Is Gamefreak even trying? Digimon is reaching soul levels not seen since the early 2000’shttps://youtu.be/iog8eM9JBv8?si=fDyVtP5-4EZIUcBz
why are digisharts so obsessed with /vp/ lately
>>58397513>Is Gamefreak even trying?apparently, since you need to keep coming here to shill your dead series
>>58397513>Digimon: Soul>Pokemon: SlopCrazy, how things change so quickly.
>>58397541inferiority complex
>>58397541Superiority facts
>>58397513>digitranny threaddilate cringe faggot
>>58397541>Pokemon has a board for itself despite the franchise being liquid dogshit now>Hurr why do people think about us?
>>58397513Pokemon is popular and can coast off that while digimon needs to make really good games to sell well. I know it's impossible, but I hope a pokemon crash happens someday so we can get even better pokemon games, or that digimon becomes super popular so there's competition between it and pokemon, competition is almost always good for the consumer
>>58397610>I hope a pokemon crash happens somedayNah, too many stockholm apologists sucking this dead ass franchise. I have been sincerely dissasiocated with it since SwSh
>>58397541they feel smugpokemon still outsells them anyways
>>58397541seething jealousycase in point >>58397603
>>58397541We will be taking over soon
>>58397541Because mods don't have spine to rename it to /mon/
>>58397513looks like generic slop for teenage boys
>>58397714The picture doesn't even make sense. Skullseadramon is another Digimon, not a form. Retard.
>>58397546>New game getting critical acclaim >New anime that people are invested in>Meanwhile the Gamefreak Defense Force is trying to convince themselves Mega Totodile is good
>>58397541Have you learned to argue better this time?
>>58397806Left looks like generic slop for young girls
>>58397868>>>58397546(You)>New game getting critical acclaim >New anime that people are invested in>yet I still need to come to the pokemon board and screech for attention because I'm jealous the successful franchise is getting a new toy
>>58397850Nta but wasn't it a new digivolution?
>>58397806it even has naked women to turn them into gooners>>58397868>New game getting critical acclaim>flops anywayslol...
>>58397868>*flops*LMAO!!
>>58397937>Brags about getting a new toy ignoring that the toy is a piece of shit
>>58397941Yes. A new Digimon. Not a form. ShineGreymon Burst Form or Sistermon Awakened are new forms for a Digimon. SkullSeadramon is a different creature.
>>58397987>Source: I made it up
>>58397987
>>58398023So does Seadramon not Digivolve to it?
>>58398053>off model fan artwoah
>>58398020>I-I-IT'S SHIT!!!!! THAT'S WHY I CAN ONLY BRING UP MY APPARENTLY GOOD GAME IN COMPARISON TO THE APPARENTLY SHIT GAME!!! I'M DEFINITELY NOT A SEETHING JEALOUS RETARDkek
>>58397513Ok that was KINO
>>58398088>He thinks you have to be a fan of one or the other
>>58397541small dog syndrome
>>58398105Why would I be a fan of digishit?
>>58397541>>58397546He's a pokefag. Digifags don't care about Pokemon at all.
>>58397541>latelyHas been the case since Digimon came out. Mentally, digifags are still at the schoolyard justifying why they like the less popular thing.>>58397513> since the early 2000’sSo you admit that at least the last 25 years were shit?
>>58398125>Digifags don't care about Pokemon at allThey care more about Pokemon than digimon.
>>58398126Yes, game releases were few and far between. Anime was struggling because of focused too much on nostalgia. This is the first time in a long time Digimon actually has momentum.
>>58398074Does Growlithe evolving into Arcanine mean they're the same creature?
>>58398150>This is the first time in a long time Digimon actually has momentum.You say this every time Bandai doesn't make the most retarded move possible.
>>58398169No one has said that about Digimon since Tamers.
>>58398191>Vital Bracelet>Ghost Game>Cyber Slut>the current tcgAnd you were also hyping up when the dexcut was announced though that one wasn't Bandai's move.Guess in a few years you will say you never hyped TS.
>>58398215No one said Digimon had momentum after Cyber Sleuth, they said it’s an alternative that actually tries. No one watched Ghost Game or used the Vital Bracelet.
>>58398085Yeah. Aren't furries just great additions to a franchise?>>58398151Shut the fuck up. I know how Digivolution works, I asked a simple question. So does it Digivolve from Seadramon or not?
