[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1707723929381.gif (81 KB, 640x640)
81 KB
81 KB GIF
There's too many Pokemon. They should've stopped after 649
>>
>>58504464
*stopped at 178
ftfy
>>
they should have stopped after Charizard
>>
I think they should stop at 1500 or 2000.
>>
Should have stopped after gen 2.
>>
>>58505383
1500 is kind of nice after the original 150. Exactly ten times the original number
>>
They should have stopped after 493, and made regional forms, mega's and new varients of the existing Pokemon. I would rather a Fire/Ghost Gengar than some trashy new gen design
>>
>>58504464
I think they should stop making new gens for a couple of years to make sure every existing pokemon has a pool or good battle and overworld animations
>>
>>58504464
There are only 151 Pokémon.
>>
XY did one thing right and that was adding a very small amount new pokemon.
>>
There can never be "too many" Pokémon. They should be expected to keep adding over 100 Pokémon each gen, while still having every previous gen Pokémon be transferable, while still having the games be good on top of that. It's objective fact that they can do that. There's no excuse. It should be the minimum expected of them.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.