[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 20260111_105519.png (221 KB, 728x483)
221 KB
221 KB PNG
The existence of scientific names in Pokemon raises questions, such as whether only the Pokemon has it or if it applies to the entire evolutionary line, or if it's scientific name changes when it evolves? What about regional variants?
>>
>>58826190
Kabutops was also given a scientific name in the anime: Kabutops maximus
>>
>>58826190
AFAIK, FR/LG entries were retconned since it mentions indian elephants.
>>
>>58826246
They're still referenced later i.e. the switchup to be Copperajah instead, plus this dex entry was in XY. I'm sure scientific names don't contradict anything worth retconning.
>>
File: 2025121214411000_s.jpg (241 KB, 1280x720)
241 KB
241 KB JPG
>>58826190
>What about regional variants?
They're more akin to breeds, so they share the same scientific name. Be Norwegian, Siamese, Abyssinian, Scottish Fold, Maine Coon, they're all felis catus
>>
If Pokémon have scientific names, then I wonder how they relate to these:
https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Pok%C3%A9mon_category

>>58826285
Some other kinds of Forms for some Pokémon could be thought of as that too.
>>
>>58826190
>scientific names
It's completely irrelevant in pokemon. Basically they give different names to the same species instead of accoutning for ontogeny
>>
How can Pikachu be the Mouse Pokemon if they don't know what a mouse is?
>>
>>58827849
The same way humans figured out to start calling a bull a bull instead of continuing to use the primal recognition of "four-legged two-horned meat-haver".
>>
>>58827907
I can't tell if you're a normal illiterate or an esl.
>>
>>58828098
The point I'm making is that humans in the Pokemon world determined that there should be uniform classifications to denote commonalities between different species, and that while those species are wholly distinct, they have common ancestral roots that warrant viewing the correlation. Thus, they figured out Pikachu should be known as a "mouse" because they recognized there are other Pokemon with similar qualities, and they gave that shared commonality a name, deeming them "mouse" Pokemon.
It's just that, looking at it solely from an in-universe lens, it's pure coincidence that those terms are also ones we recognize from real life, and one could argue they derived the name "mouse" from Tandemaus and Maushold, given Pokemon's worldbuilding loves to connect the origin of human constructs to being inspired by Pokemon in some shape or form (i.e. people made ice cream cones look the way they do because they were inspired by Vanillite's appearance).
>>
>>58826190
This name is a joke and not real Latin based taxonomy.
/thread
>>
>>58828117
Pikachu is actually easy.
Full binomial: Scintillamus fulguricaudatus
Basicly this fits the whole Pikaclone line as the Genus and Fulguricaudatus as the Pikachu speices itself with Parvus as Pichu, and Tonans as Raichu and the Subspecies Tonanicogitati Alolan Raichu.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.