insanely disingenuous because its STAT CARD (!!!!!) recoil was 16/16, which meant it was actually 8/8, which meant it was actually 8/5 with horizontal reduction, while firing 30% slower than the Lanchester, and coupled with a 0.6 recoil dir, which meant it just pulled hard right, making it EXTREMELY easy to pull onto target.

>Weapons that have trade offs you don't like may feel right at home in another's hands.
I... I guess you can keep using your Lanchester Model 1 as a really bad PCC with unremarkable hipfire instead of taking advantage of its actual singular advantage if that makes you feel better or special for using something notoriously obnoxious to use? I am gonna keep my Lanchester equipped because it's neato, and I like using it for variety, but that won't ever make it anything other than a curio that fluctuates between "oh thank God I am in a position to use this properly for once" and "oh cool my SMG is a glorified Hi-Power here".

Again: you should use the M1918 at BR III, since it's better than the Lanchester in every conceivable way besides mag size.

>>537654561
Let's not get ahead of ourselves. They should give the De Lisle a 3x damage headshot modifier so it has a niche for people who are good at snap shots. You are right in the sense that a lot of guns are usable, the truly "bad" guns are ones that just feel annoying or weird to use. For a lot of people, that's the ZH-29 with its negative recoil direction, or top-loading guns.

File: 250g-silver-bar-our-choice-new.jpg (442 KB, 1680x1306)

442 KB JPG

Tourist here. The fuck do you people do for silver gains? I average 3-7k score on my recent entry into BR3 and goddamn, do I need to grind the next six months and or sell a kidney to upgrade to the next tier of soldiers and guns?

>>537656426
Buy premium time on sale.
Use boosters effectively.
That's all you can do.
Premium squads are generally hit or miss, and most people will tell you to not upgrade to the next tier until you have unlocked all the "key" items and upgraded the necessary squads by arming them with lower tier gear and playing them at a lower BR.

>>537656572
So it's put out or get out? Not unexpected for a "f2p" I guess. Alright man, thanks.

>>537657357
You can slowly grind up but it will take a while. The only things actually worth buying in this game are premium time (20 bucks yearly) and like 2 squad slots for each nation on sale.

so like, the progression is I>II>III>V?
IV takes too much silver and you fight V anyways?

>>537660807
Yeah, you can mostly not bother playing IV for now. Some IV gear is okay like the Kiraly for tankers or pilots.

>>537660807
I like IV, and it's competitive enough with BR5
unless you're american or russian and dealing with KTniggers

What a pain it is to level Jap Tanker squads. The lack of machine guns, the tanks prioritising the machine gunner position, coupled with the reload makes me want to tear my hair out

>>537670106
At least they made the upgrade costs more reasonable?

>>537670106
your ho-i?

>>537673438
Even the Ho-I suffers the Hull MG problem, which is prioritised over the fucking LOADER.

When will the T-28 get the hull MG mechanics that Japan has

>>537674269
doesn't the T-28 have bugged machine gunners that always shoot no matter how alive or dead they are?

>>537674269
>>537674383
Yeah, they are phantoms. They are also kinda the only really notably good thing about the T-28 and nerfing them would make it a realistic death trap.

>>537674383
Yes

File: 1755957151785.png (99 KB, 511x329)

99 KB PNG

>>537654974
I literally have no issue running the Lan 1 as a spawn next to the point and blitz squad complementary to my Lan 50 squad which I use for longer range work. I prefer it over the Thompson for its sights, MV, and fugly britishness. I have used the 1928 in its place and wasn't impressed. Coming back to the Lan 1 on ass4s after not using it for awhile legitimately feels like it was stealth buffed. Many weapons with lots of spread or scatter feel really good laying down a wide cone of death in room to room engagements and the Lan 1 is a principle example. It's basically a BR3 obrez and is excellent in that capacity. The comparison to the 1918 is poorly made because these weapons should be considered in context of the factions available equipment not whatever statistical similarity you are fixated on. Would I rather have a ppsh? Sure I guess? But the Lan 1 is basically ppsh at home and can be used well in that niche. If you want to play the weapon like something it isn't that is on you.

