[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: G7xeVvmX0AANwOe.jpg (60 KB, 1100x906)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
What's veepee's verdict on her? Did GF redeem Mega Chomp?
>>
This design is so bad it actually made me appreciate the original Mega Garchomp more.
>>
it looks dumb
>>
This design is so good it actually made me realize just how awful the original Mega Garchomp is.
>>
Removing the Ground type gives me the ick. It better have a good ability to justify STAB being completely negged by fairies.
>>
>>58728420
design is better than OG Mega
stat spread is good
151 speed is insane
now it depends on the ability
>>
>58728420
>her
>>
File: Devil-Form-of-Pochita.jpg (189 KB, 640x456)
189 KB
189 KB JPG
>>58728420
Should've been dragon/steel and had a saw coming out of its forehead
>>
>>58728420
>removes ground type
>doesn’t make it flying or anything to compensate
it’s objectively worse now lmfao
>>
>>58728420
Cringe how its a female fin. Made Garchomp trans.
>>
>>58728420
What about Flygon ?
This is not fair
>>
>>58728420
I like it more than the og mega though i kinda just wish they made mega garchomp like zard y. But its whatever, the saw shark thing is cool, pure dragon is cringe though. Cant say for sure until abilities like all za megas
>>
>>58728420
How the hell does this design scream a mono dragon special attacker? It's literally got spiny bladed arms
>>
>>58728639
garchomp is always shown with the full fin
>>
>>58728420
>What if Garchomp...but aislop?
>>
>>58728424
Fpbp
>>
>>58729004
Flygon is too much of an unmarketable unlikable bland piece of shit to deserve a mega. Megas are for Pokémon that matter, not foddermons
>>
>>58728420
Ugly
Pointless
Unwanted
Those are the three words I use form basically almost all the new megas
>>
>>58730415
>Megas aren't for fodders
>Crabominable
>Pyroar
>Glalie
>Victreebel
>Scrafty
>>
>>58730429
Scrafty is kind of popular if you compare it with the garbage gen5 has in store
>>
>>58730415
Subjective.
>>
I think its a bad design. Literally monster hunter frontier tier where they just slap a bunch of spikes on the same model and call it a day. At least the original megachomp had a unique model.
>>
>>58728424
both mega garchomps are good, and they both make regular Garchomp look like a goofy retard.
>>
>>58730426
It has plenty of points, what are you talking about?
>>
File: 1746497468459268.png (486 KB, 686x386)
486 KB
486 KB PNG
>>58730415
AYYYYY, I'M WALKIN EHRE
>>
>>58730791
>slapping retarded looking stripes onto garchomp makes it look less retarded
>>
>>58728420
Its just a shit looking as the other Mega Garchomp
>>
File: 1756528499686803.png (609 KB, 1200x1200)
609 KB
609 KB PNG
>>58731729
It's mostly the arms. Regular Garchomp has tiny spike nubs for hands and shark fins on his forearms

The scythes on both mega forms just look better, more fearsome.

>but the stripes!
Is that really your biggest concern?
>>
>Its hyper-light body and blade-like wings ignite the air, propelling it past the sound barrier as if shredding the sky.
>is heavier than both base Garchomp and the og Mega Garchomp
kek this design is a fucking mess. Also it doesn’t look at all like a special attacker, they just forced it because “umm we better do the exact opposite of what we did with the last mega”



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.