>>58398250Everybody said Digimon had momentum after Cyber Sleuth stop coping.
>>58398125It's just the one guy constantly seething itt pretending to be different anons over Digimon
>>58398250I wanted to try the vital bracelet myself. Haven't Pokémon now started switching to tamagotchi-like things again now?
>>58398284No one said that because there was nothing else on the horizon for Digimon, compared to now where there’s a game and anime people actually care about.
>>58398302
>>58398327Yeah. That. Similar to a Tamagotchi
>>58398250> No one watched Ghost Game or used the Vital Bracelet.Either you're coping or you aren't actually part of the digimon fanbase.>>58398302Bandai released some with the pokemon license, same as they did with other brands they own.It basically the ultimate cucking to digimon but digifags are unable to criticize bandai.
>>58398305>now where there’s a game and anime people actually care about>We're totally turning things around this time guise!!!
>>58398360But does it actually state that Bandai released it? I know they have worked with Pokémon in the past. No one is complaining that they work together
>>58398360okayall 5 fans watched ghost gamebig difference
>>58398360>Pokemon fan thinks you have to consume every piece of media related to a franchise or you aren’t a real fan
>>58398263>So does it Digivolve from Seadramon or not?nta but yes, it can evolve from Seadramon.
>>58398390>But does it actually state that Bandai released it? >https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Eevee_%C3%97_Tamagotchi>No one is complaining that they work togetherThere's "working together" and "using Digimon's already neglected main product for literally pokemon". You don't complain because you're bigger cucks than us.>>58398412I didn't say that. Guess digifags also have worse reading comprehension.
>>58398432Thank you
>>58398436>CopeJust because if it were the other way around, Pokémon would be suing
>>58398466Digimon has had video games for almost 20 years and nothing happened.
>>58398519I'm not sure what you're implying here
>>58397513Gamefreak could put litteral shit in a box as long as the shit looks like Pikachu they would sell 2 millions copy. They don't need to try.
>>58398436>No one watched Ghost Game>you’re not a real fan>I didn’t say thatSorry you made liking Pokemon your only personality trait and take personal offense when people don’t like the direction the series has been going
>>58398540That Digimon released video games(pokemon's main product) and pokemon didn't sue.Learn to read.
>>58398582That means absolutely nothing since they didn't even work together unlike with the Tamagotchi. God you're dumb
>>58398519>Digimon games come out with zero fanfare, mediocre at best, anime spends years relying on nostalgia, series falls out of favor>Suddenly new anime and game get released,Bandai starts marketing >anon thinks this is the same
>>58398606>Source: the voices in my head because Digimon lives rent free in there
>>58398579>No one watched Ghost GameYou said that. I didn't.I don't like the current state of pokemon either, but saying digimon has ever been close to pokemon's is delusional.>>58398605You're the one who posited the opposite situation anon. Don't blame me for your mistakes.>>58398606There's no reason to think this hype cycle will be different to the other hype cycles.The previous digimon anime also got marketing. Heck, the criticism to GG was that it was cancelled DESPITE selling well.
>>58398663Technically, either one of them could have sued from using each others brand. But they worked together instead - what does that imply?The two franchises have a beneficial relationship. Get your head out your ass and seek help.
>>58398663> saying digimon has ever been close to pokemon's is delusionalNo one said that you schizo
>>58398675>Technically, either one of them could have sued from using each others brand.Then your posit is even more retarded than i thought. >>58398689>>58397513
>>58398712How so? You're literally saying that Digimon are retarded for not suing in the first place. Are you okay?
>>58397610this is why I'm rooting for palworld and time stranger. Nintendo needs a serious kick in the ass and a dual pronged attack from both digimon and palworld might actually force them to give the slightest fuck. Pokemon losing in this scenario is a good thing. Every real pokemon fan who actually cares about the franchise should be skipping Z-A and buying digimon right now.
>>58398728>How so?Using a media license without consent is out of the question, even for GF.>You're literally saying that Digimon are retarded for not suing in the first placeNever said that. Learn to read.
>>58398796See>>58398360Is implying that here. I see you still haven't learned to form your arguments any better lmao.And where does it say anywhere it was used out of consent? They literally worked together fucktard
>>58398741You said the same thing during Cyber Sleuth.
>it's that one same thirdworlder itt reeeeing once again about Digimon
>>58398741Pokefags will never realize this. Having actual competition and actually having to try only benefits the Pokemon fanbase, but they don't want that, they just want slop and meme megas.