The delisle can tear ass at BR1 if 1) you have good aim 2) you are in a low profile position on the flank or behind the enemy. Double tapping is trivial with its RoF and the standard ammo pool is obscene which is great for BR1 crowd control. The damage buff and fixed sights helped it quite a bit also. It's one of the higher skill weapons in the game but not the garbage rod it formerly was. I wouldn't be opposed to another damage buff but it would be obscenely OP in a good players hands with that kind of change.

>>537677368
>I wouldn't be opposed to another damage buff but it would be obscenely OP in a good players hands with that kind of change.
This is already true of the M1 Carbine and the BP pistol carbines.

>>537664898
BR4 sucks cock stop trying to trick newfags, an absolute waste of time and resources for new players and they will just bounce off the game

>>537677897
We're not all the same person, I only advocate BR4 for people with a lot of BR4 event and premium toys.

>>537677568
And now remove bot aggro at BR1 lol

>>537678032
And yet you're shilling it as competitive to a newfag with presumably none of that

>>537678101
If you can pop headshots from like 20-30 meters away with an M1 or pistol carbine then bots aren't really gonna react fast anyway.

>>537678292
I'm not him, but you clearly think that he's me

>>537678389
Motherfuckers don't know that I'm him

>>537678356
Absolutely not true. They will automatically face unsuppressed gunfire and dome you if you aren't behind cover

>>537678771
FALSE: this only happens to me and NOT to other players. Source: every match where some guy stands perfectly still out in the open slowly mowing my troops down with a Grease Gun.

>>537678389
>respond to a post replying to someone else without clarifying NTA on an anonymous image board
>get hung up on not being the same person like it at all matters in anyway
You are fucking stupid lol. BR4 is worthless for non paypigs, non oldfags, or anyone without an optimized line up. Those without shouldn't bother, and any anon shilling it without that disclaimer can catch this reply

Consider the following: the FNAB-43 should have its ROF increased to 730 RPM + 15% (its IRL max ROF was 840) and have its accuracy reduced and its recoil increased, and bump it up to BR III since nobody fucking uses it. Or just do the same and give it really shitty accuracy and keep it at BR II as a contender against the PPS-43. As it exists, it's both ahistorical and a massive noob trap. Basically, it should be a tree equivalent of the MAS-38.

>>537677897
oh no you'll be forced to use tigers, panthers, MG42s, good submachine guns, and the best semi-auto rifles
you'll be made to use the jumbo! and the horrible, no good T-34-85! you'll have to use nothing but the DT-29 and the 76 shermans! the horrors!

aside from autorifles and tanks, BR4 is fine even without event weapons and squads

>>537679909
There are very few players masochistic enough to enjoy reliable uptiers to get farmed by autorifles, jets, and heavy armor, while themselves being limited to much weaker options. Getting thrashed by worse players with broken equipment sucks ass. You are delusional for thinking otherwise

>>537680756
Sounds like a skill issue

>>537677368
>The comparison to the 1918 is poorly made because these weapons should be considered in context of the factions available equipment not whatever statistical similarity you are fixated on
Except it's not. They fill the same niche. The other SMGs that the Germans have at BR III are the Beretta (accurate, big mag, lower rate of fire) and the ZK-383 (smaller mag, higher ROF, also super accurate actually). In this context, the 1918 would fill the same niche the Lanchester does: extremely high ROF. They have the same niche within their trees. Arguably the 1918 fills it better since it has a MUCH higher ROF than the ZK, while the Lanchester only has a slightly higher ROF than the Thompson (I'd argue the 1918 is a better gun than the Lanchester in general, but that's neither here nor there). Laying down a hipfire "cone of death", especially with a gun that flies from side to side like the Lanchester, is also a really, really terrible strategy compared to snap shooting or just using your damn sights. Hell, if we wanna talk about hipfire, even the M1928A1 Thompson has more accurate and reliable hipfire accuracy, which is compounded by the fact that it has higher damage, meaning that a leg shot + a body shot against a vitality-using target is a guaranteed down, whereas the same isn't true of the lower damage Lanchester Model 1, which against a Vitality using target would require 2 legshots and a bodyshot or a bodyshot and 2 legshots to kill, completely negating its ROF, which is its ONLY advantage besides ADS speed, which... we aren't using.

I find the idea of taking a gun with a singular distinct advantage (ADS speed) and totally dismissing it extremely bizarre. I cannot really stress to people who haven't used it how much the bullets from the Lanchester just fucking fly everywhere when hipfired.

