Are you guys ready to drop the cope and admit that ZA is a dumpster fire?Just like Scarlet & Violet, this game is absolute trash as well and people who buy it should be flogged.>nooo you're not a real fan!!!!I used to be a diehard Pokemon fan but I'm not a mindless npc who buys whatever slop Nintendo and Game Freak serve me.They're purposely making shitty games.Pic rel is the best thing about the game.
>>58545510Cool
>>58545510
>>58545515>>58545527>pretending to be C o O L by pretending to enjoy $100 tech demo AI slopEmbarrassing.
The game is already 15% offAfter a week of sales ROFL
>>58545510WAHH I DIDNT LIEK GAME AND IT WASNT FOR MEEEE
>>58545554>"it wasnt for me"Are you saying there are people who are purposely looking for games that look like shit?The buildings look like dogshit. But yea that's just your niche
>>58545562Go stare at the walls some more. I'll be staring at $9,999,999 and my Shiny Alphas.
>>58545540>pretending that ZA is a "dumpster fire" and "absolute trash" when it's mediocre at worstI'm all for calling out Nintendo and GF's extremely shitty practices, but by avoiding any semblance of impartiality, you're no better than the mindless NPCs you're denouncing, retard
>>58545575"Mediocre" is giving it too much credit. Can you name some redeeming qualities of the game? Dont include shit that you get for granted like the fact that a Pokemon game includes Pokemon.Look at the game objectively and tell me what makes it mediocre as opposed to disappointing.>game is all about a city and the city looks like shit>cant enter buildings in a game set in a city>it's basically a tiny maze that you get bored of in 30 minutes>dialogue is AI slop>story is unbelievably lackluster>overpriced, should be $20-30
Imagine paying 70 bucks for bare minimum slop just because it has the "Pokemon" logo in it and it triggers some sort of an emotional childhood impulse in your brain.You guys call yourselves adults?
You will never enter a building in a Pokemon game again, and you will be happy.Enjoy rectangles with JPG's slapped on them.
>>58545510DamnShe got a tight ass
Cute butt
>>58545603You're on /vp/ everyone here in a manchild, that includes you.
>>58545656At least I just fap to Eevee kid
QUIT HAVING FUN
>>58545510Not even in porn is ZA any good, they really toned down the female characters, and only the corporate pick has tits.
>>58545667> QUIT HAVING FUNThe last time I had fun in a Pokemon game was Sword & Shield.And stop telling me it was a bad game. It wasnt. It was a solid entry, even though a slight downgrade from USUM.
>>58545562>Are you saying there are people who are purposely looking for games that look like shit?yeah, pokemon fans, faggot
>>58545758Fuck, I never realized how bad the old and "great" Pokemon games looked because I didnt play any other pixel games
I bet Game Freak is just a small collective of old autists who have no idea how to make games and they're just trying to learn the basics of Unity together. The quality of modern Pokemon games is low because Game Freak consists of people who are still watching tutorials on how to make 3d games and have no idea how to actually make em. And then the Pokemon Company decided to keep it that way because the money keeps coming in regardless.I would let this slide if they weren't holding a trillion dollar budget and just going "nah we dont wanna spend any money, but you give us yours instead".
I haven't even played ZA but I will never understand the graphics complaints about Pokémon games when the series has consistently ranged from the poor side of mediocre to fucking hideous
>>58545907Maybe because it's getting worse over time.SwSh looked better than ZA. They're going backwards.SV was a mess, but at least the buildings were 3d instead of just flat rectangles.
>>58545510as someone who has hated all pokemon games on switch, za is the best pokemon game so faroutside the shitty flat textures on buildings, i don't have any other complains (except the pricing obviously)t. pirated all games
>>58545935>za is the best pokemon game so farHope you're at least being paid to shill this garbage , there's nothing in this game that is better than something from previous games.
>>58545510>>58545593OP, I'm really gonna try to level with you here. You need to explain why something is bad if you want people to take you seriously. Stop spazzing out, not everyone who pushes back at you is a fan of the game.>game is all about a city and the city looks like shitI agree but you need to post more examples than 1 picture of wall texture>cant enter buildings in a game set in a cityThat is bad yes, but again, examples>it's basically a tiny maze that you get bored of in 30 minutesNeed proof of this>dialogue is AI slopNow THIS needs proof otherwise don't even try to claim it.>story is unbelievably lacklusterExplain>overpriced, should be $20-30Agreed.If you actually care about convincing people you need to put in actual effort.
>>58545593I can tell you haven't played it.>city concept works, really well>implying there are no interiors>it is dense and there's a lot to do>dialogue better than any pokemon game post gen 5>its above average story wise>you're poor
>>58545892Ive been playing since gen 1, back during gen 3,4, and 5 everyone unanimously agreed pokemon had bad graphics but the simplicity also aged well
>>58545935>za is the best pokemon game so farThis is like that one company that gave ZA a score of 100/100You can tell it was paid for
>>58545969>>58545981Have you watched any of the 30-minute criticism videos of the game on Youtube?People like BeatEmUps have made in-depth reviews of these games.The problem is that fans tend to avoid these videos so they wouldn't get negative vibes. Which results in echo chambers, as usual.Nintendo in general has been so shit lately it's insane, but Nintendo fans don't want to hear about it.
>>58547526>anon its obvious you haven’t played it>but have you bothered to get any opinions from YouTubers??????lmao is this even bait
>>58547588>its obvious you haven’t played itWell the point of boycotting shit products is to not buy them.
>>58545510Look at all that Pokemon ZA
>>58545510>>58547526>person turbosperging over the game>got their opinion from random whotubersevery. single. time.calling people NPCs when you need someone else to form your opinions for you is an impressive lack of self-awareness
>>58548045Keep coping, it's not gonna make the game good.
>it thinks a bunch of upset overgrown children downvoting a game on a website irrelevant to the casual mass-market means a fuck
>>58545907Then:>Graphics are mediocre at best but they look fine enough and aren't an ugly technical nightmare>Game costs $30-$40 at most, even less if you got them on sale, on a $100-$200 handheld console. Now:>Graphis look mediocre and extremely dated in almost every way including aesthetics, most of the games are a technical nightmare with numerous bugs, LOD issues, and so on>Game Costs $60-$70 + $30-$35 DLC, the games never go on sale, on a $300-$500 console. I think it's pretty obvious why people complain, anon.
>>58545510I like it more than ScatVomit albeit but less than Arceus to be quite honest though however may per-haps/chance o algo
>>58547526>unironically citing a fucking YouTuber’s opinion as a reason I should think anythingHoly fuck lmao, burn everything you own that connects to the internet, anon. Do it tonight before it’s too late, you may still have time left to become a real person, please
>>58547526
>>58545562Wall textures don't affect the core gameplay loop.>>58545615There are plenty of enterable buildings. You're objectively wrong. >>58547526>Have you watched any of the 30-minute criticism videos of the game on Youtube?No, I actually played the game and formed my own opinion.I hope Nintendo keeps making slop like this because I'll keep buying it and I'll continue to enjoy my purchases. Go stomp your feet elsewhere and shit your pants elsewhere.
>>58545510>Just like Scarlet & Violetlol no. This game is actually fun
