[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.jpg (244 KB, 1634x919)
244 KB
244 KB JPG
They don't eat Pokemon

Shut the fuck up about it already.
>>
File: 602849038.jpg (117 KB, 1280x720)
117 KB
117 KB JPG
>>58491774
>>
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (94 KB, 1280x720)
94 KB
94 KB JPG
>>58491774
>>
>>58491774
You've got kids talking about eating slowpoke tails in this very game, retard.
>>
Why are you so allergic to the idea, though? Why does that make you shit your pants? Do you work at GF, or something?
>>
>>58491774
You know there are fish Pokemon, right?

It has to be Pokemon because real animals were retconned out of existence after Gen 1.
>>
>>58491774
Tatsugiribros..............
>>
>>58491793
>>58491797
>>58491797
get new material

>hurrr they eat Tropius because they eat the fruit it produces
>>
>>58491774
You will eat the pokemon and you will be happy
>>
>>58491815
wipe your ass, team rocket apologist
>>
>>58491779
>>58491793
Slowpoke tails and Klawf claws apparently fall off on their own grow back. I suppose the problem with Neo Team Rocket in johto was that they were poaching wild slowpoke by manually cutting the tails off. Also milk obviously can be harvested from a healthy live animal and miltank has been around for 25 years.
>>58491774
Curiously, this does imply the idea of non-Pokemon wildlife which hasn't really come up since gen 1
>>
>>58491774
They describe Pokèmon as fish or birds all the time.
>>
>>58491774
>They don't eat Pokemon
there is nothing else to eat
unless the entire planet is vegan
>>
>>58491836
>Curiously, this does imply the idea of non-Pokemon wildlife which hasn't really come up since gen 1
Retard-kun...
>>
>>58491836
Basculin:
>Red- and blue-striped Basculin are very violent and always fighting. They are also remarkably tasty.
>In the past, it often appeared on the dinner table. The meat of red-striped Basculin is on the fatty side, and it's more popular with the youth.
>Blue-striped Basculin used to be a common food source. They apparently have an inoffensive, light flavor.
Sharpedo:
>It has a sad history. In the past, its dorsal fin was a treasured foodstuff, so this Pokémon became a victim of overfishing.
Wishiwashi:
>It's awfully weak and notably tasty, so everyone is always out to get it. As it happens, anyone trying to bully it receives a painful lesson
Barraskewda:
>This Pokémon has a jaw that's as sharp as a spear and as strong as steel. Apparently Barraskewda's flesh is surprisingly tasty, too.
>>
>>58491774
Fish here refers to fish Pokemon, tard
>>
File: Fishy.png (258 KB, 500x375)
258 KB
258 KB PNG
>>58491859
Unless....
>inb4 nothing outside the games counts
>>
>>58491774
>they don't eat pokemon
>says while posting people eating fish, which are pokemon in this world
KEK
>>
>>58491774
>In the past, it often appeared on the dinner table. The meat of red-striped Basculin is on the fatty side, and it's more popular with the youth.
At the very least, they used to.
>>
>>58491774
You will eat the bug type pokemon and you will like it
>>
File: pokemeat.jpg (283 KB, 1920x1080)
283 KB
283 KB JPG
>>
Why have they never made Slowpoke tails in real life
>>
>>58491779
These mussels don't look like pokemon to me
Real animals confirmed for existing as food source
>>
>>58491800
Not him but the idea is retarded.
The way pokemon are depicted and treated in the pokemon universe makes eating them akin to cannibalism.
>>
>>58491774
Sure buddy.
The region that introduced a pigmon also introduced ham. TOTALLY UNRELATED.
>>
>>58491774
There is literally a sushi fish pokemon retard
>>
>>58492047
Not all Pokemon are eaten, humanoid ones are definitely not.
>>
>>58491928
nothing outside the games counts
>>
Fish can refer to fish Pokémon you retarded.
Veluza is literally a dish. So is Tatsugiri.
>>
>>58492047
>cannibalism.
It actually, factually does not.
Why do you think otherwise?
>>
>>58491928
Anime. 1st season, therefore retconned.
>>
>>58492064
DP Library says humans eat fish Pokemon.
>>
>>58492069
Eating a species you can communicate with on a complex level and breed with is pretty much cannibalism
>>
>>58492077
>Eating a species you can communicate with on a complex level and breed with is pretty much cannibalism
It's actually not. Why do you think otherwise?
>Breed with
Not canon.
>>
>>58492064
What about those mussels here >>58491779
>>
>>58492077
>communicate with
What Pokemon that humans can "communicate with on a complex level" are eaten? Definitely not the fish ones
>breed with
Proof of that outside of folktales/myths?
>>
>>58492077
A magikarp doesn't communicate to the level of a starter or other humanoid mon.

>"Some Pokémon are more equal than others"
You know the story
>>
World where there are both Pokémon and animals > World where the Pokémon are just animals
>>
>>58492077
>Eating a species you can communicate with on a complex level
No matter how disgusting or morally frowned upon eating dogs or cats is, it's still not cannibalism, reta-
>and breed with
Oooooh, you're just trolling! My bad, carry on.
>>
>>58492085
>>58492086
All pokemon species are shown to fully understand human speech in the anime
And even in game they're implied to, as you can order them to do shit directly right after catching them.
>>
>>58492083
Can be part of a Pokémon we don't know.
Pokémon are magical creatures that spawn things out of thin air when they evolve.

I.e the starfish in Primarina's hair. It's an accessory not a living being.

Pokémon have clothes and things that aren't part of their anatomy.