>>58398826>Is implying that hereNot really. At all. I didn't even criticize Bandai on that post.>And where does it say anywhere it was used out of consent? I literally never said the eevee tamagotchi were made without consent. Learn to read.In >>58398466 you posit the opposite scenario to pokemon-based tamagotchi. I, being reasonable, assumed you meant a digimon-based video game.Then, in >>58398605 it turns out that what you meant by "reverse scenario" you meant them being released without pokemon's consent, which is what we've been discussing since.
>>58398863NTA but I do want competition.Overhyping anything that looks like it wont help either side though.
>>58398863>Having actual competition and actually having to try only benefits the Pokemon fanbasePokemon has had competition from day you idiot, you think Pokemon is the only thing releasing on Nintendo devices?
>>58398871So what does>You don't complain because you're bigger cucks than usImply?I don't think you understand basic English, Mehmet. Please learn how to argue properly before you come seething here and picking shit out of nowhere
>>58398871>you posit the opposite scenario to pokemon-based tamagotchi. I, being reasonable, assumed you meant a digimon-based video game.Oh, I get it. You're retarded and just assumed. Okay
>>58397850The whole problem with digimon is that any digimon can be a form of any other digimon dependin on what a specific game/story requires. I'd definitely have become a digimon chad if their evolutions made any fucking sense.
>>58399093It's not a bug, it's a feature.>Verification is not required.
>>58398966What was the scenario then?> just assumedHalf this discussion was you outright putting words in my mouth.
>>58397785fucking this. Make this place a general monster franchise board already
>>58399357I'd rather that be an entirely new board.
>>58397785>>58399357Why would anyone want a /mon/ board? For more ragebait and shitposting between series?
>>58399357Just go to /trash/ seems like a good place for digimon discussion
>>58399397thisa /mon/ board would be that + discussions about whether X franchise belongs
>>58399399t. newfag mod
>>58399262How? When you implied in the first place that "Digitards are just cucks" (for letting Pokémon do a collab)
>>58399492Answer my question first.
>>58398215>>58398250>>58398406Ghost Game is the best Digimon series ever made, faggot.Beatbreak already feels inferior in comparison.
>>58398741it's not nintendo
>>58399597What scenario?
>>58399093Look at Tamagotchi for understanding it better
>>58399142"Plush so all the same" Digimon aah logic
>>58399093Pokemon fans can’t because if one form in the line is bad it’ll ruin the whole line and be a stain on their favorite forever
>>58397513Pokémon's had a ton of animated shorts like those though
>>58399397>Why would anyone want a /mon/ board? For more ragebait and shitposting between series?yes. More fun than the current state of this board. Pic related. It would also be fun to see the board become the central hub of monster franchise fandom bleedover
>>58399797Don't all monster franchises follow this mechanism though
>>58398053>off model slop
>>58399990Weird how Pokémon are now going down the furry bait route though amirite?
>>58399623I'm the first comment and I never said its bad, but it was hyped when the tide was high.Also, while I loved the bulk of it, it does trainwreck near the end, even if it wasn't the writers's fault but bandai bandaing.And I don't like Beatbreak as much as some folks do but it itsn't bad either so far. I don't like most digimon designs there though.>>58399758The one implied in >>58398466
>>58400297I genuinely don't know what you're asking me anymore anon
>>58400311Learn to read then.What's the scenario posited in >>58398466?
>>58399691if it isn't nintendo why are they sueing palworld instead of bitching at gamefreak to do better?
>>58400328The scenario is that TPC would sue if it were any other way and everyone knows it (if they were so assblasted about it that is, and if things were not mutually agreed upon)What is it you're not getting ?
>>58400328>posited
>>58400374> if things were not mutually agreed uponSo, what I meant in >>58398871, gotcha.
>>58400372those cheap games sell 20 million copiesthey will let gamefreak sell trash as long as it sells
>>58400395No, you're backtracking on whatever gibberish you were trying to come out with in hopes you didn't eventually contradict yourself. You didn't say that anywhere initially. God I literally lose braincells talking to you
>>58399797>aahIt's "ahh", retard.
>>58400465>You didn't say that anywhere initiallyI literally quoted the post where I did nigga. And stop accusing me of coming up with gibberish when you keep making up what my points are supposed to be.Seriously, learn to fucking read.
>>58399806In case of digimon your favourite can just evolve into Sukamon at any time.
