Am I ever going to get an apology for all the gaslighting over this "theory"? It was abusive orwellian speak.
no. you're going to get them claiming victory anyway every gen instead
>>58781766press S to spit
>>58781766>You now remember people were screaming at you that cyndaquil was a rat and you were retarded for not seeing it.
>>58781766You should kys for being so retarded to believe this autistic schizo garbage anywaySeriously how fucking dumb do you have to be to believe any of this
>>58781766It took until Fuecoco to get me to stop believing it
>>58781766I'm sorry for trying to gazlight you. You're right, I knew it was false from the start. But I found it amusing to keep spreading this theory, to perpetuate it, to find the most far-fetched arguments in its favor. Until I started to believe it myself a little, to defend it almost at face value, to be annoyed by the “stupidity” of people who didn't see the good points I was making, drowned out by the mass of fallacious arguments. What I did, what I did to you, is inexcusable. I hope you will forgive me.
>>58781766It was bound to end anyway. We already have a fire horse and having 2 ungulates so close together would be weird. It was fun while it lasted.
>>58781766I mean, if we end up getting either a snake, a cow/bull or a horse in gen 10, it would be so, so funny
>>58781766Fuecoco works okay as a dragon, maybe the theory could be reframed as requiring each fire starter to be something from the zodiac rather than strictly requiring it to have exactly one entry from each. In that case, we could get additional roosters and rabbits before the whole zodiac is filled out, but the theory still stands in a form.
