pokemon was always way uglier and way easier than everything else on its system, you just have nostalgia goggles
>>58947156True. Retarded normies just have way lower standards for sprites, so they think anything that has sprites automatically has good graphics.
>>58947156>>58947162Literally nobody has ever thought mainline pokemon had good graphics.
>>58947168There are hundreds of retards who genuinely think Gen 5 looks good, anon.
>>589471761,000,000 people online mean nothing to me compared to the 2 or 3 people I've talked about it in real life with.
This was always gen3+ shitter cope.Gen 1 was on par with the rpgs you had on gb and GS were some of the best looking games on it and by far the prettiest and biggest rpgs you could play on it.People seriously understimate gen2 in its own console because the rest look a whole generation behind,
>>58947156THE SAME 5 THREADS
Pokemon was never the best looking game on its target hardware, but they made up for it with a larger overworld compared to other games on the same platform and they were never outright ugly.Nowadays, they look downright amateur.
>>58947156I'm getting real tired of your strawmans. Who has ever said otherwise?
>>58947156okay, why does this mean we can't complain about the roblox tier graphics in the switch era?
>>58947209On multiple boards.
>>58947156both look a billion times better than Scat and Vomit.
>>58947287frlg is the first demake
Gen 3 had a big problem with its colors and spriting style but everything was fixed in gen 4. Detail doesn't really matter as much as how effective it is in a game context anyway. The right doesn't get points for looking busy and detailed alone
>>58947162The PMDE pic is what some retards think Gen TWO looked like
>>58947204>Gen 1 was on par with the rpgs you had on gb>posts pic of game that looks better than gb pokemonwhat did he mean by this