Also. It's generic paella.jpg
Don't think it too hard.
>>
>>58492118
Different species, not cannibalism.
Simple as.
>>
>>58492103
Real life dogs are nowhere near the communication level achieved between human and pokemon.
And yet even then, eating them is still seen as weird.
So image how weird it would be to eat creatures like pokemon...
>>
>>58492118
Mmmmh now I want some Miltank BBQ
>>
>>58492118
Yep, a game mechanic for simplicity's sake definitely means all Pokemon can actually understand human speech. At most, they understand emotions and react to that, only specific Pokemon are capable of actually understanding human speech like Lapras and the Latis according to the dex. If it was a feature innate to all Pokemon, it wouldn't be specified.
>>
>>58492127
Doesn't mean it's cannibalism tho.
Your earlier claim is still incorrect.
>>
>>58492127
Keep ignoring all the dex entries that mention Pokemon being eaten then, retard. Nobody cares about your feelings.
>>
>>58492047
Is this little girl >>58491793 a cannibal/dog-eater? Obviously she's saying she ate like a shark fin or something. Pokemon are just animals, you can definitely eat some of them, but way fewer than real life animals. Most pokemon have dog and cat pet status, but not all.
>>
>>58492127
It's weirder to think there are creatures that aren't Pokémon that exist in a canon void based in old media from a writer who wanted to make a Jurassic Park ripoff for the ashnime.

How curious nobody mentions the existence of animals. The god of the world, incarnations of space and time, creators of the world all are Pokémon.

But i'm scared for the implications of pokéconsumption.

What about carnivorous Mons? Fuck Pyroar you'll eat tofu because the idea of seeing it eat a Skiddo is too scary.

And this is why this franchise can't grow up.
>>
File: IMG_8871.jpg (360 KB, 1290x828)
360 KB
360 KB JPG
Mmmm?
>>
>>58492144
Sex entries are massively incoherent and inconsistent though.
Also entries about pokemon being eaten (both by humans or by pokemon) were very scarce until they suddenly became overly edgy in Gen 7 (right when Masuda was told to fuck off, as we now know...).
>>
>>58492170
>Sex entries are massively incoherent and inconsistent though
Uh....
>>
>>58491774
>They don't eat Pokemon
They do according to the Pokedex.
>>
I think its less about being kid friendly and more about not wanting to make the world too complicated. Trying to figure out a working ecosystem is absurd
>>
>>58492170
>scarce until they suddenly became overly edgy in Gen 7
It was literally a major plot point in the second gen games, it was actually toned down after that. You're a faggot and a retard.
>>
>>58492170
>were very scarce
Gen 1:
>Pidgeot
>When hunting, it skims the surface of water at high speed to pick off unwary prey such as Magikarp.

>Golbat
>It attacks in a stealthy manner, without warning. Its sharp fangs are used to bite and suck blood.
You are wrong.
>>
There are predator Mons.
Stop living in your bubble.
>>
>>58492162
>It's weirder to think there are creatures that aren't Pokémon that exist in a canon void based in old media from a writer who wanted to make a Jurassic Park ripoff for the ashnime.
Not really.
Regular animals always existed alongside pokemon originally.
There were even some mentions of them in the games.

It's way, way weirder to imagine a world where only pokemon (about 1000 species if counting different stages of lines as separate) exists and where all these creatures survive on eating each others even though they can breed and communicate together (unlike real life food chain).

>How curious nobody mentions the existence of animals.
As said before, they're mentioned plenty of times
Some are even depicted in recent games like mussels.
Obviously the focus isn't on them, so you don't see them a lot, just like bathrooms, diseases, football stadiums...etc
>>
>>58492127
>Real life dogs are nowhere near the communication level achieved between human and pokemon.
Real-life dogs are still highly intelligent and it's still not cannibalism no matter the amount of mental gymnastics you want to perform. In real-life, it's morally acceptable to eat some animals and unacceptable to eat others, and the same can most likely be applied to the Pokémon world. Why is this concept so hard to grasp and accept?
>>
>Pokémon eat Pokémon.
>People eat Pokémon.
>Pokémon eat people.

Grow the fuck up.
>>
>>58492200
>"I can cite two (one of them without implied death) so it's not scarce!!!"

Do you know what the word means?
If you were to gather all the dex entries mentioning pokemon on pokemon predation, over 70% would be Gen 7 or after.
>>
>>58492229
You still aren't correct.
They do, infact, eat pokemon. Why does this upset you so much?
>>
>>58492208
>Regular animals always existed alongside pokemon originally.
>There were even some mentions of them in the games.

Back in gens 1-2 when the Pokémon world wasn't even established as a fantasy setting.

Kanto was just a japanese region but alternate timeline.

They retcon real animals with Pokémon equivalents when they're introduced.

They removed the existence of Guyana from Mew's lore.

And the dex giving them animal related names are only descriptive for the player, so out of the universe.
>>
>>58492211
Real dogs are retarded as fuck by pokemon standards.

>it's morally acceptable to eat some animals and unacceptable to eat others, and the same can most likely be applied to the Pokémon world. Why is this concept so hard to grasp and accept?
The issue being that all pokemon species fall in the "immoral" category, as they're all capables of more complex interactions with humans than real life dogs.
>>
>>58492235
>Back in gens 1-2 when the Pokémon world wasn't even established as a fantasy setting.
Pokemon was always a fantasy setting.
Magical shrinking animals are not real, they are fantasy.
>>
>>58492185
>Do people eat pokemon?
>Can people be in a relationship with pokemon?
Two things that will remain a mess in this franchise due to it being family friendly
>>
>>58492235
cope
>>
>>58492237
>The issue being that all pokemon species fall in the "immoral" category
Why would it be "immoral" to eat a fish?
>>
>>58492241
Pokémon 2 was going to have the whole map of Japan before they turned it into Johto + Kanto

And you know what I meant.
>>
>>58492251
For the very reason stated in the rest of the sentence you cut off
>>
>>
>>58492249
Coping what?
You're the one coping that people eat Pokémon and your evidence is old media.
>>
>>58492254
>Pokémon 2 was going to have the whole map of Japan before they turned it into Johto + Kanto
Okay. That doesn't mean that magical shrinking animals "are not fantasy".
Why do you think it does?
>>
>>58491774
So ALL of their meat is outsourced? That sounds scarily dystopian. Why not jsut eat the Tatsugiri?
>>
>>58492258
You haven't said why it's immoral yet.
You just keep insisting that it is, because it upsets you personally.

