[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: image (7).png (477 KB, 446x415)
477 KB
477 KB PNG
The great debate
>>
>>58935931
Scarlet and Violet
>>
>liquid shit vs puke
>"debate"
>>
>>58935931
Top: Sharty region
Bottom: Sharty magnet
>>
>>58935931
I'll take SwSh over SV
>>
File: Capture.jpg (19 KB, 415x386)
19 KB
19 KB JPG
>>58935931
how it feels to say
>Scarlet and Violet are better games, Sword and Shield are better POKEMON games
>>
>>58935931
both were launched blatantly unfinished, are objectively ugly, are full of mechnical jank, full of absurd power creep mons, and mixed bags on new mon designs

SV is more ambitious, has a better story and characters, tera is easily the least dogshit mechanic so far for multiplayer, and has better DLC

all SwSh offers is traditional routes but even then they are probably the most barebones and forgettable in the entire franchise

SV > SwSh but both are objectively bad. only real high point for the last few generations has been basic QoL improvements for getting into multiplayer.
>>
>>58935947
probably true
>>
>>58935931
SV easily. They're amongst the best games in the series with an abundance of content. They're easily the most replayable too considering you can go in any order you want and the dex is massive.
>>
File: 1674298232663.jpg (117 KB, 850x1073)
117 KB
117 KB JPG
>>58935931
SV 100%
>>
>>58935931
The only thing SWSH has going for it is that it looks way less ugly SV claps in every other category
>>
>>58935931
latinxes shouldnt even be compared to GODlar
>>
>>58936061
Youtuber opinion
>>
>>58935931
Artstyle, character designs, and stability: SwSh
Literally everything else: SV
>>
I played Sword and Arceus Legends and never touched Scarlet/Violet and that ZA game and I'm glad I didn't. I might bite next games though.
>>
>>58935931
Gen 9, no question. SwSh was garbage. SV wasn’t much better, but I don’t look at Paldea with disdain like I do Galar.
>>
>>58935931
all shit
>>
Is there a reason for the complete drop-off in quality when it came to the Switch era in Pokemon?
Genuinely, what happened? Is it the Switch's fault?
>>
>>58936392
Game Freak could mask their technical incompetence by system limitations. When they were forced to move to consoles, it became clear they couldn't handle being on par with current gen technology. Trying to do so just results in overtaxing the system for trying to run Gamecube level games
>>
>>58935931
Pokemon Trash vs Pokemon Garbage
>>
>>58935931
Remove Area Zero and no one gives a fuck about SV.
>>
>>58935931
>story
SV
>gameplay
SS
>>
>>58935931
I refuse to pit two bad bitches against each other
>>
>>58935931
Both are shit
>>
>>58935931
SV was the worse game I've played on the Switch, I at least liked SwSh's dlc
>>
>>58936639
its honestly hard to give a fuck about even with it
>>
File: bigboy.jpg (377 KB, 1117x634)
377 KB
377 KB JPG
>>58935931
>>
>>58935931
SV has a better campaign
SS has a better everything else
>>
>>58937254
Anything below the score of 90 is garbage or mediocre
>>
As much as I enjoy both,
dawg this is comparing like dominoes to little ceaseser's to see what's the less mediocre/dissapointing pizza at best.
>>
>>58935931
Switch 2 version of SV
>>
if SV had proper open world game design (level scaling bosses) it would be the clear winner but since it doesn't it is only a narrow winner
>>
>>58935931
Sword for Bea feet on my face
Violet for futuremons. The pastmons should have went with an "ancient lost technology" angle and not just made them look like extinct animals.
>>
>>58937443
if there was a wrong opinion to have on the paradoxmons this would be the most wrong one
>>
>>58937507
Fuck no, pastmons look like overdesigned tryhard dogshit.
>>
>>58935931
It really isn't a debate, SV shits all over SwSh and whoever says otherwise is trying too hard to be a contrarian.
>>
SV is the worst Pokemon game ever made so far. 2nd worst is a toss up between ZA SwSh.

SwSh has more potential as a fan game using an asset rip and flip in unity/Godot/unreal, that's really about it.
>>
>>58935931
SwSh
>>
>>58935931
SV is superior
>>
>>58935931
Swsh. Somehow sv ruined breeding and ruined raids
>>
>>58935931
I've played more Pokémon sword since buying my switch 2 than scarlet even though I have the pay to win shiny encounters on scarlet
>>
>>58935931
both are shit, but I much rater play through SwSh again than playing through SV, that Open World is by far the worse Open World game I've ever played, it's so fucking boring to explore.
>>
>>58937782
rather*
>>
SV is better in every way
>>
All the posts saying SS are so forced they can't even put the correct abbreviation
>>
>>58935931
???
There is literally no debate
SV >>>> SwSh
Everyone who disagrees didn't play them and/or is a troll
>>
>>58935931
The female npcs of Scarlet and Violet are clearly modeled off Eddie Hall
>>
>>58937896
i played both and SwSh is genuinely just a more fun pokemon game, the only thing SV did better was the story and the characters, which i'll admit is atrocious in SwSh
>>
>>58937813
I liked SWSH more than SV :)
>>
>>58935931
Even if you don't like SV at least it does new/different things, SwSh at BEST is the worst version of the traditional formula and there's no real reason to play it over any of the others



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.