>be gamefreak>release ports of a 22 year old game that can be played on an emulator>make them pay $19.99What went wrong?
>>58962555>What went wrong?Nothing
>>58962555Either buy the game for 20 bucks, or don't buy it. Stop coping already.
>>58962555Pokegoys are so retarded they'll buy it anyway, and shillkikes will throw a tantrum for not funding Game Freak's child rape dungeon in israeli
>>58962555The only thing that went wrong was the lack of online trading. The $20 is a nonissue, get a job
>>58962569"don't attack the billion dollar company"
>>58962569>>58962609
>>58962626>makes a retarded thread>"stop being retarded">S-STOP BOOTLICKING!Get a job
Povvo fuckers, manchild incels and spergs worldwide thinking they were owed the game for free.
This thread is cancerous>retarded fags thinking tpci will sell ports for free>retarded fags defending the billion dollar companyBoth sides are just as retarded
>>58962644Where's the>retarded monkey thinknig the corporation runs core pokémon like it does her favelaBecause the pricing is down to Nintendo and Game Freak, yet none of your detestable fuckers even comprehend it's them to blame and not "the billion dollar corporation" boogyman. And the fact you're similarly stunned by Nintendo's jewish pricing, despite knowing they don't cheap out on selling ANY their old shit's laughable
>>58962644>le enlightened centrist (who's also a non-buyer so he's just opening himself up to being called a brown poorfag by the drones)You're just as bad.
>>58962702And let me guess, you support gamefreak?
>>58962714>everyone I don't like supports gamefreak
>>58962714No, I only come here to shitpost for free (You)s because this board is full of suckers, more than any other on 4chan.
>>58962555$20 is absurd but it could've been worse. They could've made it a subscription service like some retards want. At least this sets a good precedent.
>RERELEASE YOUR GAMES SO WE CAN BUY THEM>okay>NO NOT LIKE THAT IM JUST GOING TO PIRATE IT NOW
>>58962928People who want old games to be rereleased when emulators are avaliable are just as stupid
>>58963009Not everyone wants to be a pirate, unfortunately
i dont think nobody would complain it being $20 if they didnt cut access to half the game with no online like trade evolutions
>>58962928Well consider that all the other gameboy games are already being released on the NSO service and they just left fire red and leaf green out intentionally
>>58963076>i dont think nobody would complain it being $20 if they [makes up shit]
>>58963083seek employment
>>58963076Source for the last shit OP? Or did you find that info while digging in your ass?
>>58962555Been out of the loop for a decade, can you eventually move Pokemon from these ports to a box/newer game or is it just for le reddit nostalgia?
>>58963117FRLG are going to be Home-supported later, yes. It's now become increasingly likely the reason why they're taking so long to update Home compatibility is because they want to support LZA, Champions (assuming it comes out shortly after the Pokemon Presents) AND the FRLG ports all at once, maybe even Pokopia too if speculation over the use of mainline Pokemon icons leads to letting us send over its unique mons, seeing as how LZA set precedent for allowing us to obtain and relocate unique character mons (Eternal Floette)..
>>58963117No clue how it works
>>58963073Pirating is stupid, if you like the games then pay fair value for them or don't at all. I don't get people who like something but refuse to support the creators.
>>58963165Have a good look at the prices for older Pokemon games and come back here.
>>5896317220 is nothing, it was $60 on release inflation adjusted
>>58963172Yeah I saw it. It's cheap
>>58963183$240 for Pokemon Black is cheap?
>>58963192why do you need an unopened pristine copy? they're only like $90 on ebay for the cart
>>58963192wow I didn't know nintendo was still selling Pokemon Black and White
