[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


If they ever made a classic styled game, would you want them to keep any QoL and later additions like the Physical/Special split?
>>
>>58942557
Phys/Spec split, Fairy typing, steel no longer resists dark and ghost, cross Gen evos retroactively added, Ryback.
>>
>>58942557
why would I want to keep a later addition that made the games objectively worse
>>
File: repelb2w2.jpg (407 KB, 3897x2926)
407 KB
407 KB JPG
This is a must.
>>
>>58942557
If by classic style you mean Gen II mechanics then I would really only care about having Hyper Training to boost IVs up to competitive viability
>>
>>58942564
Also, EXP share. Don't care, nobody likes grinding.
>>
>>58942557
No
>>
>>58942557
Yes. Why would you not? If they could combine the HGSS bag layout and stuff with some Gen 6 features like the PSS, you'd have a pretty good foundation.
>>
>>58942557
Yes but keep the Japan setting.
>>
>>58942557
Just because it's classic-styled doesn't mean it would have to make all the gameplay exactly like it too.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.