That doesn't mean it's "immoral". It just means you don't like it.
If you think you can prove it's immoral, go ahead, but you can't.
>>
File: HOME0845Go.png (109 KB, 512x512)
109 KB
109 KB PNG
Look, Anon.
Scary?
>>
>>58491815
The screenshot is literally from ZA, as new as you can get. Sorry
>>
>>58492274
N-NOOOOOO!!!!
IT DOESN'T COUNT!!!
B-B-BECAUSE I DON'T WANT IT TO, OKAY????
>>
>>58492266
Yeah it's worse, Pokémon is supposed to be this eco-friendly world where there are a lot of Pokémon everywhere. Why eating a few is such a big real?
>>
>>58492274
Ok but a bong designed this
>>
>>58492272
You said in this post >>58492211 that's it's "morally unacceptable" to eat some animals (by which you mean dog as it's the animal mentioned in the discussion).
To which I reply that then all pokemon species would fall in that "morally unacceptable" category as they all interact with humans on a more complex level than dogs do in real life.
What's hard to understand?
>>
>>58492292
Stopped reading right here. I'm not defending someone else's posts.
Want to try again?
>>
>>58492274
He's never seen actually swallowing a pokemon though
>>
>>58491915
/thread
>>
>>
>>58492274
Hot
>>
>>58492302
No humans are ever shown swallowing food either.
Must mean the humans don't eat food in the Pokemon canon, right?
>>
>>58492302
Ah sorry. Just because we don't see it doesn't mean they don't exist, amirite? >>58492208
>>
File: 1668744663257870.jpg (15 KB, 261x307)
15 KB
15 KB JPG
>>58492274
>>
>>58492315
Yeah that is the level of mental gymnastics
>>
>>58492300
10 seconds on MS paint + not an argument even if the two posts are really from different posters
If you're gonna reply to a reply to someone else's post, make yourself aware of what the discussion is about
>>
>>58492315
Ash is shown swallowing food plenty of times
>>
People eat Pokémon
Pokémon eat Pokémon
Pokémon eat people

Cry all you want but this is the world.
>>
>>58492329
You haven't proven to me why it's objectively immoral to eat a Pokemon yet.
What's the matter? Do it in your next reply, don't be scared.
>>
>>58492211
Octopi are one of the most intelligent species on earth, and yet they're used as food.
>>
>>58492315
I mean, his entire gimmick is literally about throwing back the pokemon he put in his mouths
It seems like it's more about using them as missiles than about eating them
>>
File: op is.png (215 KB, 664x710)
215 KB
215 KB PNG
>>58492341
>Morality
Surely there's a test
>>
>>58492337
Not in game, which is what OP considers canon apparently.
>>
>>58492343
>Octopi are one of the most intelligent species on earth,

Nah that's jus a meme
>>
>>58492237
>as they're all capables of more complex interactions
By which you mean? Provide some examples for these more "complex interactions", and do keep in mind that while Pokémon can understand human language (as can intelligent, real-life animals to some degree by the way), most of them still can't verbally communicate.
>>58492292
Not me.
>>58492300
If you want to prove there isn't a (You) next to my post, then the best thing to do would have not to cut off the screenshot right at the end of the post number, retard
>>
it’s all bioengineered
>>
>>58491815
>slowpoke tail isn't slowpoke meat because.... it just isn't
"fish is vegetarian" mental gymnastics
>>
You could be eating Alcremie shit.
>>
>>58492353
Happy now?
>>
>AAAIIIIEEEEE NOOOOOO STOP EATING POKEMON!!!!!
Okay, tell those Ghost Type twats to stop eating humans via their lifeforce, spirit, soul, etc. then, because it's completely immoral and basically cannibalism. They have literally no excuse because the game itself insists there is no such thing as an inherently evil Pokemon, only Pokemon who are influenced to do evil by evil humans. Even Pecharunt is just trying to please its dead adoptive grandparents who gave it the idea to be a greedy cunt, and species like Necrozma and Eternatus literally can't help their existences because they were born that way, and it's either "get killed lol" or suffer immensely for something that is no fault of their own.
>>
>>58492352
They are. You're just retarded.
>>
>>58492353
>By which you mean? Provide some examples for these more "complex interactions", and do keep in mind that while Pokémon can understand human language (as can intelligent, real-life animals to some degree by the way), most of them still can't verbally communicate.

Being able to understand human language and obey highly precise orders in battle and outside = complex interactions.
Not even the best trained dogs in real life (that most people would consider immoral to eat) can achieve the same level of interactions as pokemon can.
>>
>>58492363
Pokémon earting Pokémon
Pokémon eating people
People eating Pokémon X

Noooooo no way that's not possible!
And this is why this franchise will stay being affraid of basic biology. Like the fact Pokémon have SEX.
>>
>>58491779
Why are the recent devs obsessed with food lately? They did this shit in SV too. Lol.
>>
>>58491774
Eating Pokemon is kind of dodgy topic but definitively it's mentioned here and there, but mostly it's implied that some Pokemon can conveniently just drop and regrow parts of their bodies, like Crabrawler or Slowpoke.
>>
>>58492363
>Necrozma and Eternatus literally can't help their existences because they were born that way
Isn't that true of every animal that eats meat? You can't blame them for how they were born.
>>
>>58492363
>Okay, tell those Ghost Type twats to stop eating humans via their lifeforce, spirit, soul, etc.