>>58400492>niggaI get it now anon.Like literally for the sake of humanity, I hope you never have to face with a difficult decision in your life because you will get yourself killed and others in the process
>>58400670*To be faced
>>58400605Litteraly a skill issue
>>58400670seethe and learn to read.
>>58400605yes, with negligence. You literally need to deny your digimon a bathroom until it's forced to live in its own shit for this to happen, anon. It's easily avoidable with care but if this accidentally happens, Sukamon is given good evolutions to incentivize players to not give up on their virtual pet. As a side note, with the amount of real world animal abusers I've met who think it's okay for their pets to live in their own shit, I'm happy a virtual pet franchise is trying to raise kids to not be these asshole adults
>>58400605not in the rpgs like time stranger and cyber sleuth
>>58400836>with the amount of real world animal abusers I've met who think it's okay for their pets to live in their own shit, I'm happy a virtual pet franchise is trying to raise kids to not be these asshole adults
>>58400739Where did you imply in your argument >>58398871 about ANYTHING being USED without any of either of the franchises consent?Go the fuck back to school. Oh and, you have to be 18 to post here too anon
>>58400941>you meant them being released without pokemon's consentIts near the end.
>>58400999You just state in there >I literally never said the eevee tamagotchi were made without consentDo you even know what it is you're even arguing about?
>>58401123The post has more text in it, I greentexted the part you asked for. Learn to read and then you'll know what I'm arguing about.
>>58401155So no, you don't. Understood
>>58401187I do know what I'm arguing, you just can't read. Learn to do so and you'll have no problem.
>>58401202Strangely you never answered my question though>>58399492
>>58401202Tell me what your initial argument even was in the first place
>>58401213Because your "answer" for mine was just confirming what I already said.As for the answer, here you go. This are the times in the reply chain where you put words in my mouth. And that's assuming you ONLY replied in this chain and not the other times this happened ITT.>>58400465>>58399492>>58398826>>58398728>>58401225That'd mean using text and if that worked, you'd know that already.
>>58401270You didn't imply anywhere, at anytime that anything is being used without consent. Initially, your argument was that Digimon are cucks for allowing TPC to do a collab - which is a load of shite because if they were even on bad terms they wouldn't collab.Go back over your "argument". Where did you say "oh if they didn't both agree to collab" - you didn't, nor imply it. I think it's you who needs to learn how to read.You're just blabbering on about x scenario and reverse scenario. That implies nothing.
>>58401270>What is a bias in an argument anon?Who is the one who initially started this by calling Digimon "cucks" for a collab with Pokémon?I'm not putting words in your mouth either. It's what you're arguing about and implying
>>58401306>You didn't imply anywhere, at anytime that anything is being used without consent.Exactly? I assumed you did and then you confirmed, in >>58400465 that I was correct.>Initially, your argument was that Digimon are cucks for allowing TPC to do a collab -I said Digifags are for not minding that, not bandai.>Go back over your "argument". Where did you say "oh if they didn't both agree to collab" - you didn'tAgain, you're the one that brought up that scenario. I wasn't even considering the notion that bandai would release a pokemon product without authorization.>You're just blabbering on about x scenario and reverse scenario. That implies nothing.Anon, >>58398466, that was you.If indulging in hypotheticals is hard for you then you shouldn't have brought them up in the first place.>>58401335>Who is the one who initially started this by calling Digimon "cucks" for a collab with Pokémon?I said digifags are, and of course such a post has bias in it. You aren't discovering fire precisely. Its like positing that one of the largest media conglomerates in the world might use one of the biggest IPs ever without the license, its absurd.>I'm not putting words in your mouth either. Yes, you did. Maybe not on purpose but of lack of reading comprehension but that's your problem.
>>58401366You literally say the x scenario crap right here>>58398871
>>58401366You don't know how to even spell properly let alone argue. Good luck
>>58401366>I said Digifags are for not minding that, not bandai.Why is that an issue? You the one with a retarded hate boner for no reason
>>58401366>I-if I write a wall of text instead maybe I'll sound smart
>>58401396>You literally say the x scenario crap right hereAfter you brought it up nigger. If you didn't want to discuss that scenario, don't bring it up.>>58401406Illuminate me then, what was I wrong about?>>58401422>Why is that an issue? The actual main issue is that Bandai neglected Digimon's main product and novel concept in favor of toy anime, rpgs and gachas. I mentioned the Eevee one because it was already brought up but they also released Ultraman and Kamen Rider VBs and eventually had the VB tied to a completely different brand in the show that suceeded Ghost Game.If you liked digimon, you wouldn't like that. Its basically the dexcut x100000.>>58401443Yeah, I forgot you struggle reading more than a sentence.