>>537679909
>Aside from needing to endure [THE MOST COMMON OVERPOWERED AND OPPRESSIVE THINGS AT BR V], BR IV is fine!
Is everyone smoking crack today?

>>537681021
Get fucked faggot taking a position with "the best semi autos" like the ZH against fuckers with T20s in the windows is a dogshit experience. The power gap is too large. But sure spawning a helpless jumbo against a king tiger is a "skill issue" if you are a disingenuous cock sucker

File: 1755920015137999.png (120 KB, 320x240)

120 KB PNG

>>537681305
>bodyshot and 2 legshots to kill,
I meant "a legshot and two bodyshots". I guess my ultimate point is that, if your position is:
>it shoot fastlier, it mean it goodlier for hipfire :)

Then you really SHOULD be using the 1918, since it shoot fastlier. Even fastlier than the BR II tree options. The gap in shooting fastlier between the ZK and the Beretta 1918 is bigger than the gap between the Thompson and the Lanny.

>>537681627
Wrong person again. I cycle MG-45, MG-42 Early, and Mauser MKbs when I have to try.

fighting BR5 as BR4 is barely any different than getting bullied by shermans and P38s s a BR2 german, except your AT guns can somewhat reliably pen KTs at least

>>537681305
We seem to be talking past each other here. My point is that the spread (inaccuracy) of the Lan 1 is an asset for squad wiping rooms at point blank range. I'm talking about ranges where hip fire accuracy is actually a negative attribute as you will get killed by a bot before you can cycle through all the targets huddled in the corner of a room. The mobility on a ass4 means you can just press a position and tear it up before the enemy can react. The 1918 is a different class of weapon with its laser hip fire spread and as I said a better comparison would be to the obrez, another stockless SMG. Sure the fast ads is helpful for hitting the stragglers at the far side of the room but the best way to use the weapon is to get in close and unload into a crowd before they can react, again just like the obrez. It's a highly specialized and therefore situational SMG but it is very viable when played correctly. Try it some time if you don't believe me.

>>537681776
>that's not me haha owned!
Who cares you insipid retard
>I'm a sweaty paypig who quits every uptier
No one asked you south park faggot

>>537681634
I can't give the 1918 to my British assault squad though

>>537682939
I carry every uptier, hence
>skill issue

>>537682472
>Reliably pen KTs
What? If you mean handheld AT, then no? You have to aim for the turret face, which is extremely fucky thanks to the gun mantlet (while also being a tiny target), and is not likely to do much damage anyway. The Panzerfaust 100 can, in theory, pen the UFP, but only from a very advantageous angle. The BR V AT structures get APDS, which can work, but... you know. It's APDS. It's like shooting needles that do no damage. Also:

>muh sherman muh p-38
Buddy, the P-38 is basically a non-issue after the M8 nerfs and can be shot down by an AA gun that takes two seconds to build, and Shermans can be killed by the GrB-39, as can T-34s and KV-1s. Keep in mind that at BR II the Germans get a Ju-87 D-5 with 2x20mm and 450kg of bombs.

>>537682709
Being so close to someone that hipfire accuracy is a negative is how you get bayonet stabbed.

>>537683287
Then you should be giving it to your Italians when you play BR III.

>>537683404
>I don't quit, I carry every game I ever played
I don't believe you, and the ego some of you morons get from farming bots, children, and thirdies is insane.
>not wanting to play everything optimally and abuse adhd meds to enjoy a videogame is a skill issue
Blow it out of your ass you fat sperg with a cringe handle

>>537684076
>you're not that good, I know you quit half your matches
>also I'm a casual and you obviously take stimulants to be this good
make up your mind

>>537684494
Sweatfags still quit retard
And yes the world is awash in chemical stimulants morons abuse and fry their brains with

And if not slavishly following the meta makes me a casual then so be it. I play this game to use obscure weapons, not pretend it's esports

>Paradivision keeps calling Japan the "weakest faction" and insists the Soviets are "way stronger"
>Says Japan post-buffs and BR changes is "worse" than it was before, even though all that really changed was the Type 100 (Early) moving to BR II and the Type 2a moving to BR III, which is more like an arbitrary reshuffling than anything else
Is he ever right about anything anymore? Like, the Type 100 and Type 2a are still, you know, monstrously strong at their BRs?

