[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>all three get dragon type mega evolutions
>all three megas are complete dogshit with awful abilities
Truly the perfect trio
>>
>>58287640
>boosting sweeper with tough claws is bad
Post elo
>>
File: MegaDragons.png (3.9 MB, 2124x2330)
3.9 MB
3.9 MB PNG
>>58287640
Can we redo the water one?
>>
>>58287667
why would anyone ever use charizard x instead of y?
>>58287674
>implying christmas tree sceptile ever looked good
orabortions trying to rewrite history will always be funny
>>
>>58287702
>why would anyone ever use charizard x instead of y?

One is a physical attacking sweeper, the other is a special attacking nuke

They fulfill different roles
>>
git gud lmao
stop sucking smogonog cock
>>
>>58287702
>he doesn't like Christmas
Sad.
>>
>>58287707
>this
>a physical attacking sweeper
In a post gen 8 world, it’s a smfa that can’t hold a item
>>
>>58287712
t.copping feraligatard
>>
>>58287717
i unironically think moving 20 points from special attack to speed would make it slightly better
>>
>>58287717
The Attack is misleading because of Tough Claw's 30% boost to contact moves. So, basically every physical move it might run except Earthquake.
>>
>>58287950
Yeah, Mega Zard X mathematically has the equivalent of ~184 base attack when fully invested.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.