>Haven't played Pokemon since the SV DLCs back in 2023>Just opened /vp/ after nearly half a decade after hearing about FRLG's overpriced ROMsI feel so disillusioned by the current state of affairs. This used to be my favorite franchise
Okay
>overpriced>$19.99Fuck if THAT'S overpriced I'd shutter to see what you considered outrageous pricing.
>priced like your average Inti Creates garbage >overpriced Sasuga, favelatard.
>>58944651it's overpriced because it's free on every phone or computer alreadyevery person who could possibly want to play red/green/yellow could play it for free with a modicum of effort
>>58944651It probably cost them less than $19.99 to do the port. Some guy probably did it over his lunch break.
>>58944641I don't believe your post is genuine.If you were truly done with this franchise why are you still coming back here?
>>58944834Then play it on there if you want to?
>>58944834That’s almost every game you fucking noodlebrain
>>58944834so you're just a piratefag trying to stir up trouble. into the trash you go.
>>58944849Because I have AIDS
>>58944854no, but every game pre 1999 maybehttps://gbapokemon.com/play/pokemon-fire-red/you can play it in a browser ffsthis is the simplest thing that anyone who could want it should have itlike getting mad c.s. lewis isn't getting paid when I post a chronicles of narnia.txt on usenet
>>58944651You are paying 20 bucks for ROMs you can download anywhere for free. There's not even online features to justify the price.
>>58944973It's simple convenience and it will get Home support later so you can move mons you catch to modern games.Stop caring how others spend $20, it doesn't affect you.
>>58944921Piratefag, you can literally pirate any game. That does not mean that it should now be free. that’s such a brick brained way of thinking.You retards would do great battling against stuff the housing crisis…actual price gouging and ripoffs, shit that would actually fucking help people but instead you’re posting online about how some shit you don’t need to live decently should be free. Like you get off on being absolutely useless Fuck off retard.
>>58944641See you next week
>>58944641Nintendo has gotten really bad in general. This should have been $10 at most for one version, which would be in line with the prices they charged for the gen 1 and 2 e-shop prices before. Number must go up, though. Rich shareholders need more money to spend on their child prostitutes.
>>58944849If he's disillusioned by the current state of affairs, why did he play SV and its DLC?
>>58945142>if you think $20 is too much to ask for a 20 year old game that means you think it should be given away for freeI don't know how you even manage to remember to breathe when you're this stupid.
>>58944840This is Pokemon games every time>Cheaply-made>OverpricedNo wonder they make tens of billions every new release
>>58944834>everything's overpriced because you can just steal itgreat
>>58944853Shut the fuck up bootlicker
>>58944641It's time to move on
>>58945558If every motherfucker who needed to do that could do that /vp/ would be a far less angry, far less autistic shithole wasteland.
>>58944651Usually if they're reselling an ass old game especially from handhelds they put it in a collection with some extra options. They couldn't even give you fr+lg and some language options, each one is separate. Never seen anything lazierAnd that'll be 20 buckeroonies please. I can get an entire new game for that much
>>58945297>WAHHWAHH GAME I DONT HAVE TO BUY COST LE HECKIN MONEY??? WAAAHExcept I know how you think, retard bc you’re the most boring piece of turd in any Pokemon discussion board. Looking for reasons to be mad bc your life is ass and you can’t figure out why.No one is selling a best selling GBA port for 10 dollars you absolute faggot. And then you come here hoping to find other idiots thinking you won’t be labeled a retard.I’m here to tell your dumbass that this is not a pathetic retard safe haven. If you can just emulate it then shut the fuck up and emulate it.
>>58945858Does Nintendo pay you to suck their cocks or do you just do it for free?
>>58945858what price would be unreasonable to you? $50? if they charged $75 would you be here yelling about how great it is?why are you so glad to purchase a rerelease that has zero effort or additional features
>>58945929I charge your mother 70 an hour to fuck her and talk about how much of a failure her kid is. Let’s me buy games without being weird about it.>>58946127There is no price unreasonable for a video game you don’t have to buy. I already have FRLG you retard, I don’t care if people buy it for 20 dollars. That would be strange as fuck thing to worry about unless I’m a lifeless loser who can only love through a children’s series
>>58944834Then go emulate it you faggot. Normies won't emulate it and don't emulate shit. frlg On switch is FOR NORMIES AND CHILDREN. Normies do not emulate, normies will never EVER bother to emulate.
>>58944849Who’s the hottie
>>58946275Midna
>>58946279>That’s a Zelda character Oh shit. Thanks
No! I'm so disillusioned! This video game costs $5 more than I deem personally acceptable!
>>58944973>You are paying 20 bucks for ROMs you can download anywhere for free.Literally every game that has ever existed can be downloaded for free.
>>58944641>SV DLC in 2023>*barely* more than 2 years since release>"nearly half a decade"
>>58945929Do pirates pay you to suck their cocks or do you just torrent their balls for free?
>>58946589lol why would someone have to pay me to like getting shit for free?
>>58944651Would you consider a single Reese’s overpriced if it cost $20? Probably yes, because it’s available at every store and it’s nothing new or special.So you can understand when Nintendo resells a 25 year old game that can be downloaded for free very easily, twenty bucks would seem overpriced.
>>58946239>That would be strange as fuck thing to worry aboutyou seem pretty worried buddyAnyway, selling frlg for 20 bucks without something like a minor graphical update, online features or just anything more than a direct port of the advance releases
>>58944651>For a decades old game>no improvements made what so ever >no physical cartridge meaning you down own it, just renting it until the cloud service dies >also this same game was $10 on the previous platform Stop coping, Epstien. It is objectively overpriced
>>58947310>just renting it until the cloud service diesyou can play it offline perfectly fine retard>>also this same game was $10 on the previous platformjust outright lying now
>>58946807Fallacious argument, you can't download a reeses (figures a burger would make a food analogy in a desperate attempt to reinforce her upset). I notice you cunts ignore FFVII (a 29 year old game at this stage) has been broken up into THREE separate releases and priced at $40 each, leaving a grand total of $120 for a game I can download, burn and play on my chipped PS1. It's almost as if popular, high-selling titles can in fact price re-releases at a higher price point, as there was a reason they even sold so well first time out but go wave megaman GBA collection around again. the fac they threw everyting in together proes how little interest the masses have for it.
