I think that Conkeldurr is cool.
>>58270977Shitmon
>>58270991More like cool as shit, mon.
>>58270977Good of you. If there's one thing that bothers me about it and its pre-evos is that they constantly have to be portrayed with their respective objects like they're an integral part of their body (which would be absurdly retarded). Otherwise, I don't feel particularly anything about them, positive or negative.
>>58270977one of the ugliest pokemonbut OP is gay who into bara cringe
>>58270977Should get a mega that looks like Moses where he beats his opponent over with the Ten Commandments
>>58270996I think that's a valid peeve for Timburr and Gurdurr. Conkeldurr, though, not only seems to need the concrete pillars to support its upper body but also has Pokedex lore that justifies it. It's super smart and knows how to make concrete. Taught it to humans like a noble, blue collar Prometheus.
>>58271020>>58270996Also worth notingIn SV Conkeldurr has a cute sleeping animation. He holds on to one pillar while the other just stands straight up on the ground. It looks like an ingrained instinct to hold them.
>Ogre with exposed muscle fibers that swings around huge concrete pillars as weapons>"I don't like it because it's ugly."
>>58271413no squeeze fluffy fox :(
>>58272984Look at its face, it loves it.
>>58270977I Conk-ur.
Before I ever heard anyone else says its name I used to pronounce it like>Conkle-durrAnd still do because it's fun to say.
>>58270977It's the ugliest gen 5 pokémon.
>>58275250Monsters are supposed to be ugly.
>>58275260>Monsters are supposed to be ugly.? NTA but that's retarded
>>58275331Explain.
>>58270977
>>58276302A lot of creatures that are referred to as "monsters" in countless fictional settings are cute, cool, or beautiful. Are you trying to say that all those settings (including Pokémon) are wrong for calling their fantasy creatures "monsters" because according to you, monsters are supposed to be ugly even though the word "monster" has different meanings depending on the context?
>>58276407
>>58270994Is he punching the Moon?
>>58276423So your answer to my question is "yes", I take it?
>>58276407yea
He deserves a mega. Here's my proposal. >Mega Conkeldurr>Fighting/Rock>HP - 105>Attack - 496>Defense - 1>Special Attack - 1>Special Defense - 1>Speed - 1>New Ability - Holy Shit That Fucking Hurts>The user's moves harm the opponent in real life
>>58270998>>58277157Pee-eeeeeeeew! Your ideas are cringe!
Conkeldurr's my favorite Pokemon and I don't think it should ever get a mega because Gamefreak would fuck it up by not giving it Guts so it would just do less damage
>>58276351kinda creepy
>>58276407NTA, but why be mad when a monster is ugly? A lot of fictional monsters, especially yokais(which Pokemon takes alot of inspiration from), have been displayed as ugly or unsettling creatures. Sure, there can be cute, cool, or beautiful ones but pretending that intentionally ugly monsters can't exist is just weird to me.
I remember being so excited seeing it for the first time in BW only to learn that it was a trade evo. And during that time, people in my school were not playing Pokemon.
>>58278321There're ugly :) like Gyarados and MagmortarAnd ugly :( like Enamorus or Conkelshit.
>>58278340Gyarados isn't ugly. Just scary. Also, Magmortar is hated for ruining Magmar.
>>58278340Conkeldurr is :D ugly. Love the smug, tired-looking expression with the dark circles around the eyes. Love the exposed muscle chords. Love the big, heavy arms and hunched posture that actually make it look cartoonishly strong. Kinda surprised you like Magmortar, I like that thing a lot too.
>>58278345>Magmortar is hated for ruining Magmar.Not by me. No one else's opinion matters.
>>58278345Like Magmar wasn't ugly as sin already.
>>58278345>Gyarados isn't ugly, just scaryIt's both, dummy.
>>58278321>but pretending that intentionally ugly monsters can't exist is just weird to me.The other anon claimed that monsters were "supposed to be ugly", and I replied that monsters could be portrayed as cute, cool, or beautiful. I literally never said that ugly monsters couldn't also exist. Why are you putting words in my mouth?
>>58278523>I replied that monsters could be portrayed as cute, cool, or beautifulThey can be. But they're supposed to be ugly. If I say someone looks like a monster am I calling them pretty?
>>58278559So your answer to that question >>58276407 is also yes?
>>58278577Yes, everyone in the world is wrong except for me. Literally every monster design in the world requires my approval and if it doesn't have it then the design is objectively incorrect.
>>58270977based
Blud be likehttps://youtu.be/IMkFHZ_XLkk
>>58277259Thou Shall Not Shitpost
>>58277270Conkeldurr being shorter than Hilbert doesn't feel right...
>>58271102>a bloated veiny man with a tumor on it's head that needs to lug around two giant propsnah this thing sucks
>>58283707>A muscular ogre with exposed muscle fibers who gets to swing around two giant weapons he madeNah, this thing rules.
Conkeldurr is cute. CUTE!
Conkeldurr-adjacent but Gurdurr is firmly in my top 20 mons and I can’t articulate why
>>58285571Eviolite is suck a blessing for people who can't get trade evolutions. Gurdy's one of the better users too.
>>58278349Based
>>58270977I like to bring it in multis battles with friends. max sp.d and HP with a flame orb and one bulk up with drain punch makes it nigh unkillable
>>58270977>what if we made machamp but hideous and from unova. The worst gen of all time!
>>58288341your bump is much appreciated, shartranny
>>58288561zero sugar or not all that energy drink can't be healthy
>>58288561>>58276347Best image genre
>>58288341Dwebble > ParasHitmons > Sawk/ThrohZubat > WoobatTympole > PoliwagAudino = ChanseyRoggenrola = GeodudeTimburr > Machop
>>58289880that's lethal...
>>58289862Lemme tell you, if you want to get yoked, your average 1 serving of preworkout is on par with two monsters (or one bang/reign)
>>58270996to be fair mons have been portrayed that way since the very beginning in gen 1
>>58274039That's how I say it, too. It's not like it's intrinsically an incorrect pronunciation; there's no rules that would specify where the stress falls in a word structured like "Conkeldurr", so it's fine.
ZONKELDURR
