>>58492189
How can "most" of 230 be Kalos mons when there are only 70 Kalos mons?

>>58492206
oh yeah it really wasn't that big was it
the selection is still just
>kalos
>kanto
>megas
>random dex filler like watchog
it's a small selection and it isnt even a good one

>>58492189
Yes for two reasons.
One, ZA is a spinoff.
Two, we've consistently seen that the game quality in the mainline games is shit, and one of the things they list as taking too much development time is adding tons of mons they need to update, reanimate, place in the world, rebalance, etc.

>>58492189
ZA is horse shit and its rightfully been getting bashed

>>58492189
>Spinoff have less Pokemon than a main game
Imagine my shock. PLA had 240 and i didn't saw any of you fags complain about that

>How dare this game which takes place in Kalos include all the Kalos Pokémon?

>>58492227
>>58492233
Not a spinoff tho

@58492271
"Legends" = spinoff
No go fuckoff

@58492408
https://www.gamefreak.co.jp/works/pokemon/

>Main Series

1 Pokemon = 1 content

>>58492189
Because most people already got over this and collectively realized that there are way more elements that should be prioritized before the amount of available Pokemon. If the game itself is dogshit who cares how many Pokemon are in it?

SwSh set the precedent for Z-A to half a dex that's half the size of a 2013 game criticized for having a lack of content

remember when pokemon snap only had like 60 pokemon? baka my head

Anyone have the pepe macro that goes
>We will cut Pokemon to improve the game
>Ok I will hold you to that standard
>SwSh sucks because it didn't improve anything while Legends did
because it's exactly that, again

File: 1755091498198424.png (683 KB, 790x833)

683 KB PNG

>>58493284

From what I can tell every single game before Gen 6 had less than 230 Pokémon available before postgame (the only metric that matters), and even including postgame the first 3 Gens still had less
Also Gen 6 might have the best set of new mons since Gen 3, it's either that or 7