[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why has every Pokemon DLC been worse than the previous one content-wise?

SwSh DLC was fantastic and it added tons of new content, including 2 new Battle Facilities (Restricted Sparring and Dynamax Adventures).

SV DLC was good, but inferior to SwSh DLC overall. Still added quite a bit of content, but no battle facility.

Legends Z-A DLC costs around the same but doesn't offer even half the content. There's no battle facility, no minigames, no side content. Just some stupid donut making LOL
>>
>>58729775
As someone who prefers characters and story, SV was better than SWSH for me. I also didn't get the SWSH DLC and just watched a playthrough of it because I had such low hopes for it due to how lackluster SWSH was even by Pokemon standards. ZA was good but the DLC looked lazy as fuck so I didn't get that either. Never mind that it's 1 DLC for the same price that the 2 from SWSH and SV cost
>>
As per the teraleak they said the DLC are becoming too expensive so they're cutting down costs.
>>
>>58729792
I respect your opinion and I understand that your personal preference is characters and story, but I think SwSh as a game is better than SV, and SwSh DLC is better than SV DLC.

As you may have guessed, I care more about battle facilities, minigames and replayable side content. The problem with story content is it can only be experience once and then it's over.
>>
>>58729806
This is just sad, considering that most modern Pokemon games are kinda content lacking already, and rely on the DLC to become more content packed.
>>
>>58729809
Nta but restricted sparring was boring as hell. Dynamax adventures was cool. But I play multiplayer for actual battling
>>
>>58729835
I personally enjoyed Restricted Sparring.
>>
>>58729775
>Why has every Pokemon DLC been worse than the previous one content-wise?
Because they know you'll still buy it anyway.
>>
>>58729854
>Because they know you'll still buy it anyway
Why was Isle of Armor and Crown Tundra so much better, then? Why weren't DLCs bad from the very beginning, if we would've bought them anyway?
>>
>>58729861
>Why was Isle of Armor and Crown Tundra so much better, then?
They weren’t. swoosh was just so shit even by pokemon’s abysmal standard that the DLC for was an improvement
>>
>>58729865
>swoosh was just so shit even by pokemon’s abysmal standard
Nice head cannon
>>
>>58729806
How the fuck can the DLC be too expensive? Where is the cost coming from? Cant Pedohmori cut back in his child porn habit so save cost?
>>
>>58729875
>Can't *rich person* cut back on *personal costs* to save the company or public money?
The answer is always no
>>
>>58729875
Small indie company please understand.
>>
SwSh had the best dlc out of all the Pokemon games on the Switch
>>
I prefer S/V but I agree ZA's DLC is pure shit
>>
>>58729875
>>58729907
Nintendo set the project budgets for Pokémon (and always have since giving Tajiri seed money and Miyamoto as sensei). how about you bitch at them to start spending EAD levels of money on Pokémon, but I doubt you'll A)n start blaming them or B) start bitchiing at them, as you KNOW they're just going to ignore your retarded arses the same way Game Freak do as you're irrelevant to both their vision for Pokémon.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.