>Bitches about the Panzer III N being "unplayable" even though it shits out 115mm HEAT shells that are more powerful than HE shells against infantry and are able to penetrate every tank it faces with ease every 2 seconds while also having 80mm of hull armour and being superior to the T-34 in every way
Jesus fuck. He also implied the Type 100, post-buff, was "harder to control" despite having almost no recoil and basically being a laser beam drill. Fuck me.

>>537683602
My shitaly assmen are at BR1&2 and I have no room in germ BR3 anyway. I've always liked the 1918, enough to buy the old Moscow premium twice, so I run it at 2 occasionally

>>537685067
Also:
>Says the Type 2a is "bad at close range" and "good at long range" despite its core issue being that it has terrible damage drop off
>Says the Thompsons are "better at close range" even though the advantage of the Thompson is that it retains damage over distance

He's actually just a fucking delusional retard, I want to scream at him and call him a moron to his face. Holy fuck.

>>537685350
Find out where he lives and yell at him. Someone used to post the quadro dox here lol

>>537679909
without a severe autorifle nerf it will always be a dead BR no matter how much shit they shovel into it

>>537685350
>>537685647
I am still mad:
>Says the G98 Sniper only has "a little more damage" than the Kar 98k
>It has 4.9 more damage
>Meaning it retains the ability to have a guaranteed one-shot-kill against targets FAR further than the Kar 98 Sniper, including Vitality targets
>Doesn't even mention how the real issue with the G98 is that it has a weak as fuck scope compared to the Kar
>Cries about the poor German snipers needing to reload shots one-by-one, even though that's STANDARD
>AND THE GERMANS GET A CLIP LOADING BR I SNIPER ANYWAY (THE SHORT CARCANO)
>THE GERMAN SINGLE SHOT RELOADS AREN'T EVEN AS BAD AS THE MOSIN'S FUCK AWFUL RELOAD (BUT RUSSIA OP BTW)
The only thing he is right about is that the PPS-43 is better than the Uragan, but he doesn't even specify why and isn't even aware that using the PPS dual wielded with an Uragan is significantly better than dual wielding PPS variants.

Implying the Type 100 (Early) was in any way acceptable as a BR I gun is so fucking retarded and disingenuous. He also implied the Americans are the strongest nation right now, but I cannot imagine what metric makes that true. The Thompson at BR II... I guess? If we look exclusively at tree stuff then the Germans are better at BR I, III, IV and V, and the Russians are arguably better at BR I, III, IV and V too.

>>537685067
I really cannot stress how retarded it is to call the Type 100 (Early) with its current stats "bad" at BR II when it's a better weapon than the supposedly overpowered PPS-43.

>>537684879
I've got the StG-45M, MG-39, and Fliegerfaust squads ready to screw around in downtiers. But the aforementioned trio are what I need in an uptier.

I have yet to use the fliegerfaust for anything other than harassing one specific dude every now and then

>>537686864
you could maybe make an argument for BR5 with the meteor being at least as oppressive as the T2H and situationally more so but its kind of a stretch with how mutt teams actually are in general

>>537688271
When you get the opportunity it’s great fun. Feels amazing when you kill planes. You can wipe clustered points, you can take out APCs.

>>537687574
K man you can sweat your premshit lineup against majority uptiers awash in autorifles but don't tell anyone they have a skill issue for wanting to avoid the enlisted equivalent of flattening your dick with a hammer. Literally any other BR has a higher chance of being enjoyable

>>537693367
I downtier all the time. US has a lot of BR3 players.

I take it back, BR4 kinda sucks

File: 1747432619432378.jpg (26 KB, 480x360)

26 KB JPG

>>537656426
>dat silver grind
you werent here in 2024. you have no idea how bad it used to be

File: ss_1ca17fe4ccb809c262f244(...).jpg (352 KB, 1920x1080)

352 KB JPG

>they didn't buy shares in the next big WWII game
it's over for enlisted

>>537701707
Huh?

>>537701707
>ass rain
lol lmao even

Komet

>>537701707
That nigga got some nice veneers for a man born in 1920.

Why do the Japs, Americans and Bongs have such boring customisation still?

>>537566651
Launching 2 months before Tarkov 1.0 lol

Berlin maps are actually pretty fun in low br games

>>537720747
They are way better than Normandy maps, which are often nightmarish and entirely predicated on the attacking team having access to extremely high firepower to break through stalemates. A lot of the maps have points that are easy to defend, but also fall apart to fast ambushes due to their small size, and are also vulnerable to some HVARs or bombing runs.