They don't
It's just edgy dex entries like the ones about humans eating pokemon
>>
>>58492395
>It's not canon
>b-b-becaue it's JUST NOT....OKAY????
Not an argument.
>>
>>58492382
All three are bad and non canon
Both pokemon and humans eat regular animals, which are inferior non-intelligent creatures created by Arcreus to serve as protein sources for humans and pokemon
>>
>>58492395
"Just edgy dex entries"

Yeah sorry but unless I see it on screen it's not canon.
Because, Worldbuilding? What's that.
>>
>>58492392
At that point if their existsnce threatens humanity and can't be satiated otherwise then it's justified for humans to stop them.
>>
>>58492405
>All three are bad and non canon
Not according to the pokedex it's not.
>>
>>58492395
>they don't
Legends Z-A proves Litwick is a lifeforce eater with a sidequest where a boy thinks his sister is going to get killed by a Litwick because he knows about the fact it sucks the lifeforce out of things, only for it to turn out she was willingly giving the Litwick her lifeforce so it can be healthy.
Therefore, it's safe to assume all the other Pokedex entries about Ghost Types feasting on spiritual aspects is true, too, but they very deliberately frame it in a dangerous way, which is also in line with how some wild Pokemon interact with you in that game (aggressively attacking you until you black out, if Pokemon had a game over state you'd be dead right then and there if we're being honest).
>>
>>58492385
Spanish cuisine is superior. They couldn't make an iberian-themed region without focusing on the food.
Galar on the other hand...
>>
>>58492405
Your source is:
"Trust me bro"

Sorry I forgot the scene in Legends Arceus where it tells you "btw there are other creatures that aren't Pokémon but we don't mention them only have them in isolated farms that make food."
>>
>>58492406
Dex entries are bullcrap
They also say shit like Slowpoke evolving by being bitten by Shellder
>>
>>58492420
>Dex entries are bullcrap
More canon than anything you've ever said about the franchise.
Keep coping and seething, its cute.
>>
>>58492418
Curry with shit.

Because BRI'ISH
>>
>>58492248
Oh, go read charlotte's web.
>>
>>58492352
They use tools, have self-recognition and can even form rudimentary societies. Only reason no one cares is because they look like gross slimy aliens.
>>
>>58492420
Reference to a feature they couldn't include.
If they changed the whole Pokémon evolutive method would you be happy? That would require coding an already old mon. And everyone knows GF won't.
>>
Do people who believe pokemon are eaten based on dex entries also believe that the real world nations of france, india, australia, china, and japan exist within the pokemon world? or that clefable is an alien from the moon?
>>
>>58492430
>and can even form rudimentary societies

They're fucking solitary animals
>>
>>58492434
Yes and yes.
I certainly believe it more than a 13 year old on 4chan who's upset about his bro Magikarp being eaten since gen 1.
>>
>>58492385
they have nothing interesting to show and use basic things such as preparing food in shitty minigames to appeal to the common denominator with cutscenes of your character enjoying his super duper sandwich, adding nothing to gameplay
it's unimaginative, there surely are better ways to grant bonuses than this trash, but it's modern gamefreak after all...
>>
>>58492433
>Reference to a feature they couldn't include.

Just like regular animals mentioned in early games
>>
>>58492434
Most mentions of real things are retconned once there's a Pokémon equivalent.
>>
>>58492385
Japanese (Asian people on general) people love food as much as we love sex in the West.
>>
>>
>>58492434
>the real world nations of france, india, australia, china, and japan exist within the pokemon world?
Retconned into their Pokemon World equivalents or vague mentions (China is now referred to as "The East") in order to not address potential future plans for regions.
>or that clefable is an alien from the moon?
So you're OK with interdimensional and time travel anomalies like the UBs and Paradoxes, but Clefable being an alien species is too far?
>>
>>58492377
>best trained dogs can understand and obey orders
>pokemon can also do that but even better
Ok. Is that all? Can they also all do shopping? Use manmade items? Use a computer, social media? Understand moral concepts? Laws? Do they all use specific facilities to wash and relieve themselves?
>>
>>58492457
>>
>>58492457
Made from regular cow
>>
>>58492465
>Ham
>"Made from cow"
Holy shit you guys are retarded.
>>
>>58492464
>hog pokemon

Clearly implies regular hogs exist in the pokemon world, otherwise they wouldn't categorize it as such
>>
File: 1755224655911711.png (112 KB, 400x551)
112 KB
112 KB PNG
>>58492465
>ham
>being related to cows in ANY capacity
>>
>>58492465
>Anime 1st season
Awesome evidence

Cry harder
>>
>>58492437
Not always and honestly the fact that both lifestyles exist only highlights their intelligence.
>>
>>58492476
To make it understandable for the player?
Are you mentally challenged or something?
>>
>>58492463
>Ok. Is that all?

That's enough
If the best trained dogs are generally considered morally unacceptable to eat in our world, so would be pokemon in the pokemon world
>>
>>58492488
>To make it understandable for the player?

holy cope
>>
>>58492498
You can't prove that it's "morally unacceptable" to eat a dog.
You just don't like it, but that doesn't mean it's objectively morally unacceptable.
>>
It's the same bullshit copium with people that to this day believe people are not Pokémon-related.

