>haha fans will have no idea we are teasing Legends Galar for gen X, they will be so surprised!I almost feel bad for them
>>58425816I dont
>>58425816I don't.
>>58425816Why don't you dynamax some bitches instead?
>>58425832Anon the one on the left is a bitch already
>>58425816>the other NPC says they can visit the Battle Tower then>in Legends Galar there's no battle tower because the game is set fucking 1000 years ago
>>58425832dynamax vore...
>>58425816>we are now entering the gimmick slop recycle stageCool, nothing new forever
>>58425934
>>58425934it's just a tower made with big rocks, during the events of the games it will fall down and form Stonehenge
>>58425945Gen X also has the PokeJapan game, anon. Sinnoh, Kitakami, Kanto, Johto and Hoenn.
>>58425956that one got cancelled
>>58425816Kek. Fwiw there were an insane amount of Johto references in Arceus but they still changed it to Kalos, so who knows maybe they will change it again
>>58425945I called that back when megas were first announced for ZA. that they're going to just cycle between gimmicks endlessly from now on instead of making new ones. but nobody believed me
>>58425945To be fair they were planning a non gimmick Legends Johto first but then changed their mind. I think they just really wanted to try the pikmin gameplay style and thought dynamax and galar would really fit that idea.
>>58425961and now we know that Legends Johto was actually planned. Legends Galar looks a bit further along in development though, and as an entirely new game concept it would have more work put into it than Johto, which basically would have just been a rehash of Arceus (the reason they scrapped it). so I can't see them throwing that out. but yeah, it's possible.
>>58425964The gen 10 docs literally reference pokemon changing appearances based on the weather as a feature for the gen. Like if you want to argue that feature might not make the cut, or be severely limited from the pitch, but c'mon now.Or do you just consider that another variation of regional forms?
>>58425974I will always be mad they threw out Legends Johto. But I get that their vision for the series is trying a new type of RPG combat style each time. I hope one day they revisit the Legends Arceus style again for a Legends Johto
>>58425816They would know that these hints are obvious since they found out the were hacked in October 2024, and rule number 1 of a hack is assume everything's compromised
Knowing that the original plan was for a legends johto game in the past makes a whole lot more sense to me. I feel like the legends subtitle sort of implies a consistent past setting. What else is a legend but a story from the past that persists? Having the very next legends game immediately mismatch the subtitle and just be a standard present/sequel story to a modern game felt so weird to me from the very onset of ZA's reveal. Don't really have an issue with it existing but it feels like they should have called it something else in that case.
>>58425959Source? Other than your ass, of course
>>58425980I was referring specifically to the battle gimmick trend - megas, z-moves, dynamax, tera - I haven't seen all the details of what you're describing, but it sounds more like an aesthetic thing? so yeah probably something more like regional forms. but hey, if I'm wrong I'll eat my words.
>>58426002I agree but I think their vision for the series now is just telling a specific story that occured some time in the Pokemon world in a specific location. Whether in the past, present or future. On any scale, from the story of how people in 1800s Sinnoh learned to live with Pokemon, to how Lumiose City was developed in 2018 to the story of how people caught Pokemon in 1000s Galar
>>58426003Common sense
>>58426041Damn that's a weird name for your ass, dude
>>58426016>Battle gimmick>Aesthetic thingRetard
>>58426002yeah it's weird. I really liked PLA's in spite of its flaws and thought it was a promising direction, so I was initially optimistic about a new Legends game, but ZA seemed to toss out all the things I liked about it. and now Legends Galar is looking like a completely different thing to both of them too. so I guess the series is just a vessel to experiment and try out whatever new ideas they have. which is understandable, but it's also somewhat frustrating that the concepts introduced in these games don't get any opportunity to be developed and refined. especially when they feel so lacking. I mean, like I said I did enjoy PLA, but I can't deny it felt a bit like a tech demo sometimes. but I thought there was potential there, and now that potential's never going to be realized.
Would they realistically revisit Galar this soon?