>>537720747
Yeah I can use my Lebel Volksturm without feeling guilty for my teammates.

>>537721115
All Normandy maps should have secondary objectives to trigger smoke barrage or alternate spawns

>>537721820
ALL maps should have secondary objectives that change the battlefield or give more tickets.

>>537721958
Nah there are maps where ticket drain is pretty finely tuned putting the airfield balloon mechanic in more would fuck things up

>>537722469
It could even just be something like the defenders have some logistics trucks parked off to the side that can be blown up for 50 tickets, or there is an artillery emplacement you can repair that can be used to call in smoke or WP on and around the point as attackers.

>“What a lovely day!”

>>537726461
YOU WORTHLESS COCKROACHES

DIE you RAT!

>ANOTHER HAPPY CUSTOMER

That last cap on Ver-ser-Mur (South) is so fucking absurd to take as attackers. The defenders can just sit a tank or two (or three if they have the APC with the 75) in the little valleys and shell into the cap and make it effectively impossible to take. It's retarded. You legit just have to click every few seconds and get a free 4-10 kills.

>Gaijin nerfs the Type 99's ROF to make it a shittier Type 96 for... some reason
Just stick a fucking scope on it! Then people might use the piece of shit!

>>537737417
I had been wondering if after that change it dropping to BR2 would be justified. I still haven't tried it after the change.

>>537738195
Post-change it's just a Type 96 with a bit more damage (kinda redundant since it's a 2 shot kill on Vitality anyway?) and actual recoil, since the 96 has no recoil and is a laser beam. The Japs don't need another BR II MG, but giving a scope to the Type 99 would at least give it a niche.

Holy fuck dealing with the M4A3 as the Japs on the old Pacific maps is such a fucking nightmare. It's fine on Myansera but trying to snipe the thing with your shitty AT launchers at 200 meters is horrible.

>>537701707
There's been dozens of them by now though

I sleep for 10 days

is there any reason to use the 34/38

>>537656426
You got the spared the worst

https://forum.enlisted.net/en/t/sent-back-for-revision-almost-ready-silver-economy-improvements/146121?page=17

File: 1738510458502261.jpg (268 KB, 1920x1080)

268 KB JPG

>no news
dead gayme

>>537721769
I took my Lebel boys out for a spin recently too, and I must say the rifle feels very stable. You easily get into a good shooting rhythm using it. It's all at once easy, fun, relaxing, and effective.

File: worldwar.jpg (103 KB, 1079x1080)

103 KB JPG

Nobody has said jack about the Zwilling BF109 yet! How do the four 30mm cannons work? Do they shoot HE like the Fw 190's?

>>537792554
The bomb is very hard to aim and 4 is a dead BR. Both the 9 spitfire and meteor shit all over it and they are ever present. I dont think there are any 30mm without HE. It's good at strafing the ground but is heavily dependent on the enemy being in an open field and you knowing exactly where to shoot. It should be BR3

>>537798260
>I dont think there are any 30mm without HE
But I could swear my ground strafes with the Schwalbe are less potent than my strafes with the Dora

>>537798527
I have no idea how you could possibly think that, the 262 has 3 more in the nose with much more ammo, maybe you are firing too late and not compensating for drop with the slimmer strafing window on a faster plane. The cannons on the Z are much more spaced out than the nose mounted ones on the other two so you should get used to spray and pray if you intend to use it

>>537792554
I already posted about it. It eats bomber waves alive, has great spread for strafing on the ground, and overall has a pretty potent armament in the air. But it doesn't fly well, it's in the same squad as the Jabo, and generally only excels in niche meme categories instead of overall performance.

damn
I forgot to finish the tasks that one event and missed out on one liberator

we need more BR1 rewards and BP weapons

>>537814314
I wanna try the Berdan, and the OP 20-round Mauser Mkb

I like the UD M42 but I don't want to pay for the UD M42

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9biXcX6IZ8

guys Me Adminral Starks just referred to the Eva troon as "him" xD

That freak isn’t even worth discussing

can't enlisted get a good content creator
surely one of the namefags knows how to edit a video

>YOOOO WHATSUPGUYS ITS YOUR BOY HUXBOX BACK AGAIN WITH ANOTHER ENLISTED VIDEO
>*2 minute intro
>TODAY WE'RE GONNA BE PLAYING AS BR2 GERMANY
>AS YOU CAN SEE I'VE GOT A 10 SQUAD LOADOUT HERE WITH PERFECTLY ROLLED SOLDIERS AND META WEAPONS
>I'M GONNA FIND THE NOOBIEST NOOBS TO SWEAT ON
>SIT BACK AND RELAX AND ENJOY THE SHOW

do me now do me now!