Not like there are canonical PSYCHICS and people with absurd strenght feats.

But those abilities came out of their asses.
Because thinking that "Pokémon" is just the equivalent to the Animal Kingdom is too spooky.
>>
>>58492512
Can any of those humans shrink to pocket size?
Then they aren't pocket monsters.
>>
>>58492508
Didn't say it was "objectively" morally unacceptable.
I said it was to most people.
>>
>>58492505
Cope what? Give me evidence besides the names given out of the universe for the human player the human CHILD playing the game.

If a Pokémon game used only Pokémon terms it would become harder to understand for the target audience.

P.s: You're retarded
>>
>>58492525
So you just don't like it, thanks for confirming that you've been using the words "morally unacceptable" incorrectly.
>>
>>58492476
Or because they identified it as a thing and decided to call it "hog"
>>
>>58492476
By your logic, Non-Pokemon Dragons, literal creatures of fantasy who have never existed in reality, also exist in the Pokemon World.
Is this REALLY the rabbit hole you want to start going down?
>>
>>58492538
There are dragons irl.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komodo_dragon
>>
>>58492531
Most humans don't like the idea of eating creatures they have complex interactions with (dogs in real life, pokemon in the pokemon universe...).
Whether it's objective morality or subjective to the human mind is irrelevant.
>>
>>58492517
You never saw one doing it. Why people would do that?
Yet we can teleport with tech.
Like you can Pokémon from PC to your team.

Curious how people also go heal in Pokémon Centers, no hospitals anywhere around.

People just lost the capacities of a full Pokémon but compensate with tech.
Why is this so hard to understand?
Fucking creationists.
>>
>>58492552
So now you're argument is that "morality doesn't exist".
So you agree with it, it's not immoral to eat a dog or a Pokemon. Glad we figured this out.
>>
File: 15-shield_55_a_9.jpg (99 KB, 900x506)
99 KB
99 KB JPG
>>58492549
Ah, magical. Wonderful.
>Claps.mp3
A reptile named after a fantasy creature makes the fantasy creature real.
8000 IQ Logic
>>
>>58491915
You are wrong, sorry
>>
>>58492555
>Curious how people also go heal in Pokémon Centers
Show one game where that happens.
You won't, because you can't.
>>
>>58492498
>That's enough
It's not. Your core argument was that eating Pokémon is akin to cannibalism, which is again factually wrong, and for it to even resemble cannibalism on the spiritual level, Pokémon would need to behave just like humans and understand all strictly human concepts, like laws. Which they can't.
>>
>>58492568
It's literally called a dragon, and it exists.
Why do you think it's not a dragon? Please, tell me your incorrect reasoning for this immense retardation of yours.
>>
>>58492565
People don't eat dogs because they taste like shit, that's it. Most omni/carnivorous eat herbivourous species.
>>
>>58492549
Cool, so how do Komodo Dragons correlate to seahorses? Because Horsea is classified as the "Dragon Pokemon" but has extremely few qualities that should connect it to the Komodo Dragon.
>>
Would you eat an alive Alcreamie? How would it feel like?
>>
>>58492583
Sure. But it's not immoral to eat pokemon, dogs, or any kind of animal, now that you've decided that morility doesn't exist.
Try and stay on topic.

>>58492585
Ask Gamefreak, I didn't design the Pokemon or name the animals.
>>
>>58492574
Excuse me why else you regain trainer health in Z-A?

Why nowhere in a Pokémon region there's a single hospital. And the excuse of "we don't see it" is BULLSHIT.

Paldea is a fucking whole peninsula and we don't see a SINGLE hospital out there.

Alola is a touristic attraction but the most we see for medicine are Pokémon Centers.

But excuse me. Surely there's a big giant invisible human hospital, that's the barrier to not go out of bounds.
>>
>>58492585
It's also called a (sea)dragon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_seadragon
>>
>>58492599
I'm not the one arguing about morality.
I just explain why it's not common.
>>
>>58492607
>Not even 1 (one) example
*yawn*
>>
File: 17584872648234743.png (61 KB, 320x312)
61 KB
61 KB PNG
>>58491774
>>
>>58492608
Two different species not even from the same environment are called Dragon therefore DRAGONS ARE REAL!
>>
>>58492621
see
>>58492582
>>
>>58492599
>ermmm ask gamefreak, idk
And yet you sure do seem to know a lot about how real world animals exist in Pokemon. What happened to your sudden absolute authority on how the worldbuilding of the franchise works, bucko? You can't rationalize why a seahorse is called a dragon because it's apparently got enough connective tissue that scientists see similarities between a seahorse and a komodo dragon?
>>
>>58492613
Give me one example to prove me wrong.
I'm waiting.
>>
>>58492635
>And yet you sure do seem to know a lot about how real world animals exist in Pokemon.
I haven't said anything on the topic.
Please quote the posts you think are mine, so I can correct you.
>>
>>58492576
Pokemon eating each others is definitely cannibalism though, as they can breed with each others and fully communicate
>>
>>58492638
Sure, when you prove your own claims to be true.
I asked for proof first, so it's only fair.
Don't be scared, I'm waiting! Just like a real debate, we can't move on to the next topic until you answer me, or you concede.

Post your example.
>>
>>58492583
Killing a dog without a good justification (like self-defense) is literally illegal in the West
>>
>>58492647
Communication is irrelevant regarding if it's canniblism or not.
Why do you keep bringing it up?
>>
>>58492434
>or that clefable is an alien from the moon?
this one is real tho
>>
>>58492650
Your counterargument is "no it's not"
Give me your source.

