>FRLG remakes/rerelease revealed/release on pokemon day (2/27)True or bullshit?If true, are you getting them?Remaking a remake is kinda crazy specifically, but I guess remaking RBY is equally tired at this point. At least its a gen 3 game.I’ve been itching to play a pokemon, so I guess I’ll at least wait and see.
>>58930647Why would I buy a game I can easily emulate? Also, I have serious Kanto fatigue and don't want to play through that region again anytime soon.
>>58930647If this was any other game maybe but I’ve seen enough FRLG from ROM hacks. I can also just play the originals right now if I wanted to. Home support means nothing to me.
>>58930647I think it's more likely just a new Kanto game, though being able to return to the Sevii Islands in an official capacity would be nice.
>>58930647I’m only getting them if they dexcut anything not from kanto
Why would I buy games I already own, especially if there's absolutely no difference?
Gimme some Champions news, for fuck's sake.
>>58930647Given it wasn't even mentioned in the Teraleak I have my doubts, but as far as just putting it on Nintendo Online they wouldn't need to put any internal effort into it so that's the only thing I would expect. I expect Gen 10 news and nothing else. Next year I expect Gen 10 DLC and Legends Galar unless it got canceled with maybe a hint at whatever Project Seed is unless it also got super canceled (and even if it didn't I wouldn't expect it).
>>58930857just Pokopia then?
>>58930893Given how Pokopia of all things was mentioned in the Teraleak, unfortunately it seems like that's about it aside from a potential Nintendo Online drop of some Pokemon games. The GameCube titles were announced and not followed up on which is a bit odd, so maybe we'll see them then.
>Kantoslop who cares
>>58930647it came from khu, this is complete bullshit
>>58930647Reminder that despite being remade over and over, the onlt way to play Kanto with the spec/phys split is LGPE. A remake would legitimately bring something new to the game.
>>58930857>Pokémon Legends: Rocket
>>58930929We had Pokemon Legends: Galaxy and Pokemon Legends: (somewhat) Flare already, so this doesnt seem impossible.With that said, would we have two versions of Legends: Aqua/Magma?
>>58930647Why should I blindly believe Khuck? Remember when we got the PKHeX feature in SV? Remember when a brand new game set in Unova was announced in 2024?
>>58930647Will not happen.Due to changes in law and their own internal design philosophy, GF would need to rework both game corner and safari zone + FRLG may or may not be the most pirated game in history of gaming.GF may be retarded, but they are also lazy and greedy. Expecting them to do extra work for nothing is silly.They may experiment with Kantoooo and goung back to 2d, but it will be a new game.
>>58930966No one cares about europe, just label it 18+ there. Its a label for parents and parents today have played and heard of pokemon fire/blue/green before, they know its a bullshit label and will buy it for their children anyways.
>>58930982>no-one caresExcept the people who very much care if one region's game performance is arbitrarily hampered by being restricted to adults, when their entire series is focused on children, you retard fuck. They cut the game corner, rather than make two versions of the game, one for japan and america and one for europe. You're WHOLLY retarded if you think they're going to release it in some places and not others. It's going to be a nice, rule-friendly remake, to ensure a uniform presentation to the entire world.
>>58930935Neither of those games exist.
>>58930647They're 100% going to be re-releases separate from NSO, with e-reader content and mystery gift events, compatible with Home. Personally I'll only consider buying it if battling and trading online is possible.
>>58930966>>58931011Balatro got around it, I think the biggest media franchise in the world could throw their weight around a little
It is going to be a 1:1 remake of FRLG by ILCA, probably on the same engine as BDSP. Its lazy but releasing paid ROMs of FRLG is lazier.
>>58930647I'm skeptical of any major projects that weren't mentioned in the teraleak development roadmap. I mean I know GF has short dev cycles, but there would likely be at least a conceptual outline. so, I could see a re-release, but not a full blown remake. seems pretty soon to make another remake after they just did LGPE not that long ago too.
>>58931137Balatro "got around it" by not being gambling, but using the rules of blackjack as a rolling method. To even play the games, you need to bet coins on machines that are pretty realistic versions of real world slot machines. There's no "throwing weight around" when they didn't try to avoid a 12's for Gen 1 when the rating was mandated 12's.
>>58930647pokemongo needs more return to kanto bullshit which starts on march 3 so some kanto rubbish rehash is more likely than you think
>>58930908>The GameCube titles were announced and not followed up on which is a bit oddThat's just how NSO works. They announced a bunch of GameCube games on the reveal trailer without any dates, and then shadowdropped them suddenly even couple of months. Fire Emblem was only released last month and Mario Sunshine is still missing in action.>>58931152I wouldn't call it impossible since BDSP wasn't initially planned and then had a very quick two year dev cycle. But TPC also didn't like how BDSP turned out so they won't want a repeat. That said if it is just literally FRLG stuck on a cart like they did for the English ROM of the first Fire Emblem, then that could get away with a super quick development.
