Would pokemon be better if the level cap was level 20?
>>58648005That's a very strange question
No
Yes because then autismos smogonites would have to remake their damage charts and everybody could level them to 20 easily
>>58648005Would we be locked out of any Pokemon that evolve past 20? Because that'd be hilarious
>>58648121Nah everything would just evolve sooner
I played a pokemon killer on gamecube where monsters didnt have levels but could evolve. Fun game but way too japanese to catch on
Would Pokemon be better if every Pokemon was Normal type
>>58648005No, the games would still be primitive, lazy and empty shovelware, but a vanishingly small minority of autists on the internet would be soothed by having smaller numbers instead of larger ones.
>>58648161You sound already angry enough to me
