holy based!
>>58758026How does an artist with a woke and anti-protag-sexualizing audience get away with making muscle fetish art? The same crowd that you call for your crucifixion if you draw Rosa with a pair of fat titties is clapping and cheering for this freak's art of a 6 ft tall roided out Selene getting steamy with Lillie. I thought aging up kid characters was a non-no?
>>58758026New pixels of anabel for my collection
>>58758026Emma if she was Paldean
>>58758026Just say you like men
>>58758112It's OK if they're trans. Trans representation can't be wrong - t: tranny
>>58758276Beat me to it
>>58758112Because thats a trans build
Tryhard thread + comments
>>58758112Because it's "empowering" so it's ok.Making fetish porn where the woman is a victim in any way or is made helpless? Not ok.Making fetish porn where the woman gets stronger or gets turned into a marginalised group (black, trans, disabled etc)? Ok.It's the same with when guys are horny for women.Being like "I want to put my penis into this woman"? Not ok.Being like "oooh mommy step on me"? Ok.It's simple, really. Stupid as fuck, but simple.