>>58426071is there any reason to believe the weather forms thing is anything more than an aesthetic change? I'm seriously asking, I haven't seen that part of the leak. like I said, I'll eat my words if I'm wrong about it, it's just the way you described it doesn't really sound like it's a battle affecting gimmick.
>>58426090They don't care about the time passed, they're trying to experiment with gameplay styles and chose Galar because it fits the idea as >>58426078says
>>58426091What's your definition of aesthetic change? Because it mentions pokemon transforming into gas/liquids.Idk I guess grimer could become gaseous and still being a poison type.
>>58426090>this soonGalar game came out in 2019. WW comes out in 2026, the DLC in 2027 and then we don't know which comes first, the MMO in Japan or Legends Galar so, we aren't going back to UK until 2028 or 2029, a decade later.
>>58426118On the timeline it said Galar in 2028
>>58426118And also Galar was last the focus in 2020, so it would be an 8 year gap
>>58426121So from 2019 to 2028, almost a decade. We revisited Kanto faster back in gen 3.
>>58426140Completely different era, tech jumps were several orders faster.
>>58426114ok, well I guess it could be a battle gimmick then. guess we'll see.
>>58426147like >>58426099 said, I think they are choosing the setting based on what fits the concept of the game, not out of an obligation to revisit any particular region. Legends games aren't remakes. BW remakes were mentioned in the leaks although not in development, so that's something that's being considered separately to Legends. I think the fact that PLA aligned with the Sinnoh remakes gave people the impression that they would be connected going forward, but that's clearly not the case.
>>58426118>>58426121>>58426126That's of course assuming they don't contract ILCA to shit out a BW remake between last date noted in Teraleak and Champions' release naturally.
>>58425974More Arceus would have been good...
>>58425956We are going Indonesia thoughbeit doe
>>58426147And yet the difference between RG and FRLG will be nothing compared to betwen normal Galar and Legends. Legends Galar has you commanding 30 pokemon like a mini army ala Pikmin
>>58426210We are going to SEA, UK in Legends and Japan in an MMO all in gen X, retard, check the leaks
>>58426236>project proposals are TURTLEY troofs guise, honest!And I say once again, "Go ask the sinnohtoddlers how concept art for BDSP meant they got chibishit characters and the exact same game released in 2006 rebuilt line-for-line in unity".Concept /= shipped project. Shit ALWAYS changes.
>>58426245And we were getting XY2 in Gen 6, until Game Freak cancelled it to finish Gen 7 monkey. Plans change and I'd bet if anything starts going sideways, they'll bin it, bin it EARLY and get something else on the boil to release instead, doubly so when they know we know what they're planning.
>>58426182>project proposalsThey aren't just proposals, retard, they have a whole roadmap of development, why do you try to lecture people without actually checking the content you are talking about you insane fuck?Your sample also doesn't work because concept art showing full bodies in a game that mostly uses chibis is something they have done in the past too, of course they conceptualize it "normally" first and then shrink it down, the concept art was never saying they were going to make a game like SwooShit, you ignorant retard
>>58426276Anon I'm sorry but even you should be smart to know that just because not all projects get done you can't randomly clain one won't be done either. They are doing the game so as far we know the game is coming, anything else is baseless theorizing.
>>58426283I have, it's all concerning shit they're working on currently. But ILCA aren't Game Freak and clearly can't handle Champions AND a BW remake concurrently (and remakes take two years for Game Freak, thus the subcontractees get the same and fuck the noise, it's not supposed to REPLACE the new Gen pairs any more) so haven't started THAT project yet (after Champions launches and I HAVE said that before too. Fucking mid '26, they're just *being set free*? Don't make me laugh). But again, you think this shit is set in stone, I KNOW it's all made of silly putty and can (and does) be changed at a moment's notice (L: A pitched and intended to be wholly separate to the modern series, L: A launched complete with a reused MC from DPPt/BDSP, a full 3D render of the PC's bedroom from DPPt/BDSP, a story that lifted its broad notes from DPPt and a smorgasboard of other little hints, shout-outs and callbacks to the original games and even a solution to a side-quest in the remake). Tick. Tock. Unovatard. Never mind, they only wnet and continued remakes, because people online CRIED for them and frankly the people crying no are less numerous than the kids screaming "YES!" to one. Money talks and you're shouting for them to NOT take your money, small wonder they don't listen.