Why every slightly medical person only specializes in Pokémon?
>>
>>58492607
>NOOOOOO WHERE'S THE HOSPITALS
Not relevant to your Pokemon Journey, therefore they don't need to be a location you can visit.
This is also why 99% of building interiors are inaccessible nowadays, because they contain nothing relevant to your Pokemon Journey unless they're a building that houses a story-relevant element or a Gym.
Or do you think Paldea has a serious housing problem because the player and Nemona are the only people who have "real houses"?
>>
>>58492658
Breeding however is
And pokemon can breed with each others (and even with humans)
>>
>>58492664
You haven't proven that the Pokemon Center heals humans yet.
Why are you so afraid of proving yourself right?
>>
>>58492655
Sure. But that's a legal thing, not moral
>>
>>58492671
>Breeding however is
No. It's not.
>>
>>58492676
It's a law based on morality.
There's a reason why the same isn't true for mice.
>>
File: 1756932454017962.jpg (31 KB, 736x740)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
>>58492647
>Pokemon eating each others is definitely cannibalism though, as they can breed with each others
So according to you, Machoke eating a Magikarp would be cannibalism? Because they can breed with each other, right? Do you even think before you type?
>>
>>58492059
I'd eat Gardevoir's ass
>>
>>58492669
>Not relevant to your Pokemon Journey, therefore they don't need to be a location you can visit

Sure. Because cities between forests full of venomous creatures and species capable of shooting fire don't have the need to heal.

Again. Is that paldean hospital in this room with us now? "Off screen", off screen my ass
>>
>>58492686
>based on morality.
Then you should be able to show me where this "morality" exists, outside of the law.
But you can't... Because it's just an abstract concept, it doesn't really exist.
>>
>>58492694
>So according to you, Machoke eating a Magikarp would be cannibalism? Because they can breed with each other, right? Do you even think before you type?

Do YOU even think?
What do you think matters the most when it comes to who you should eat or not, physical appearence or ability to fully communicate and breed with the target?
Would you eat your family?
>>
>>58492722
Look up the definition of cannibalism. Post it for the whole class to see
>>
>>58492722
>What do you think matters the most when it comes to who you should eat or not
flavor?
>>
>>58492672
Point the human hospital in this map.
"Not relevant for your journey" COPIUM
>>
File: paldea.png (221 KB, 1024x1024)
221 KB
221 KB PNG
>>58492738
>>
File: Smoke-Poke Tail.png (323 KB, 900x560)
323 KB
323 KB PNG
>>58491774
They literally do
>b-b-but it's "ethically farmed"
This is cope and they're still eating Pokémon meat
>>
>>58492750
Where is the human hospital here you retard?
There's no offscreen in Paldea you can see the fucking whole region.
>>
>>58492738
Is the human population in the pokémon world only a few hundred people because those are all the ones we see in game?
>>
>>58492786
Ah okay sorry. Not enough people to care about. Keep moving the goalpost.
>>
File: groked.png (209 KB, 927x1465)
209 KB
209 KB PNG
End of the debate
>>
>>58492797
Answer the question
>>
>>58492803
Kill yourself, AI faggot, no one cares
>>
>>58492804
What question? There's no question to answer.
>>
>>58492696
Neither the player character nor any of their friends are never grievously injured, therefore you have no reason to visit a hospital for humans.
Pokemon hospitals aren't relevant to your journey either, even with the prospect of a terminally ill mon, because the story establishes that Arven's Mabosstiff is beyond traditional cures and MUST rely on Herba Mystica, therefore, you have no reason to see or visit a Pokemon hospital.
Also, does Paldea have a housing problem based on your "I don't see it, therefore it doesn't exist" criteria? Because as I said, the player character and Nemona are the only people in Paldea who actually have houses with interiors you can visit.
>>
>>58492434
>or that clefable is an alien from the moon?
Why wouldn't it be? Deoxys is an alien pokemon too.
>>
File: 50-nemona'sdormroom.jpg (38 KB, 640x360)
38 KB
38 KB JPG
>>58492822
OOOOOOH my bad

Sorry, the human hospital is BEHIND THE FUCKING BATHROOM DOORS!

They're connected like in Monster Inc.
>>
>>58492844
Where does Mew's truck get gas if we never see gas stations in the game?
>>
>>58492162
>Pyroar you'll eat tofu because the idea of seeing it eat a Skiddo is too scary.
Would a Pyroar eating a Skiddo even count as carnivory?
>>
>>58492162
>What about carnivorous Mons? Fuck Pyroar you'll eat tofu because the idea of seeing it eat a Skiddo is too scary.

Pyroar will eat inferior regular animals
That way he can eat meat without having to eat a Skiddo that could be his half brother or his offspring
>>
>>58492926
But the regular animal is still connected to Pyroar because the regular animal is a creation of God, just like Pyroar. Therefore, he's still eating "family" in a sense.
He'd also still be eating "family" if he went vegan, as vegetarian options are of God's creation too, and many plant-based lifeforms are living creatures, which is why a lot of Grass Type Pokemon are just sapient flowers and shit.
>>
>>58492899
It's a Pokémon not a plant.
>>
File: 089.jpg (53 KB, 500x376)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
With the idea that in the Pokémon world that humans eat Pokémon, as in much the same manner that how in real-life humans eat animals, and being seen as not unambiguously wrong. It's just one of the many contradictions in canon, and unfortunately for this franchise, there's plenty of those. It's mostly the result of several aspects relating to Pokémon being a huge several decades-long multimedia franchise.

