We are never getting a good Pokemon game again
>>58403835>again
>again
>>58403835We are getting one in two days :)
For context:
>>58403835goodpokespicjeet slop slurpers deserve shit
>>58405256>relative marketing cost that lowI forgot post-00's AAA games could still be that sensible and unbloated for some time, goddamn.
>>58403848Graphics aren't everything and Pokemon's GBA art style was simplistic-which is fine, though perhaps cheap feeling compared to the others.Unfortunately for Gamefreak, the Switch gets no excuse. They did not aim for simplicity there, and still completely flubbed it.
>>58406397Sadly, while clearly taking steps to improve it (I'm not invested in that shit, but some kids that are said the early L: Z-A shots were GOOD) they do still make a kid's series and understand running performance is more important to kids than detail so great you can see a pidgy take a shit form 20 miles away (which is why they hauled back on the level of detail in a game intended for Switch 1). I do think they're finally, what's the word you youngins use? oh yeah - "cooking" with Gen 10's development but also know graphical fidelity can be left out if performance dictates due to the mass market not actually finding that critical to their experience of the children's series game.
