/vp/ - It's Grenover - Pokémon

Anonymous

09/13/25(Sat)22:44:28 No.58250275

File: 2025-09-13 23.40.19 www.y(...).jpg (40 KB, 781x488)

40 KB JPG

Anonymous 09/13/25(Sat)22:44:28 No.58250275 Archived

It's Grenover

Anonymous
09/13/25(Sat)22:45:36 No.58250279

Anonymous 09/13/25(Sat)22:45:36 No.58250279

File: 1733270882852777.png (35 KB, 450x449)

35 KB PNG

oh another twigger thread about megas

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)00:13:14 No.58250518

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)00:13:14 No.58250518

>>58250275
Oh how the tables have turned.
From being the most popular one, crushing the other two in polls prior, to being the least popular one with the other two vastly ahead of them this time. Greninja has fallen.

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)00:32:49 No.58250561

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)00:32:49 No.58250561

>>58250275
Fucking Kek, not like this Greniggas

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)00:32:59 No.58250562

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)00:32:59 No.58250562

File: frogpost 25.jpg (90 KB, 961x830)

90 KB JPG

>let's just take regular greninja, make it fly upside down and give it a worse color scheme

What were they thinking?

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)00:38:05 No.58250581

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)00:38:05 No.58250581

>>58250275
Should have brought back the real Mega Greninja instead of the ugly upside down faker

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)00:39:56 No.58250589

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)00:39:56 No.58250589

>>58250581
Based

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)00:40:31 No.58250591

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)00:40:31 No.58250591

>>58250275
Mega Greninja is boring and uninspired

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)00:53:26 No.58250614

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)00:53:26 No.58250614

I wonder what would’ve happened if these 3 were released back in 2013. Would Chesnaught be more popular than it is now? Would Greninja be less popular?

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)02:07:31 No.58250789

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)02:07:31 No.58250789

>It's Grenover
~~Good.~~ The frog was overrated, anyway.

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)03:09:23 No.58250908

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)03:09:23 No.58250908

File: twitter trash.webm (1.72 MB, 696x522)

1.72 MB WEBM

>>58250275