>*video opens with blue-haired vtuber character in the corner of the screen*
>heeeeeeeeey senpaitachi its lolispats here :3
>i'm gonna be playing as Japan today! yay!
>ugghhh they got nerfed again
>oh well imma do my best!
>thanks for liking and subscribing guys!

File: 2020-09-15_29.jpg (141 KB, 1000x625)

141 KB JPG

>>537764361
Heh.

>>537824418
we don't talk about the academy anon

File: 1729570489402370.jpg (71 KB, 1280x720)

71 KB JPG

>>537820725
>>537822106
>>537822848
thanks for being so brave in showing your mental illness just to bump a dead general

>>537822848
I've never believed japan was nerfed at any point honestly

File: 1744837302625585.gif (6 KB, 500x500)

6 KB GIF

>>537815840
>fat white faggot
>speaks like a dudebro nigger

>>537820725
I look like this and say this but I haven't been playing BR II lately. Mostly I and III.

Man people get really fucking mad when you use the Sniper Enfield. It just sets them off. Understandable since it's the only decent sniper in the game, but still. I had someone call artillery on my position instead of using it to defend the cap.

>>537835183
It’s really fun when the game isn’t dependent upon me and I can melee grey zone snipers to death with guerillas and take their guns

>>537837406
Oh fuck that reminds me, in a match I lost, a guy came over the hill trying to knife me and got blasted by my squad just before he reached me. I could hear his knife and everything. I will see if I can find it.

File: 1741102335303092.webm (2.99 MB, 1280x720)

2.99 MB WEBM

>>537837406
>>537837994
Got it. It's crazy to me that my bots swung around and shot him when he was crawling with a knife out.

>>537838771
I thought the knife was silent how did he get detected? is there a bot pov?

File: 1749296732492117.webm (2.82 MB, 1152x648)

2.82 MB WEBM

Iron Cross Legion "Deal".

>Orita
Good. Low-recoil gun with comical mobility so you can turn them into super fast assaulters that can place a rally point in the most ideal positions extremely early.

>M/28
REALLY good holy fuck. Easily one of the best BR I bolt actions, if not THE best. All the damage of a Mosin (the only good thing about them) with better accuracy, better sights, and a better rate of fire.

>Panzer III M
Absolute assfucker at BR II. Effectively has the armour of a KV-1 with a decent gun for anti-infantry that is also good against tanks while being nearly undeadable if you just angle your hull.

>G41 (Sniper) squad
Effectively unusable. Absolute pile of shit.

They could have made it any other squad and I would be tempted, but... nope. I don't want that piece of shit. Really sucks. They coulda put basically any other squad in there and I would have genuinely considered dropping 60 bucks, but the Sniper G41 is just SO bad. Semi-auto snipers are arguably the single worst class of primary weapon in the game, and the G41 is the worst of the semi-autos.

>>537849204
The bot happened to be facing the right direction at the right time, but it seems to turn around and kind of face his direction a solid 10 seconds before he crests the hill, then it snaps to him and freaks out for a little bit about a second after he climbs over. I genuinely think the bot "heard" him before it saw him, despite his crouching.

File: 1741691263887304.jpg (2.73 MB, 1920x1080)

2.73 MB JPG

>>537849986
>>537849204
Watching it back from the bot perspectives, all the bots besides the Engineer bot kinda snap around to watch that direction at the same time, 10 seconds before he appeared, meaning they heard him from VERY far away.

File: mlg.webm (3.94 MB, 720x406)

3.94 MB WEBM

>>537849986
I love the spastic quadruple take. AI truly is the future.

they really need to stop bots from aimbotting you through the foliage. bastogne is such cancer to play because bots constantly fucking beaming you through the bushes

>>537855448
They already made foliage have SOME effect. Bots used to snipe you from 400 meters away on The Pacific.