>>58400853Yeah, because it's the game dev arbitrarily deciding what your favourite will be able to evolve into this time.
>>58400836I don't mind a condition-based branching evolution tree, as long as it's consistent. In case of digimon it isn't. It could've been such a great franchise.
>Makes me agree instead that we both came to an agreement here >>58400395 when It's not even possible for the franchises to collab if they were on said "bad terms">He still didn't state anywhere that either but claims he did
>>58401467Because it's fucking true, statistics are statistics. Palworld?I think you lose track of your own argument half way through and have to keep referring back to your own posts because you don't understand them either.You're here just to bait
>If I make up what my opponent said I can win any argument!!
>>58401540Yeah. Weird that >>58400395
>>58401539...when did I even question statistics?Are you ok anon?
>>58401556Exactly, need the greentext again?
>>58401557Never said you did RETARD. It's for my arguments sake fucking hell.Let's help you out a bit shall we anon?What does TPC suing Palworld mean? (I.e statistics)
>>58401575Yeah considering you made up that we both said the same thing, which we didn't
>>58401467If things were really that bad for le heckin Pokémon company they wouldn't agree to do a collab. Maybe you just need to touch some grass.
>>58401484not really
>>58401576>What does TPC suing Palworld mean? That's...not a statistic anon. But it means TPC thinks Palword infringed a patent or copyright.>>58401588Not really. Learn to read.>>58401601Right, big corporations are known to not want to increase profits.
>>58401613Which is part of said statistics, (I.E TPC would sue if the shoe were on the other foot)
>>58401613Go on then, please point it out in your post where we happened to say the same thing
>>58397513Wild how pokedrones defend this franchise past the 3DS era after the trillionth overpriced dated rushed yearly game and even engaging in wokeslop politics.
>>58398910>Mario Party is competition to Pokemon
>>58401613I'm not sure what you're arguing for anymore. You just make yourself look stupid by contradicting yourself.>It's so pathetic that Bandai and Pokémon collared! Shame on the Digitards for allowing this!>Umm actually sweaty big corporations are known to not want to increase profits
>>58401652the games are great!
>>58401659**Collabed
>>58401624Yes anon, if Bandai infringed on Pokemon's copyright, Pokemon would sue, you're a genius. Pokefags are cooked!!>>58401638You're the one insisting we're supposedly agreeing. I don't have to prove your points.>>58401659Those two statements don't contradict each other. Learn to read.
>>58401678When did they collab?
>>58401689The Tamagotchi Eevee is a Bandai collab
>>58401613>it means TPC thinks Palword infringed a patent or copyright.in a just and fair world maybe. The patents they're sueing them over are being written and rewritten while the lawsuit is happening. The goal is simply to kill a potential competitor in it's infancy.
>>58401695But that's not a Digimon thing.
>The very concept of Digimon made a schizo so angry he gibberished himself into a frenzy
>>58401685Then maybe next time try not to make yourself sound like a complete contradictive fucktard
Pokemon will never have this
>>58401705Yeah, but I'm arguing with a dude who thinks companys suing for copyright infringement at all is a big gotcha. He's not ready for the real world.>>58401725You say this but still don't bring up the contradiction.
>>58401695Tamagotchi is Bandai
>>58401685You said it yourself here >>58400395
>>58401740Sure. But that's not Digimon.I know Bandai have collab with Pokémon.Pokken and New Snap.But not with Digimon.
>>58401609Just look at the tamagotchis.
>>58401737The contradiction is in your argument. Suddenly it's okay that the company is trying to increase it's profits by collaborating. You may as well have not even bothered arguing in the first place
>>58401753Are you retarded?> what you meant by "reverse scenario" you meant them being released without pokemon's consent>you meant>youAs in "not me".Learn to read please.>>58401775> Suddenly it's okay that the company is trying to increase it's profits by collaborating.When did I say that's wrong? Quote please.
>>58401772https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamagotchi"Tamagotchi (Japanese: たまごっち; IPA: [tamaɡotꜜtɕi], "Egg Watch") is a brand of handheld digital pets marketed since 1996 by Japanese toymaker Bandai, a division of Bandai Namco Holdings."
