Excited for Pokopia?
>>58651797I wish it was actually just DQ Builders 3 but yeah
Hell no
>>58652043This. We've only seen a little, but it already looks more barebones than even Dragon Quest Builders 1.
>>58652065They probably had to cut back on a lot of aspects to account for all of the interactions the pokemon have with you/the environmentJudging by what we've seen so far it seems like there's a good number of mons. Probably the entire Kanto dex+a good variety of mons that fit the game+shillmons
Its a keycard game. I'm not buying it.Wonder if I can pirate Switch 2 games in the meantime?
>>58651797I already played cobblemon
>>58651797It's a $70 key card game so no.
>>58651797Why is he goku
Getting Palfarm instead
>>58652357Why aren't you?
>>58652357I got this crazy fun fact about who did the art for Dragon Quest
>>58652072>Probably had to cut back due to mons and interactionsHow much money does Pokemon make, again?
>>58652657Pokemon games aren't going to get 6+ year long development cycles bro
>>58652665Why not?Especially a spinoff side game.
>>58652665>>58652686And what's to stop them from pushing their 1-2 year slop for a few cycles and working on something that will actually move the franchise for the next two decades in the background?
>>58652665But they SHOULD!
>>58652657You don't get rich by spending money, you get rich by finding the path that offers maximum profit for minimum investment.
>>58653130You'll never be one of those people, anon.Why are you defending the faceless 1%?
>>58653135It's not a defense, it's understanding reality.
>>58653135I dont get it at all, why do you cry on the sidelines for [game] [brand] instead of uninvesting in that obviously shit franchise, maximum irony this board.