>>58426319>n-no, see das diffewentIt's also vaporware until it happens kid. And as it IS still 3 years away, shit can and does change (again, L: A pitched as something entirely separate from what it ACTUALLY became and remember, there's also the fact they HATE being "predicted" or feeling like there's nothing to show new and sparkly, cancelling something and going off on a new tangent because "it's known about" seems right up their alley coughazurefluteventingen4cough).
>>58426365>I SWEAR you have to pretend it's being cancelledNobody cares, retardo, they are making the game, the game is coming as far we know, your doomposting is pointless.
>>58426236Yeah the difference between RBY and FRLG graphics wise is huge. The difference between SwSh and Legends Galar will likely be gameplay, visuals not as much
>>58425964Nobody believed you because you're a retard, they're already planning a new gimmick for gen 10
>>58426350genuinely what is this schizo postseriously, this isn't how a human being talks
>>58425816The worst part is I really really like Z-A's combat, but Legends Galar leaks say they're doing some stupid 20 party Pokemon pikmin shit
>>58425945you really think they won't introduce new gimmicks? we're still on a new gimmick per gen.
>>58426319To his credit with Pokemon it happens way, way more frequently then it should. I guarantee you none of these games are going to come out the same way they have planned.>seed is reduced in scope or ends up being shit>gen 10 doesn't use pokemon engine x or procgen because gamefreak doesn't know how to program and it lags too much>legends galar gets turned into something slightly different thanks to feedback from the leaks
>>58425816GALAR HOME
I've noticed since Gen 8 they've alwaya tried to include something Japanese and something not Japanese. Gen 7>SM/USUM>LGPEGen 8>SwSh>SwSh DLC>PLA/BDSPGen 9>SV>SV DLC (Kitakami)>PLZAGen 10>W/W>Legends Galar>Seed
>>58426599>maybe one will be reduced in scope>maybe they won't use this engine>maybe this one will be slightly differentAnd even in your headcanon the games still come out
>>58426640SwSh DLC was chinese
>>58426670Yeah I know, its the non Japanese part of the gen
>>58426669No, I said "turned into something slightly different" I.E Legends Johto being turned into Z-A. AKA Legends Galar not coming out and something else coming out. Also liked the part where you diminished Gen 10 to just the engine point and not procgen being scrapped. If you need to misrepresent my predictions to make your point then your point is moot
>>58426613Galar in the Middle Ages could be Kino
>>58425956You do realize that's either going to be vaporware or chug along at 2 FPS with severely cut down theme park versions of each region, right?In other words, >>58425948
Ok this one is too on the nose kek
>>58426613Slowcooking
Unovabros?
>>58425956Fallout 76: Pokemon Edition
>>58427706Wait he's kinda cute
>>58425816>Gen X>The symbol for Dynamax is an XLOL
>>58428758Legends Galar references EVERYWHERE
>>58427706>>58428260I like em, though honestly hope that the chef hat is a shell still
I really can't picture Dynamax in Legends unless they majorly downsize it
>>58426002Bruh ZA legend is 3000 years old
>>58430131The hat looks like its made fron a Milcery
>>58430139I want to see Dynamax/GMax Pokenon roaming the land so bad, could be so fucking cool based off tge leaked concepts
>>58425832Fuck off with your shit fetish cumskull
I thought every gen gimmick was an isolated world unless they fucked up with portals like sumo/oras.Sadly I don't think they will ever make a game with all of them unless they make Stadium games again
>>58425816There's Galar references literally everywhere. The professors lab even has a fucking Galarian Rapidash statue ffs
>>58430298This looks pretty cool
>Legends games have been band-aid games for bad Gens, IV and VI thus far>VIII, the worst of the recent gens, is nextIt just fits.
>>58425832kys cringe macro nigger subhuman