>>58397541they've been like this since the 2000's. they have an inferiority complex being in Pokemon's shadow for more than 25 years.
>>58401654All games are competition to each other.
>>58401789I know. But no Pokémon have appeared in Digimon media, no collab.Tamagotchi collab isn't the same.
>>58401781Apparently we both came to some retarded agreement because you apparently "implied' what I said (although you didn't lmao)You're the one putting shit in my mouth>>58401781Please go take English in school again. You are terrible at making a convincing argument.
>>58401820No anon, Pokemon is not competing with Madden and Call of Duty, there is very little to no overlap in those markets
>>58401825So what is the Tamagotchi Eevee then ?
>>58401836>Apparently we both came to some retarded agreement Not really, that's just your delusion.>although you didn't lmaoThen, what did you mean in >>58398466>You are terrible at making a convincing argument.Says the guy who doesn't get the difference between "you" and "I".
You may have collabed with tamagotchi, but we collabed with godzilla.
>>58401869What did>>58400395Mean then?And I don't even know what you're even quoting in that second part
>>58401887>digimon!=tamagotchibiggest digimon "fan"
>>58401845Games cost money and they take time to beat, all games are fighting for your money and time.
digibros will do anything but buy the games/anime dvds of their franchise
>>58401899That you confirmed that, in>>58398466, you meant TPC suing Bandai for releasing unlicensed product.>And I don't even know what you're even quoting in that second partOf which post?In >>58401869 I'm quoting >>58401836In >>58400395 I'm quoting >>58400374they're both very direct replies.
>>58401902Digimon is made by Bandai. Are you okay?
>>58401936No that example is you being the one putting words in my mouth (the very thing you claim that I'm doing)
>>58401945Never said otherwise.>>58401945>you being the one putting words in my mouthOk then. What did you mean in >>58398466 then?
>>58401936What is pic related in relation to?
>>58401904>Anon thinks Pokemon is competing with GTA
>>58401989That's the truth as we have seen previously that TPC have used those measures in the past. What is difficult for you to understand?
>>58401989What did it even mean then anon?
>>58397513So it was Kamen Rider after all...Cool
>>58401989Sorry, second part meant for >>58401970>>58401991Its a screen cap of >>58401781, on which i refer to what my assumption about what anon(as in, not me, another anon) meant in >>58398466, which, according to >>58400374 seems to be a lack of consent between the two sides, but that anon keeps insisting that its not that.>>58402004YOu think outright using Eeeve, a copyrighted character from TPC is the same as the palworld shit?
>>58402045TPC have shown that previously they sue. What are you arguing about here?>seems to be a lack of consent between the two sides, but that anon keeps insisting that its not that.? I already said if it were that much of an issue they wouldn't collab.
>Can’t even follow this thread because schizo anon has ran himself into multiple different arguments with each post
>>58402045Sorry but statistics are statistics as they have shown
>>58401902It's more of a sister/brother relationship than a same property thing. It's like saying someone collabed with superman because they appeared in a batman comic.Though I guess if we take Nanimon as more than just an in-joke we can conclude that pokemon and digimon canonically share a multi-verse with themselves, tamagotchi, godzilla, medabots, hello kitty, one piece, monster hunter and Harry Potter.
How can Digimon cause this much seething and seemingly mind break one anon so badly?
>if these two companies didn't agree to make a collaboration then they wouldn't make a collaborationGreat argument there, how will pokefags ever recover.
>>58402130Sorry the truth mindbroke you this badly
>>58402118The digimon fanbase has more than one fan though, there's multiple mind broken people.
>>58397513I enjoy both franchises, but Digimon will always wipe the floor in the MONSTER design department. Best stuff GF ever does, are legendaries and when they did the Ultra Beasts. Everything else is too tame. It's especially gay how they apparently handicap themselves by tuning down the concepts they do make for monsters. I wish GF would grow a pair and do something bare minimum edgy again like Black&White 2.
>>58402114I'd at least say it's a spin off more than anything.I've also heard that Bandai did Pokémon figurines also previously
this thread in a nutshell
>>58402138Don't mind, it was a big reveal to me. Now i'm enlightened. Now that I know companies work together voluntarily(not to make profits obviously) its clear Digimon is the superior franchise and I will post daily threads about it on /vp/.
