The next (and final) streamer/e-celeb should be a villain or antagonist who exploits people, pokemon, and tragedies for views and spectacle.
>Make the antagonist switch outfits or costumes, the various versions being visual representations of the most toxic tubers of the west>Everyone mentioned or referred to by the antagonist is in a really negative light>Westerntuber either embrace it as a joke undermining it or get vehemently defensive about it, potentially crippling their reception.Making a villain eceleb means nothing without a punchline.
>>58745858would be kino
Pokemon having smartphones and clout chasing ecelebs feels so foreign somehow
>>58745858>Psychic or Dark>Dorky chick with Big tatas>Has a podcast/YouTube channel and talks about conspiracies
>>58745858Maybe they should come up with something new instead of recycling the same concept 3 games in a row
>>58746021Because Pokemon is based on Game Freak founders' childhood in the 1960s, yet it must modernize itself for the children of the 2020s, who live in a very different world compared to what Pokemon was initially based on...
>>58745858Is that a Burger King crown?
>>58745858>(and final)lmaothe influencer/tuber bubble could burst tomorrow and pokémon would continue to make those characters through gen 12
>>58745858>vilain>in a post gen 5 pokemon gameLmao never ever
>>58745858Sounds too good for Gayfreak
>>58746473Lysandre was pretty evil in XY
>>58746352Yep
>>58746021because they incorporated it in the most ham-fisted, retarded, out-of-touch way they possibly could have. They're pulling a "how do you do, fellow kids?" and the only reason people don't call it out is because the quality of writing in pokemon has always been equally awful.
>>58746493>all his action were to the good of humanity>in za you even ge to apologize to himnot evil, only a lil bit misguided
>>58745858So, a Unova male streamer?
>>58745858what does the antagonist of nope have to do with anything in the pic
>>58746690le spectacle