Here is a general idea on how to handle such contradictions. Just two main questions. First question, does the thing contradict more important parts of the franchise and/or the themes/morals of the franchise? If yes, then second question, are the most likely reasons for that being the case good reasons? Then, if no to the second, it's best to treat it as not canon.

Humans eating Pokémon goes against the general ideas of the franchise, and is mostly brought up at all in the series for stupid reasons. So it doesn't deserve to be treated seriously. Like with some of the food that's meat being shown in Camp in gen 8 and Picnics in gen 9, they just didn't want to bother to remember not including meat for every new food they made for that new game mechanic. Another thing being Pokédex Entries, which even beyond this have many issues with them. You'll notice that the idea of humans eating Pokémon is being brought up less and less as the franchise goes on. Whereas, conversely, as the franchise goes on, Pokémon are shown more and more with human-level cognition at minimum, all Pokémon. The bond between humans and Pokémon is a major part of the franchise.

https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Pok%C3%A9mon_predation#Humans_eating_Pok%C3%A9mon

Conversely, the idea of humans eating Pokémon by-products and other stuff produced by Pokémon is another matter, that idea doesn't face the same issues which killing Pokémon to eat them does.

https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Pok%C3%A9mon_predation#Food_produced_by_Pok%C3%A9mon
>>
>>58492993
>evidence in dex entries
>evidence in item descriptions
>evidence in npc dialogue
>evidence in the ashnime
>"b-b-b-but muh FEELINGS..."
>>
File: 1716074043990082.jpg (24 KB, 465x466)
24 KB
24 KB JPG
Or maybe, we can all just accept that Pokemon is a franchise with dogshit worldbuilding that can't remain consistent for even five seconds, and constantly changes its rules on a per-media basis to suit whatever the writer of a particular scene needs in that exact moment and exact time, with little to no regard for the bigger picture, because only turbo autists will care long enough to notice the contradictions and inconsistencies, and when they point them out, everyone will point and laugh at the loser autist for getting so worked up over a children's game, since, as we know, children's media doesn't actually need to be of good, strong, logical quality, it just needs to shut the brats up long enough for mommy to get another swig of beer.
>>
>>58492694
>>58492722
its just like praying mantises eating their mate, bros
>>
The anime also had this episode about a cat breeder

So dog/cat/bird/fish etc. are just words used to categorize Pokemon with similar characteristics, much like how we use those words for animals in the real world.
>>
>>58492947
But then you have mons like Oddish and the Roselia line that are literal plants... Like at what point is a grass type not a plant? I mean if its movement then venus flytraps?
>>
>>58493053
>sneasel
>weavile
>cats
>>
>>58493021
Being for children has never excused poor quality. Children deserve quality content.
>>
Good thread. Highly autistic back and forth, but in the end everyone realized they're taking a children's monster catching game way too seriously.
>>
>>58493028
>just be a literal braindead bug bro
>>
Why does it fucking matter if people eat pokemon or not? genuinely who gives a shit?
i own a pet rooster and i still eat fried chicken
>>
>>58493021
>mommy to get another swig of beer.
You mean down another glass of wine...
Seriously you'd think that shit was nectar of the gods at the rate women devour it...
>>
>>58493063
True, but good luck explaining that to most people. Remember that the primary fixation of today's youth is Italian Brainrot, literal AI slop. That's how little people care about the quality of what their children consume.
>>58493090
Depends on how much government entitlement she gets based on how many kids she's shat out.
>>
File: 1721072514177.jpg (123 KB, 1080x1027)
123 KB
123 KB JPG
The Indian elephant to Copperajah retcon in PLA cemented it.

Before that, we had LGPE retconning Lt. Surge form "Lightning American" to "Lightning Lieutenant".
>>
File: grok poke.png (447 KB, 949x3282)
447 KB
447 KB PNG
Grok has spoken
Eating pokemon is immoral
>>
>>58493088
It's literally one of the only two things that truly matter (alongside if people fuck pokemon or not)
>>
>>58493110
>Grok has spoken
So nothing of value was spoke...
>>
>>58492417
>she was willingly giving the Litwick her lifeforce so it can be healthy.
wtf?
>>
>>58493079
you will never be a pokemon
>>
File: Pokemon (0088).gif (411 KB, 320x240)
411 KB
411 KB GIF
>>58493006
You're unironically going "muh feelings" at me. Funny. You fail the counter how I said the concept goes against the franchisee's own feelings, and major ones at that. The whole idea of the bond between humans and Pokémon is a much more major aspect of the franchise than whenever they couldn't be bothered to not mention humans eating meat from and moments can't be bothered to care how much it doesn't make sense for the franchise.

Pokémon is huge franchise with contradictions and retcons. It's stupid to say everything should be taken totally serious as canon. Have some basic media literacy.

>>58493070
Anon. What did you expect? Did you forget where we are?
>>
>>58493176
Who tf wants to be a pokemon.
I want to be a pokemon trainer and date Diantha
>>
If dex entries were canon all civilization would have been wiped out long ago. Entire maps have to be redrawn after one singular ttar gets angry, and that isn't among the 100 most insane examples

