I cant believe people are really going to pay $20 to play a 22 year old game that has been playable as a free rom for 20 years. They didnt even make improvements like upscaling it to fit a switch screen or replacing the tiny sprites with high quality art or animation. Just $20 for a 16 megabyte game from 22 years ago.
People paid $35 for it 22 years ago. What's the problem exactly?
old games goodnew games bad
>>58946299>I cant believe people are really going to pay $20 to play a 22 year old gameI can
>>58946299This fanbase is beyond saving at this point anon
Why should I not spend money on a game that I will enjoy? And no, piracy isn't an excuse.
>>58946299I cant believe people are really going to pay $60 to play a 22 year old game that has been playable as a free rom for 20 years. They didnt even make improvements like upscaling it to fit a switch screen or replacing the tiny sprites with high quality art or animation. Just $60 for a 16 megabyte game from 22 years ago.
>>58946523Highly doubt OP would ever defend BDSP so I'm not sure what this parroting is achieving here.
>>58946534It means this isn't the first time we've encountered the "why pay money for old games" debateslop. Why should this instance be more important than the previous iterations?
>>58946299I was scrolling through my download folder and I went past a Pokemon rom and started chuckling, thinking about how people would pay $20 for this file
>>58946587>why should current thing be more relevant and talked about than old thingOne of those mysteries I guess
