[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_9944.jpg (71 KB, 850x599)
71 KB
71 KB JPG
I just realized something, how is it that Fairy has 5 female specialists and yet not a single one of them is busty nor curvy?
They’re all flat

Nearly every other type has at least 1 busty female trainer
EX; Ghost has Shauntal, Dark has Karen, Poison has Klara, Psychic has Sabrina, Flying has Skyla, Ice has Lorelei, Glacia, Candice, and Melony, Electric to a lesser extent got Elesa, Canari, and even Iono, etc.

It’s one thing if you only have 3 or less female specialists like Water or Ground, but it’s another when you have 5 of them and they’re all flat, not even the hags that are Jacinthe and Opal in her 20s-30s are busty
>>
That's what off-model art is for.
>>
>>58620629
because fairies embody feminine energy and obesity is the opposite of beauty
>>
>>58620636
The likes of Shauntal, Karen, Klara, Clair, Sabrina, and Elesa are anything but obese, they’re just busty

The only obese ones here are Melony, Katy, and Ryme
>>
>>58620648
Stop consuming off-model porn, fag. How are Elesa and Clair busty? Their chest size is modest at best.
>>
>>58620648
please reference the official models and renders of these characters, not the fanart you fap to
>>
She just hides it well trust me
>>
File: IMG_8891.jpg (463 KB, 2048x1080)
463 KB
463 KB JPG
>>58620653
>>58620666
>>
>>58620636
>obesity is the opposite of beauty
>venusofwillendorf.mp4
>>
>>58620676
I may’ve exaggerated Elesa a little but she’s not flat by any means, she’s a B-cup
>>
>how is it that Fairy has 5 female specialists and yet not a single one of them is busty nor curvy?
Trannies, all of them.
>>
>>58620629
Now I'm wondering what the gender ratio for each type is.
>>
Lacey thread?
>>
>>58620676
>>58620678
Shauntal isn't busting either. If anything, you just further disproved your own point by posting this image.
>>
File: IMG_8917.jpg (8 KB, 150x150)
8 KB
8 KB JPG
>>58620699
This is from the Teraleak official concept art (no wonder she’s busty in the manga)

How about now?
>>
>>58620699
Also, you do realize the is goes from most busty (Melony) to most flat (Rika)

Organized by Blender anon months ago, implying Shauntal as one of the most busty ones in Pokémon Masters
>>
File: clair.png (1.5 MB, 1945x1058)
1.5 MB
1.5 MB PNG
>>58620653
>this is "modest at best"
>>
File: ratio.png (27 KB, 384x579)
27 KB
27 KB PNG
>>58620689
I made the chart! Higher ratio means more male, lower means more female. This is gym leaders and elite four only.


Ghost and flying are the most feminine pokemon types. Dark and rock are the most masculine.
>>
>>58620776
>zero female dark specialists
Karen?
>>
>>58620629
>fairy type = cute = juvenile = no breasts and curves
>>
>>58620629
Fairy is the pure type. Sluts and bimbos need not apply.
>>
>>58620776
Steel specialists are also mostly masculine
>>
>>58620629
Jacinthe?
>>
>>58621429
Maybe she has a few curves on her ass at most, but(t) that’s it
>>
>>58620930
Anon's criteria affects steel pretty heavily because over half of them aren't included, the ratio including all steel specialists would be 8:3.
>>
>>58620629
Tulip
>>
Fairies are for little girls therefore flat
>>
>>58621571
>>58620629
>fairy is the pedo type
So how come /vp/ hates fairy then? I thought we liked little girls here.
>>
>>58620629
Fairy is for cute, not sexy



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.