You can accept the world as it is presented to you as canon, or you can accept the dex as canon, but the two are blatantly incompatible with each other
>>
>>58493062
Sneasel may be based on the weasel and the kamaitachi but it still has cat-like features
>>
>>58493263
>You're unironically going "muh feelings" at me.
>You fail the counter how I said the concept goes against the franchisee's own feelings
I'm loling at your lack of self awareness. No, pointing to evidence in Pokemon media is not "muh feelings". Arguing that it feels wrong therefore the media is lying is "muh feelings".
>>
>>58493300
>are you saying that machoke eating a magikarp is cannibalism because they can also breed with eachother
>animals/insects eating their mates is normal
>wtf I don't want to be a insect
>you're not a pokemon I wasn't talking about you
>wtf I don't want to be a pokemon
brilliant display of reading comprehension itt
>>
>>58493060
It's a Pokémon not a plant.
>>
>>58493501
I think you replied to the wrong post
>>
File: 1754754376316825.png (6 KB, 1098x33)
6 KB
6 KB PNG
So one of the arguments against eating Pokemon is that they're more intelligent than regular animals and can understand humans. But we have several dex entries that points to the opposite like Lapras
>>
File: 1745378113457769.png (10 KB, 995x55)
10 KB
10 KB PNG
>>58494091
Latios also
>>
File: 1751929174363071.png (6 KB, 919x32)
6 KB
6 KB PNG
>>58494101
Even Pokemon as recent as Magearna still has the dex implying not all Pokemon understand humans
>>
File: 083.png (137 KB, 475x475)
137 KB
137 KB PNG
>>58491774
Pokemon have been hunted for food since the beginning of the series
>>
>>58494180
B-but doesn't count... Because I said so!
>>
>>58491774
People eating pokemon is more believable than the FreakLeak
>>
Even Mystery Dungeon had a Wurmple afraid that his partner was going to eat him.
>>
>>58492073
That statue was pulled directly from an illustration from Pocket Monsters Encyclopedia. Which is still canon as LA reconfirmed.
>>
>>58494477
Not really.
>>
File: Harkness_Test.png (132 KB, 1051x1393)
132 KB
132 KB PNG
In essence I feel like this debate is kinda similar to picrel
>>
>>58491800
He's a schizo vegan poster, we get them every now and then just mock them and move on.
>>
>>58492047
Pokemon are literally treated with the same respect we give real life animals.
>>
>>58494518
Leftwing brainrot:
>"This creature is stupid so having sex with it is immoral but murdering it isn't"

Actual intelligent logic:
>"This creature is stupid so anything goes"
>>
>>58494721
there aren't giant rock snakes in real life
>>
>>58491800
I dunno man, I'm not even a furfag but the idea just never sat right with me. To me the idea that these ultra powerful creatures that are nearly indestructible and are often depicted as being companions to humans are just being killed in some slaughterhouses for their meat just seems kind of silly
>>
>>58494738
Pokemon is a silly world
>>
>>58491836
>Curiously, this does imply the idea of non-Pokemon wildlife
No it does not. There are as many fish pokemon as bird pokemon.
>>
File: 1754363094601069.webm (240 KB, 854x480)
240 KB
240 KB WEBM
>>58492077
No.
>>
>>58492127
Dumb white poster.
>>
>>58492266
China does that and they're perfectly fine.
>>
>>58494727
There are.
>>
>>58494721
Have you taken a look at ZA's plot?
>>
>>58494740
Not really, it's been made pretty clear that the only real difference between the real world and Pokemon is just that, that it has Pokemon instead of animals.
>>
>>58495112
>that it has Pokemon instead of animals.
This isn't a trivial difference
>>
>>58492738
>No proof
*yawn*
I accept your concession.
>>
They eat their friends because *pokedex/library legends that cite myth and legend as their sources*
THEY JUST DO, OKAY CHUD
GOD
>>
File: 1740449606860908.png (9 KB, 981x101)
9 KB
9 KB PNG
>>58492348
>>
>>58492463
>Do they all use specific facilities to wash and relieve themselves?
pokemon do not relieve themselves with the exceptions of darumaka and turtonator, who are explicitly stated to be capable of shitting
>>
POKEMON! DO! NOT! SHIT!
POKEMON! DO! NOT!!! EAT!!!!! OTHER!!!!!!!!! POKEMON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I FUCKING HATE YOU ALL I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU
>>
>>58491928
Nothing outside the game counts.
>>
I think eating Pokemon is actually quite fine to me. Would it have been an issue for me as a kid or if I was an autistic sensitive adult, sure. But I’m open to the idea of the world becoming more realistic. If the series wants to go back to its naturalistic roots, it’d be fine with me. As long as they sourced the Pokemon ethically. Still, you have autists like >>58495822 who have Pokemon as their comfort series so it’ll never be anything but vague.
>>
>>58492385
its just ohmori, PLA and ZA didn't have a food emphasis
>>
>>58495822
>POKEMON! DO! NOT! SHIT!
(most) pokemon do not shit
>Darumaka's droppings are hot, so people used to put them in their clothes to keep themselves warm. - darumaka's dex entries in white/x/omega ruby
>It gushes fire and poisonous gases from its nostrils. Its dung is an explosive substance and can be put to various uses. - turtonator's dex entry in moon
>Eating sulfur in its volcanic habitat is what causes explosive compounds to develop in its shell. Its droppings are also dangerously explosive. - turtonator's dex entry in shield
i think the realistic implication is that most pokemon can shit but it's much funnier to assume these two are the only ones that can
>>
>>58495854
NO NO NO NO NO
THEY DO NOT SHIT
THEY
DO
NOT
SHIT
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>
>>58491774
So you’re telling me they don’t eat Magikarp? Ever? Why are there fishers in the games then?
>>
>>58492465
In the very same fucking episode we have them thinking about eating a Magikarp.
>>
>>58491774
>>
>>58491774
some regions do
some don't
>>
No one eats pokemon
Period
>>
>>58496032
Even when starving they refused to eat it
That tells all we need to know about how willing pokemon world humans are to eat pokemon
>>
File: 1483155414771.jpg (13 KB, 230x208)
13 KB
13 KB JPG
Stop having conniptions over the idea that Pokémon are eaten.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.