>>58402142No, there's just one third world Poketard itt always seething and reeing about Digimon until he becomes more and more inconsistent and falls into a schizo fit
>still can't point out the inconsistency
>>58402161**WorlderAlso makes these kinds of threads on purpose for baiting
>>58402159Good I'm glad you learned that franchises can be on mutual terms. Good for you
>>58402171Anon...no one knows what the fuck you're even sperging out about
>>58402192Then you can't say there's an inconsistency.
>>58402198Oh. You're still complaining about >>58401737Like I said. You can't really jump from one franchise looking bad and then suddenly it is okay for them to combine for profits sake. It makes your argument look weak on behalf of the franchise you're trying to make sound "superior" do you understand? I take it as English wasn't your strong subject. It sounds pretty contradictive in itself
>STILL doesn't answer >>58399492
>>58397513Digimon hasn’t had soul since Yasuda started doing character art.Digimon hasn’t had soul since Digimon Tamers.It’s just a more marketable Megami Tensei, given that it’s technology causing a supernatural incursion in Tokyo, and you’re collecting monsters to decide the destiny of earth… or at least Tokyo. It’s old. From the looks of it SMT5 is less tedious.I don’t see the comparison to pokemon in all seriousness, outside of brand recognition.>>58398023Don’t be pedantic. MetalGreymon, as a design, is an iteration on Greymon, as Greymon is capable of evolving into it. It’s a new “form” of Greymon. Same here. Even better: Black Frost is a form of Jack Frost. Frost Ace is a form of Jack Frost. Raiho is a form of Jack Frost.
>>58402274I never watched Tamers. Everyone said it went darker
>>58402229>You can't really jump from one franchise looking bad and then suddenly it is okay for them to combine for profits sake. You seem to have an issue differentiating between "the franchise" and its fans. They're two different things.On >>58398360 I criticized digimon fans, literally saying "digifags" and this has been clarified multiple times in this thread, mostly in >>58401467.There's no contradiction is you blaming by english but not knowing how to read.
>>58402294The only contradiction*
>>58402294Then go speak to TPC about it instead of looking like a fucking seething retard
>>58402294Regardless it makes your point look less strong and convincing.So please take that English lesson when you can
>>58402274>I don’t see the comparison to pokemon in all seriousness, outside of brand recognition.It's the name and that fact that it involves evolving monsters. Other than that they have zero in common. Even the monsters bit is iffy since the digimon are fully sapient beings that can talk.>>58402289It's good. I wouldn't classify it as dark but it does confront some dark themes.
>>58402376I grew up with Adventure and the second season
>>58402376>digimon are fully sapient beings that can talk.And so can Pokemon anon, but I assume everyone mashed a during N's explanation on how the Pokemon language works. Its a universal one.
>>58402607Normiefags still think Pokémon say their name like idiots.
>>58397583>Poketranny calling someone else a trannyShould i hand you your skirt sir?
>>58402156For the longest time, threads that opened with a positive opinion for Digimon would quickly get deleted. But now, in the era of ChatGPT, they turn into this.Considering what TPC has done with everything else that threatens the Pokémon brand, it would not surprise me if a portion of the budget goes to sabotaging Digimon. It would certainly explain the way Bandai treats the franchise.
>>58402953Plenty of tranny stuff to go around considering The MC is Aegiomon is twisted into Dan or Kanan.
>>58402901Anon they just growl or roar in every other media. Saying their names is arguably more advanced.
>>58403024Jupitermon looks like a robot
Mega Pokemon are pathetic
>>58403263Jupitermon is also obviously based on Zeus and has a crazy wife/mom in TS.
I fully expected Time Stranger to lean in to kiddie shonen censorship, but they proved me wrong when Bacchusmon killed himself right in front of me. That's peak SOVL. You'll never ever get an official game where an alcoholic Pokemon kills itself due to survivor's guilt.
>poketubers would rather talk about DIGImon than gamefreak's upcoming slopthis is the most dire state the franchise has ever been in since gen 5
>>58403425It'll die down, but it's nice to see people recognise quality over brand for once.
>>58403012I don't think TPC cares about Digimon. The two franchises have vastly different mechanics, aesthetics and target audiences. If they were that petty, they never would have allowed Bandai to make Pokemon products.It's why I also don't think you'll see Game Freak shit their pants at Time Stranger's success and try to poorly copy it like they did with Yo-kai Watch, because YKW actually was muscling in on Pokemon's target audience.
>>58397541New game is popular and brought new people to Digimon
