[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1729446369291798.jpg (1.7 MB, 1529x2048)
1.7 MB
1.7 MB JPG
>Mega Dragonite
>Mega Tyranitar
>Mega Metagross
>Mega Garchomp (x2?)
>Paradox Hydreigon
>Hisuian Goodra
>Kommo-o's Kommonium Z
>Dragapult (cucked by Charizard)
>MEGA BAXCALIBUR

Why does Gamefreak dislike Dragapult SO MUCH? It has only been around for two generations, and it is already the MOST uninteresting, unattractive, shit pseudo-legendary PKMN even, lacking any gimmick and good move.
>>
>>58410212
Gimmick-free good!
>>
File: Spoiler Image (65 KB, 881x635)
65 KB
65 KB JPG
>>58410212
Dragapult will get a GMax for Legends Galar it'll fit even more since its set in the Middle Ages
>>
>>58410212
holy shit I didn't notice, Baxcalibur getting a mega in the same gen it debuts is insane. Dragapult is 6 year old and it can only use the gimmicks every a Magikarp can kek
>>
>>58410212
Now I don't want to hear "but [insert recent pokemon] is too recent to get a mega/form/anything!" ever again.
>>
>>58410258
Would be Based
>>
The thing about poles is that it's so min/maxed does it even need anything? Give it 2 more gens before it gets some kind of buff or call back

Also you forgot ttar and mence both have paradox forms
>>
>>58410212
He doesn't have a Gmax? LMAO They really did fuck him



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.