This makes Pokéshills shake and seethe.
Since at least 2023
>>58951617One detail that pisses me off, they based these in the original games when they should have used the GBA remakes (except FF III as it doesn't have a GBA remake).
>>58951617Context?
>>58951617>70 bucks for games so old my grandpa used to play as a kid>censored for modern sensibilitiesYeah, no.
>>58951625does that collection exist? ive seen it posted a few times but idk if it was a limited time drop or bait
>>58951643It's fake.
>>58951643Bait>>58951641Didn't they remove the game corner in europe in the FRLG porting? Lol
>>58951646>>58951650thanks, missing that mario collection still haunts me
>>58951640>6 games>Remade graphics>New QoLs>Physical release>60-70$Pokémon is 1 game from 2004 at $20, both are greedy, but pokemon is waaaay worse
>Still posting that shitty fake>when we all know squenix would actually split each game into three part remakes charged at a collective $120
>>58951617yeah but its like 80 fucking dollars or something for 6 extremely old games and they botched the graphics to the degree it looks like a bootleg mobile game and its missing content from the original remakes, id say this isnt a good comparison at all, id sooner go for like the mega man collections, that star force one looks like theres alot of love put into it
>>58951617I was thinking you were exaggerating, then saw the recent respond defending FRLG and holy shit you are right>>58951643No, the exact same fake ass cover was posted since 2022
>>58951659FF VI alone is honestly worth the 60, rest is just a bonusFRLG being the worst remakes aren't even worth 10
No one knows what that is outside Japan besides gaming circles
