[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Browt.png (647 KB, 1450x1450)
647 KB
647 KB PNG
This is quite possibly the worst designed starter Pokémon of all time.
>>
File: file.png (118 KB, 294x273)
118 KB
118 KB PNG
>>58978668
My initial reaction seeing this guy was that he feels like he was designed simple enough so he can be shared as LINE (or whatever the Chinese use) stickers.
>>
File: IMG_6389.png (28 KB, 641x697)
28 KB
28 KB PNG
>>58978668
billions must die
>>
>>58978668
Sobble, quaxley, popplio and sprigatito are worse. This thing is simple, not overdesigned, and has actual personality beyond just being hecking cute. I think he has potential. His evos will make or break him.
>>
File: Sobble.png (93 KB, 257x388)
93 KB
93 KB PNG
>>58978668
That would be Sobble. Sobble looks like shit. Chud bird is a passable albeit very plain design.
>>
>>58978764
>>58978780
I would honestly put Browt on the same level as Sobble, genuinely. Just makes me wonder who the fire starter to such a bad trio should be though...are there any bad first stage fire starters?
>>
File: 20260227_170704.png (102 KB, 256x288)
102 KB
102 KB PNG
>>58978761
>>
>>58978788
>I would honestly put Browt on the same level as Sobble, genuinely.
I wouldn't. I consider Sobble to be a complete abomination. Browt at least has some redeemableness in its design.
>>
>>58978668
Nigger did you see the fucking water starter.
>>
File: 912.png (87 KB, 475x475)
87 KB
87 KB PNG
>>58978668
Nowhere near as bad as the bootleg donald duck
>>
File: gen 10 starter.jpg (388 KB, 844x738)
388 KB
388 KB JPG
>>
>>58978668
SWSH and SV exist
>>
>>58978761
>>58978791
based chudbird
>>
>>58978668
nah, tepig is objectively worse
>>
GOOD STARTER DESIGNS
>Bulbasaur (1996)
>Charmander (1996)
>Squirtle (1996)
>Pikachu (1996)
>Cyndaquil (1999)
>Totodile (1999)
>Fennekin (2013)
average year: 1999

OK STARTER DESIGNS
>Chikorita (1999)
>Mudkip (2002)
>Turtwig (2006)
>Chimchar (2006)
>Piplup (2006)
>Litten (2016)
>Gecqua (2027)
average year: 2009

GARBAGE STARTER DESIGNS
>Treecko (2002)
>Torchic (2002)
>all gen 5 (2010, 2010, 2010)
>Chespin (2013)
>Froakie (2013)
>Rowlet (2016)
>Popplio (2016)
>all gen 8 (2019, 2019, 2019)
>all gen 9 (2022, 2022, 2022)
>Browt (2027)
>Pombon (2027)
average year: 2016
>>
>>58978668
nah, tepig is fennekin worse
>>
>>58978668
I like the chud bird.
>>
>>58978791
the region has fallen, billions must fly
>>
I like how ugly it is
I'm picking him
>>
>>58979489
>Treecko
>Torchic
>>
>>58978668
No joke, he grew on me thanks to the fanart
>>
>>58978668
It looks so dumb and silly I actually kind of like it. Lizard is still the best though.
>>
>>58979859
>Just saw a trainer with a Galar starter.
>>
>trying to recapture Rowlet's success
>>
>>58979489
>Torchic

You guys just say anything
>>
>>58978668
It's a great design that would feel right at home in gen 3.
You only dislike it because le new is le bad.
>>
>>58978668
squirtle exists so no
>>
>>58978668
They all are, but I would be okay with the Pomeranian if it didn't seem like it was TPC trying to take Cassette Beasts down
>>
3 of the last 4 gens had a Bird starter. Aren't there different kinds of animals?
>>
>>58979888
>>58980102
they look like total shit
>>
>>58979489
Fennekin is dogshit
>>
>>58980414
nope it looks good
>>
>>58980415
No. It looks like deformed bobble-headed garbage.
>>
>>58980649
you might be thinking of torchic
>>
>>58979888
trips of truth, got him
>>
>>58978668
wrong, the galar and paldea starters exist
>>
>>58978746
What a terrible fucking design. This type of shit is usually reserved for literalwhomon nobody even bothers catching. Actual 0/10
>>
>>58980415
...if they stopped at braixen
>>
>>58981085
nope cant remember the name of the final evo but it looks great
>>
>>58978668
No that’s Sobble
>>
File: 1462725724.png (104 KB, 265x190)
104 KB
104 KB PNG
>>58978791
>>
>>58978668
Everytime I see this fucker I wanna kick him like a soccer ball
still going to choose him
>>
File: 1700871443255630.png (145 KB, 625x415)
145 KB
145 KB PNG
>>58981123
>>
its growing on me
>>
>>58980107

Not even. I try to be optimistic unlike all the contrarianfags on vp. When everyone was shitting on the gen 6 trio, I was defending them. I even like most of the gen 8 and 9 designs.

But this? This fucker is minimalist slop with a bad color palette and ripoff design.

He is instantly, 100% the worst first stage starter I have ever seen. The other two have flaws imo but no more than any other gen. (Alright, Gecqua is kinda just Sobble again, but it at least looks interesting).

Even Chespin beats him by a country mile. I saw the leaked post last night and legitimately was 100% convinced he was fake, designed by a free online AI.

Also, Kanto starters suck. And Kanto was my first game. It's not just new = bad. It's just bad.
>>
>>58981673
chespin hate is such a forced meme
>>
>>58978668
I still dislike the Grass monkey from Sword/Shield the most. That's just my personal opinion though, I don't know if it's actually the "worst designed starter of all time."
>>
>>58978668
this is like rowlet but shit
>>
>>58981508
Well duh. It’s a Grass type.
>>
>>58980160
like 2/3 of all vertebrates are birds, if anything there sgould be more birds than there already are
>>
>>58978668
That's my fucking chud icon, respect him.
>>
File: 640px-0255Torchic.png (134 KB, 640x640)
134 KB
134 KB PNG
>>58980107
Feels like he is missing a little something that I can't put my finger on it
Torchic is pretty simple but I still like him
>>
>>58978668
Inteleon
>>
>>58978668
Looks like a Sanrio character
>>
File: HCMZF7dbEAMgVMB.webm (398 KB, 712x1280)
398 KB
398 KB WEBM
>>58978668
>>
>>58979489
>Why yes I am a balding millennial, how could you tell?
>>
>>58982910
nope i have a full healthy head of hair



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.