>>58411088
No one. I’m still mad at these fuck-ass designs.

YanMEGA could've been a bug dragon

>>58411088
I am kinda conflicted with the new megas. On one hand, most of them are either boring or mid as fuck, but on the other hand, under all the garbage, some gold can be found (Chesnaught, Drampa, Hawlucha) and some decent stuff as well.
There is a lot of pokemon who could benefit from a Mega (which includes the 3 you just cited). But I really don't want to risk the odds. And at the same time, I am kinda mad that they choose to give 3 megas to pokemon which already have one. There was a lot of cool choices in the speculation threads.
I am praying that Golisopod (which was a great contender for a mega), Tatsugiri and Baxcalibur get great megas.

>>58411088
I want Mega Charizard Z based on Chinese dragons plz with the ability Contrary

>>58411088
Luxray due to being fully evolved, other 2 can get evos

>>58411240
haxorus and flygon are both 3 stages </3 they cant get another evolution

>>58411269
>>58411240

I don’t anon is referring to these two, right?

I'm in agreement with >>58411219. Flygon (and a lot of others) could definitely use a buff of some kind, but I'm also relieved that it escaped the fate of receiving a potentially supermegachungagoofysilly mega. I understand why some Pokémon are getting a second mega (if those datamines are true) but I also can't help but think that those could have gone to something else.

>>58411088
it doesnt matter anyway because flygon is 100% getting a sandstorm oriented form in gen 10 regardless

>>58411088
i can't tell if i'm mad or relieved that the Galvantula rumor ended up untrue

>>58412084
>Galvantula
Man that was from the pre-XY datamine days. Some anon claimed to have “encountered a glitch” that gave him mega stones for Galvantula, Chandelure, and Druddigon.

>>58412729
No, there was a rumor from some Discord about 6 additional megas from the 26 already announced for ZA...Zeraora, Galvantula, and Turtonator and three additional mons