>Take a shot at a downed guy with my Liberator
>Like 10 meters away
>Bullet flies off and misses him
>Finish him off by swapping to and reloading my primary
Well, okay.

Maus

sex with comet

>>537855448
Which map is bastogne? Mountain pass and dominant height clearly aren't

File: file.png (450 KB, 1249x419)

450 KB PNG

>>537766763
Major have played just 2 matches of Enlisted last month. He has no time for old busted and out of fashion games like Enlisted. Little Timmy should preorder one of those packs.

>>537792554
>How do the four 30mm cannons work? Do they shoot HE like the Fw 190's?
They are identical to me262 but with over less ammo in reserves. There are zero reason to pick it over me262

>>537878116
The CM doesn't decide when news gets posted dumbass

>>537878225
Well the 262 has 4 on the nose, this has four far more spread out cannons so you get some really good ground coverage with it on a strafe. It’s obviously not better that’s why it’s a full BR lower.

https://enlisted.net/en/news/show/953--en/#!/

>>537881286
I hope this isn't all.

>>537881286
>>537882046
>Silver chests getting BP gear
Fucking wew. Can't wait to get a huge pile of De Lisle.

>>537882046
I wasn’t expecting a huge update now, they save the big stuff for December.
>>537882282
I like how they act like it’s a better deal putting more weapons in at the same drop rate when now the weapon pool is going to be even more bloated with crap.

>>537882475
The pool is going to have BP skins for reserve vehicles and BP soldiers too. You will be able to trade your BP soldiers for silver too, but I dunno why anyone would do that. I'd trade some of my garbage hero soldiers from Twitch drops.

>>537882619
I think they meant sell the old BP soldiers so you can earn them again with max stats from the box. I might as well do that. Going to do it one at a time so I can get the riflemen first though.
Do we have a list of what soldiers are from Twitch drops so I know to hang on to them? Off the top of my head there is the Jap MG Onoda that surrendered 30 years later and the Enemy at the Gates snipers.

>>537882282
9 man delisle troopers at BR1 would be lots of fun

>>537881286
>Japan attacker
Thank fucking God. I do not care in the slightest that it gets 2x60kg if it means I can even somewhat contest the air when the fighter slot is filled by a worthless idiot

>>537881286
Where Manchuria?

>>537886495
On the back burner like all the other shit the retards in this general believed would be surprise added

>>537824418
I wish I had a video showcasing those old mechanics. I need to see the weapon gacha again

>>537855448
>Interaction with vegetation was reworked too: bushes will no longer block shells and bullets, while the canopy of trees and bushes will have a greater impact on the AI soldiers’ vision.
Your word is law, anon

File: file.png (109 KB, 545x280)

109 KB PNG

>>537886495
Mark it on your calendar. December 15th 2025

File: 1742589695499919.jpg (91 KB, 450x600)

91 KB JPG

>>537890661
>just like they said ai would follow orders better
>just like they said ai will be better at pathing
>just like they said ai would not get in your way while building
more potato nigger lies

>>537881286
>Churchill 7
neat

>>537881286
>Japan finally get an attacker
>It's a fast ground-attack plane not a medium bomber
>Probably BR4 or 5
REEEEEEEEEEE!

File: Hiducky_Tojo.jpg (76 KB, 784x810)

76 KB JPG

>Will be able to loot 30 Arisaka mortars from the silver boxes

>>537904136
Yeah, right after I get my 30th Stinger and Conders

>>537904136
>>537905954
you'll put 1 million in and get a mosin with scope held on with tape, a bloodied STG, 2 blued borwnings and a katana

File: 1717435994897499.jpg (261 KB, 817x1069)

261 KB JPG

>>537881286
>the annoying bug that made Japanese soldiers bald and spoiled the general feel of the game has been fixed.

>>537907160
wish they'd fix the bug that made me bald and spoiled the general feel of existence haha

>>537908043
Oof

File: 1717743388501673.jpg (457 KB, 672x1707)

457 KB JPG

>>537908043

I bet you I will get something utterly dogshit like the Commission rifle

File: 0711b992aeef69d7ea2ff17a3(...).jpg (1.11 MB, 2560x1440)

1.11 MB JPG

>Reworking old locations: The cave village of Tunisia
https://forum.enlisted.net/en/t/reworking-old-locations-the-cave-village-of-tunisia/168598

>>537919336
Looks much better